backtop


Print 82 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Jan 29 at 11:06 PM

Senate grants Obama's wish to delay the digital transition, House votes on bill soon

TV viewers have been inundated with service announcements and coverage of the digital transition from analog to all digital TV broadcasts that is set to happen next month. Viewers who were using older TVs and don't get a converter or subscribe to pay-TV will lose the ability to watch free broadcast stations after the transition.

One of the first things that president Obama asked was to delay the digital transition to give Americans who weren't prepared more time to get ready. The government has been running a coupon program that gives people who need a converter box coupon to help pay for the cost of getting the needed converter.

The Senate drafted a bill last week that outlined a method for delaying the digital transition from February 17 to June 12 of 2009 to give viewers an extra four months to get a converter or subscribe to pat TV services.

MSNBC reports that the Senate has unanimously approved the bill to delay the transition to the June 12 date that the Obama administration wants. The delay is seen as a victory for the Obama administration and for Democrats in Congress who have been lobbying for a delay in the transition date.

The Nielsen Company performed a survey that found 6.5 million homes in America were unprepared for the digital transition and would lose the ability to watch TV after the transition. Funds in government coffers to help offset the cost of the converters for Americans dried up this month despite a long backlist of requests for the coupons.

Additional funds for the program are only being added as coupons that were requested and then not used expire after the 90-day usage window originally granted. The bill that was approved by the Senate will let those who asked for coupons and then didn’t use them apply for a new coupon. MSNBC reports that the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which is administering the coupon program, had 2.6 million coupon requests on its waiting list as of last week.

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller said, "Delaying the upcoming DTV switch is the right thing to do. I firmly believe that our nation is not yet ready to make this transition at this time."

VP of the digital TV transition for the National Association of Broadcasters Jonathan Collegio says that the numbers cited by Nielsen may overstate the number of people not ready for the digital transition. Collegio says that the numbers exclude consumers who have purchased a converter box, but not installed it as well as those who have requested a coupon and not received it.

Gene Kimmelman from the Consumers Union says, "The government has failed to deliver the converter boxes these [elderly and low-income] people deserve just to keep watching free, over-the-air broadcast signals."

Republicans in both the House and Senate are concerned that a delay in the transition will do nothing but confuse consumers and cost broadcasters money. Paula Kerger from the Public Broadcasting Service claims that delaying the digital transition from February to June 12 could cost public broadcasters $22 million.

Part of the wording in the Senate approved bill will let broadcasters who have already purchased the needed equipment for digital broadcasts to transition to all digital in February, even if the House votes to approve the delay in the transition. The House is expected to vote on the bill next week.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Its bigger than just TV
By mindless1 on 1/27/2009 10:44:02 AM , Rating: 1
1) Taxpayers ARE entitled to receive back useful services from their government, that's why we pay taxes. That "lowest common denominator", in most cases, also pays taxes. Suppose your taxes pay for something else you want more, like roads. Someone at home watching TV isn't getting as much use of the roads as someone out driving, so in theory those not watching TV might fairly pay more for that. It's beside the point though, keeping in mind #2.

2) Once again let me remind you that it's not your tax money paying for this, it was a condition of auctioning off the airwaves, what made it possible. A small % of those proceeds went to this. Not only did it cost you nothing in taxes, it REDUCED your tax burden if we want to arbitrarily think either way it would adjust the tax rates for anything.

It is acceptable to think like this, because it was the plan all along. Where have you been to not know this?


RE: Its bigger than just TV
By Suntan on 1/27/2009 11:04:57 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Once again let me remind you that it's not your tax money paying for this,


You talk as if you don’t understand the concept of pooling funds. Money spent by the government is money spent by the government.

You remind me of my sister’s white trash in-laws that wasted a couple of hundred dollars on renting a convertible for a vacation and thought it was alright because “they used their own money for it” even though they are in dept for thousands of dollars to my sister and her husband…

quote:
It is acceptable to think like this, because it was the plan all along. Where have you been to not know this?

If you are saying it was the plan all along to continuously let people off the hook for being lazy and irresponsible, I guess we haven’t read the same documents that our country is founded on.

-Suntan


RE: Its bigger than just TV
By MandrakeQ on 1/27/2009 12:48:45 PM , Rating: 1
The U.S. has been in debt for over 50 years. Maybe you should have complained earlier.


RE: Its bigger than just TV
By joex444 on 1/27/2009 8:15:01 PM , Rating: 2
Actually the US has always been in debt with the lone exception of one President -- Andrew Jackson. Every other time we've been in debt. Funny thing about the "debt" though... every time we come up with a federal budget and then exceed it, the overrun goes towards the national debt. This actually amounts to a substantial amount. So, yes, the national debt may be 1.6 trillion or so, but this isn't what we owe China. We owe a lot of it to ourselves (I doubt we'll pay it).

I think this delayed switch is the dumbest thing we could possibly do with respect to DTV. First, the 6.5 million households thing is an old figure -- it was being touted a few weeks back. Second, we've been telling people for months the switch is Feb 17th and you should go get a coupon if you don't have cable or satellite and you have an old TV. They even demonstrate this by showing us pictures of 1950s style cabinet TVs with the furniture look to them, the rounded screens which are of course B&W as well as elderly viewers. Could they make it any more obvious who needs these things?

All this delay is going to do is to let the procrastinators know that they have until June to get done what they should've done by now. This is not a motivation to go out and buy these boxes. Second they may be confused that their TV still works Feb 18th and figure they have a built in digital tuner so they don't need a box. Wait until June 12th and all hell breaks lose. Finally, after June 12th can you still get coupons? I mean, a lot of people are going to end up thinking they were all set because the transition was in Feb and their TV still works. Couple these people with the procrastinators who still won't have their damn box yet and you have a large influx of needy box customers who are simply puzzled and feel cheated or betrayed.

BTW, TV does carry important information. Think about how useful a radio would have been in WWII. That's like what a TV is now. Sure you have the Internet, but that's only available to about 50% of the population (somehow I doubt our ISP bills would go down by 50% when the other half of the country signs up), and while there is still the radio that is used only when the power goes out or your car doesn't have a CD player. Ultimately the broadcast stations are the link between society and your average citizen, especially the poor and elderly. Try explaining to your son why these people deserve less than everyone else.


RE: Its bigger than just TV
By Alexstarfire on 1/28/2009 3:43:20 AM , Rating: 2
Lol, $1.6 trillion. That's quite a conservative estimate on your part I believe. The national debt is over $10 trillion.


RE: Its bigger than just TV
By mindless1 on 1/27/2009 10:37:05 PM , Rating: 2
Wrong! There would be no income from sale of analog bandwidth, if there were not this minor concession in place to make it happen.

Fact is, if anything this whole program will have saved you and other taxpayers money, while also allowing new services.

Think of it a different way. You sell a widget. To make this widget you have to buy a part for it. The part costs $3, but the widget sells for $40. Once you have the part, you have almost no labor at all. It's nearly the best business model possible.

PS - this doesn't have squat to do with your sister's in-laws. This is a clear-cut case of the conditions upon which it would be possible to free up the airwaves for auction. You really should spend the time to educate yourself on the specifics if you doubt this.


RE: Its bigger than just TV
By Suntan on 1/28/2009 11:17:43 AM , Rating: 2
You really should spend some time reviewing grade school math.

A widget that costs $3 to make and sells for $40 is still not as profitable as a widget that costs $2 to make and still sells for $40.

You talk as if you've only ever received money from the governement and never had to pay money to it. Carry on being a drag on society.

-Suntan


RE: Its bigger than just TV
By mindless1 on 1/29/2009 11:06:13 PM , Rating: 2
You still lack basic comprehension of the issue, which was that those who would have done without, have a coupon. It was "spend $3 per widget or quit, $2 isn't gonna get the widget built".

You are a fool to think I, or anyone else who is employed, only ever received, and could possibly receive more than they'd paid. There are so many projects the government is involved in that I completely disagree with, that even though the argument about taxes was a non-starter, you are still terribly wrong.

I'll tell you what, let's start by itemizing every single thing that you benefit from and then argue that you should do without those things for your tax dollars. How about roads, military defense, things that preserve the function of the society in which you earn money that seems so precious to you that it blinds you from reality even after having your hand held while it was explained again (because apparently for some people, Google searching can't find this basic information?).


"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki