Print 48 comment(s) - last by Dreifort.. on Feb 6 at 2:19 PM

MySpace and Facebook have been forced to clean house

MySpace has banned 90,000 sexual predators from its social networking web site, and has turned the names over to two different attorneys general offices, company officials recently announced.

The total number of 90,000 is twice as many as MySpace officials believed it had removed in 2008, with North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper and Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal leading the charge.

"Almost 100,000 convicted sex offenders mixing with children on MySpace -- shown by our subpoena -- is absolutely appalling and totally unacceptable," Blumenthal said in a statement issued to the press.  "For every one of them, there may be hundreds of others using false names and ages."

MySpace competitor Facebook, which is the No. 1 social networking web site in the world, have a combined 280 million users -- and the U.S. government wants both sites to do a better job of protecting children and teenagers from sexual predators.

Last year, both companies agreed to work with lawmakers to create security standards to help protect young people from online predators, after parents and politicians said the sites weren't doing enough.

"We've been working productively with Attorney General Blumenthal's office for more than three years on these issues," Facebook chief privacy officer Chris Kelly said in a published statement.  "They recently let us know that they are planning to send an updated subpoena."

Now that MySpace is done kicking 90,000 sexual predators off the internet, Facebook is expected to announce how many people it has removed sometime in the near future.

After the KIDS Act of 2007 was signed into law in 2008, all registered sex offenders must now submit real e-mail and instant messaging account information to the national sex offender registry.  This is done so sites such as MySpace and Facebook are able to better track sexual offenders.

It's unknown how many registered sex offenders use social networking web sites with false identities, so this ultimately is just the tip of the iceberg.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hm, not to fond of this...
By mdogs444 on 2/4/2009 8:59:47 AM , Rating: -1
Ah yes, how ridiculous it is to have and share nude photographs of someone under legal age!

Granted, I see your point on this particular instance, the fact is that it needed to be brought into the light and her parents need to be aware of the situation. How do you know that the picture won't get into the hands of someone who would start stalking her because of it? A teacher, someone elses parent, etc?

Perhaps they shouldn't be charged with a sexual offense, but they need to be taught a lesson and shown that its not acceptable or safe, as well as making their parents aware of what is going on.

By SavagePotato on 2/4/2009 12:10:58 PM , Rating: 5
It is ridiculous to brand a 14 year old girl as a sex offender and distributor of child pornography for sending her teenage boyfriend a nude photo of herself. Yes lets brand a child as a potential child predator for the rest of her life with a sex offender title because of something like that.

But what else would you expect from the good old puritanical sexually repressed United States. To make sense? no not at all.

“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki