Print 45 comment(s) - last by Kefner.. on Feb 9 at 1:34 AM

The transition to a 64-bit world continues

With 64-bit adoption rising for both Windows Vista and Windows 7 installations, Sun Microsystems' latest update of Java 6 features enhanced 64-bit support.

Java 6 Update 12 will finally have a 64-bit plug-in, a feature that was first requested in January of 2003, as well as a 64-bit version of Webstart. Java Webstart enables the deployment of standalone Java software applications over a network or the internet.

The Java plug-in allows web browsers to run Java applications; a 64-bit plug-in is required for 64-bit browsers. It is included as part of the Java Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (Java SE).

If 32-bit and 64-bit browsers are to be used interchangeably, then both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the JRE must be installed as well.

Although the Java Runtime Environment had x64 versions for Linux, Solaris, and Windows, there were no 64-bit versions of the Java plug-in, Java Web Start or Java Control Panel. 32-bit versions of the JRE could be installed on 64-bit systems in order to obtain this functionality, but can only be used with 32-bit browsers.

The foundation for the 64-bit plug-in comes from the completely redesigned plug-in of Java 6 Update 10. The Java Virtual Machine running applets is isolated from the web browser at the operating system level. If an error occurs while running the applet, the new Java plug-in detects and handles the error. The web browser is unaffected, even if an uncooperative applet refuses to shut down.

Update 12 also features official Windows 2008 support, as well as improved application startup and runtime performance for both Java Webstart and JavaFX. There are no major security updates, but Update 12 contains 140 bugfixes.

Java 7, meanwhile, is tentatively scheduled for an early 2010 release.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By cheetah2k on 2/3/2009 8:30:57 PM , Rating: 1
Someone give this guy a 6! :-D

By grenableu on 2/3/2009 8:47:27 PM , Rating: 5
It's Pirks. Anything over a -1 is good news for him :))

By quiksilvr on 2/3/2009 9:05:52 PM , Rating: 5
Wow it IS Pirks, totally unexpected. But I agree; Adobe's laziness knows no bounds. What's even worse is their PDF reader. 200 MB for Adobe Reader 9?...WHY?! Foxit Reader is 10 MB and works seamlessly with Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari and IE as a plug in (not to mention infinitely faster than Adobe). You'd figure the guys that actually developed PDF would be able to give a better reader. Hell, even Office 2007 is space efficient, both with the installation and the files (Word, Excel and Powerpoint only take 250 MB of space, and that's WITH all of their templates and help menus and whatnot).

By GeorgeH on 2/3/2009 10:01:36 PM , Rating: 2
Want to know the sweet part? Fully half of that ~200MB is nothing but setup files that don't get cleaned up, and about half of the remaining ~100MB is nothing but plugins you'll never use.

By TomZ on 2/4/2009 12:14:42 PM , Rating: 2
Who cares if it is 10MB or 200MB? 200MB costs a couple of cents at today's HDD prices.

Not defending Adobe...I dislike them as much as anybody else...but HDD space doesn't seem like a reasonable attack vector.

By quiksilvr on 2/5/2009 10:07:05 PM , Rating: 2
More space = More RAM used = Less efficiency. Adobe Reader 8 took 120 MB and they magically 200 MB

By oab on 2/4/2009 1:07:35 AM , Rating: 2
Pirks has posted a total of 1987 comments at DailyTech, the average comment rating was 0.93.

You aren't far off.

By tastyratz on 2/3/2009 9:27:36 PM , Rating: 4
the 64 bit fiasco has become an embarrassment for adobe to trail so far behind in. This is beyond just inconvenient, its incompetent and reflects poorly on them. The 64 bit market is hardly flopping - its growing fast. They try to push to develop flash for blurays but don't have time to focus on 64 bit support??

By PhoenixKnight on 2/4/2009 9:35:51 AM , Rating: 2
What makes is saddest of all is that Adobe has a few programs (Photoshop, After Effects) that can very easily require far more than the 2-3GB of RAM that 32-bit programs are capable of using. Photoshop CS3 and CS4 get around the RAM limit by allocating memory past 3GB to be used as a scratch disk. Wouldn't the time spent on making a half-assed work-around have been better spent on making actual 64-bit versions of the programs? It's not like people haven't been demanding a 64-bit Photoshop for years now.

By Myrandex on 2/4/2009 1:36:14 PM , Rating: 2
Photoshop CS4 supports x64, however only GPU acceleration if Vista x64. I've used it...nice stuff there. The interface is fairly different though, very MACish.


"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki