Print 44 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Jan 29 at 11:52 PM

The market for netbooks is expected to hit 139 million by 2013

The netbook category is the hottest computer category posting the largest growth numbers in all of the market. Many consumers are choosing netbooks because they offer a low price entry into computing. Some are buying netbooks not for the price, but for the portability that the machines offer.

ABI Research announced today that it expects 35 million netbooks to ship in 2009. According to the research firm, social and technological factors have worked together to create a sort of perfect storm for the netbook market in the next few years.

Forecasts by the research firm predict that by 2013 139 million netbooks will be shipping. ABI's Kevin Burden said in a statement, "PDA’s began our reliance on instant accessible data while traveling. When PDA functionality converged with cellular voice, smartphones became the new darling of mobile professional technology that many expected to evolve into the hub for all data and communication needs for travelling professionals. Today, with a better understanding for what a smartphone is, is not, and may never be, along with a reality check on the usefulness of UMPCs, the market remains open for new device types."

Burden points out that low-cost and power miserly x86 and ARM CPUs has been the key to the netbook revolution. These processors allow users to get very close to their normal desktop or notebook computer experience in a much smaller package that offers longer battery life in most instances.

Burden continued saying, "In recent years, the industry still expected the smartphones to be more than they turned out to be, and most recently, MIDs were thought to be the next big mobile devices segment, but an unclear usage model continues to confuse the market. So today, netbooks’ time has come, and ABI research expects them to enjoy very strong market growth."

However, some analysts predict that increasing sales of netbooks is a bad thing for the CPU market. As the majority of sales begins to center on low-cost, and low profit netbook CPUs sales of more profitable CPUs may drop.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Translation
By Moishe on 1/26/2009 2:37:13 PM , Rating: 2
Ridiculous statement.

We do need more cores. The difference is that all computers are not created for all tasks. I need multi-cores for DVR, gaming, etc. I use my netbook for studying and mobile computing.

separate uses.

RE: Translation
By Suntan on 1/26/2009 6:39:07 PM , Rating: 2
I didn't say *all* computers.

However, I would guess there are many more computers pulling heavy duty checking email and playing a game of solitaire for every computer that gets used for truly intensive applications.

Sorry, but "most" consumers had more than enough with the old P-M single core chips.


RE: Translation
By mindless1 on 1/27/2009 1:17:26 AM , Rating: 2
Most consumers have more than enough with a 1GHz P3. They get something new only because their old system broke and replacing parts would've been time consuming (or beyond their skill level) and costly while the other parts were also aging towards end of life.

RE: Translation
By mindless1 on 1/27/2009 1:15:23 AM , Rating: 2
You might've been duped into believing you "need" multi-cores, but the fact is people were doing DVR, gaming, etc, before we had multicore processors on PCs. The idea a computer MUST be as fast as possible is incorrect. It merely needs be fast enough. If we didn't have multicore CPUs the games you see barely running on them would have simply been designed to be less demanding of processors, or vice-versa, if CPUs were 6X as fast today as they are, games would've been that much more demanding than they are.

RE: Translation
By masher2 on 1/27/2009 2:09:30 AM , Rating: 2
If we didn't have multicore CPUs the games you see barely running on them would have simply been designed to be less demanding of processors
And would have had fewer features, less realistic graphics, sparser content, less intelligent AI, and/or some combination of the above.

The same goes for most any other genre of software. Developers aren't simply writing their code slower to counteract faster processors. They're using those extra cycles to offer you more features or power. Yes, even things like web browsing and watching videos. If you doubt this, try loading up a flash-heavy site on your old Pentium-3, or playing an H.264-encoded HD video stream on it. You won't be terribly impressed by the results.

RE: Translation
By Suntan on 1/27/2009 10:02:07 AM , Rating: 2
Developers aren't simply writing their code slower to counteract faster processors....

...try loading up a flash-heavy site

Interesting that you site an Adobe product in the same post that you argue about code efficiency…


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken
Related Articles

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki