Print 48 comment(s) - last by Dreifort.. on Feb 6 at 2:19 PM

MySpace and Facebook have been forced to clean house

MySpace has banned 90,000 sexual predators from its social networking web site, and has turned the names over to two different attorneys general offices, company officials recently announced.

The total number of 90,000 is twice as many as MySpace officials believed it had removed in 2008, with North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper and Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal leading the charge.

"Almost 100,000 convicted sex offenders mixing with children on MySpace -- shown by our subpoena -- is absolutely appalling and totally unacceptable," Blumenthal said in a statement issued to the press.  "For every one of them, there may be hundreds of others using false names and ages."

MySpace competitor Facebook, which is the No. 1 social networking web site in the world, have a combined 280 million users -- and the U.S. government wants both sites to do a better job of protecting children and teenagers from sexual predators.

Last year, both companies agreed to work with lawmakers to create security standards to help protect young people from online predators, after parents and politicians said the sites weren't doing enough.

"We've been working productively with Attorney General Blumenthal's office for more than three years on these issues," Facebook chief privacy officer Chris Kelly said in a published statement.  "They recently let us know that they are planning to send an updated subpoena."

Now that MySpace is done kicking 90,000 sexual predators off the internet, Facebook is expected to announce how many people it has removed sometime in the near future.

After the KIDS Act of 2007 was signed into law in 2008, all registered sex offenders must now submit real e-mail and instant messaging account information to the national sex offender registry.  This is done so sites such as MySpace and Facebook are able to better track sexual offenders.

It's unknown how many registered sex offenders use social networking web sites with false identities, so this ultimately is just the tip of the iceberg.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hm, not to fond of this...
By tastyratz on 2/4/2009 9:26:12 AM , Rating: 2
Your references are to the worst end when you sum up the whole.

I agree with you that someone in their 60s or 70s who are convicted of child molestation/rape should be labeled as such.

Should we glue a neon sign above their head equivocal to "rapist"
Fine by me.

This one just makes me happy your not a DA. The argument was a neon sign that says rapist above the head of someone who urinated on someones shoes raising a point that they are indeed not rapists.

RE: Hm, not to fond of this...
By mdogs444 on 2/4/2009 9:29:10 AM , Rating: 2
The argument was a neon sign that says rapist above the head of someone who urinated on someones shoes raising a point that they are indeed not rapists.

I didn't read the question as such, but if that's actually how you intended then I would say of course not. I've clearly stated in my above posts that public urination is not a sex crime, but rather public indecency. And as opposed to be labeled a "rapist", they should be charged with something similar to assault.

"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki