Print 41 comment(s) - last by toyotabedzrock.. on Feb 11 at 7:09 PM

There is growing concern among government officials that the United States isn't doing enough protect the country's computer networks

President Barack Obama has issued a 60-day review of federal cyber security just days after numerous high-profile hacker intrusions, including an attack on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

During the review, the government expects to look at the "plans, programs and activities" of U.S. cyber security efforts against both domestic and foreign attacks.

"The national security and economic health of the United States depend on the security, stability, and integrity of our nation's cyberspace, both in the public and private sectors," President Obama's assistant for counterterrorism and homeland security John Brennan said in a statement.

Several security experts accused former President Bush's cybersecurity team of neglecting possible cyber attacks, while also stating the U.S. Department of Homeland Security was ill-equipped to deal with cybersecurity.

The U.S. government has Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin working on numerous cyber security projects, although most of the projects are classified.  Industry analysts predict cyber security to one of the fastest-growing markets in the coming years, with the government issuing more than $10 billion in contracts over the next four years.

Security experts are still worried about the unprecedented level of vulnerability facing U.S. assets, as hackers have the potential to destroy banking records, stop electric power distribution, plus a number of other activities that could have a negative effect on the U.S.

In addition, China has drastically increased its cyber espionage, and continues to steal "vast amounts" of classified information from U.S. computer networks while the government continues to do little to stop it.

Obama will also focus on the physical protection of data -- it was recently published a New Zealand man purchased an MP3 player that contained troop deployments in Afghanistan, equipment deployments, private information on soldiers, and other personal information. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Resistence is futile...
By joex444 on 2/11/2009 12:14:26 PM , Rating: 2
Believe me I understand what you're saying. But if you let anyone just discard social security (some jobs, such as public school teachers, have retirement plans which substitute for SS and actually work), then you'll run into more problems. If we have a bunch of financially irresponsible people who have no retirement savings -- and if I have my figures correct, its nearly 50% that have no appreciable retirement plans by the age of 50 -- then they'll either be stuck working until they die or are physically unable to work. I'm fine with this as long as they know what they're getting themselves into. But, it is not socially responsible to let people do this to themselves. It would be like turning your back on an alcoholic, you aren't helping them you're just ignoring the problem. My point is that if you let people take all their money home and spend it on things TODAY they will have nothing for retirement when they can no longer work. This creates a huge social burden and we would then have to fund senior citizen welfare projects and the like. With this being the alternative to social security, I'll say that social security is broken, but its the best option we have. Companies have shown time and time again they are only interested in their own bottom line. The years of service you provide a corporation are meaningless to them, they would just as soon fire you three days before you are eligible to collect retirement to avoid paying you an annuity. Depending on companies is like relying on the devil, you're fucked either way.

RE: Resistence is futile...
By ebakke on 2/11/09, Rating: 0
"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki