backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by squirrelfriend.. on Jan 27 at 7:38 PM

Professor observes a large proportion of criticism of violent games come from the over 35 age demographic

Texas A&M International University professor Christopher Ferguson conducted a study and concluded there is "no significant relationship" between school shootings and playing violent video games. Highlights of the study were summarized by Gamepolitics.

Ferguson's study criticizes the methodology used by past studies that have linked violent video games to aggression. He points out for recent high profile shootings such as the Virginia Tech massacre, and the Utah Trolley Stop mall shooting no evidence of violent video game play by the perpetrator was found.  

Ferguson suggests video games are an easy target to attack for politicians, the news media, and social scientists. He also suggests self serving motivations are what drive these groups. Politicians are motivated by the need to create an appearance they are taking action against crime, for the news media negative news 'sells' better than positive news, for social scientists, it has been observed that a small group of researchers have been most vocal in promoting the anti-game message.  In comparison he states, "Actual causes of violent crime, such as family environment, genetics, poverty, and inequality, are oftentimes difficult, controversial, and intractable problems."

A very interesting observation Ferguson makes is that the majority of individuals critical of video games are above the age of 35 and have not directly experienced the game they are criticizing which some admit to. According to Ferguson, "commentators make claims betraying their unfamiliarity, such as that games like Grant Theft Auto ‘award points’ for antisocial behavior... despite that few games award points for anything anymore, instead focusing on stories." 

As an example of individuals who criticize games without verifying their claims, Ferguson points to the Cooper Lawrence, Mass Effect incident. Without playing the game Cooper Lawrence declared Mass Effect as pornography on Fox News. The resulting backlash forced Lawrence to recant her statements.

Ferguson summarized his findings stating, "The wealth of evidence... fails to establish a link between violent video games and violent crimes, including school shootings. The link has not merely been unproven; I argue that the wealth of available data simply weighs against any causal relationship."

With regards to school shootings he declares, "School shootings, although exceedingly rare, are an important issue worthy of serious consideration. However, for our understanding of this phenomenon to progress, we must move past the moral panic on video games and other media and take a hard look at the real causes of serious aggression and violence."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Personaly ...
By Dreifort on 1/26/2009 10:08:50 AM , Rating: 1
School shootings usually involve peer pressure. Someone is perceived better than me, so I am going to shoot them to show them who is better. Almost pure jealousy or hatred toward those who outwardly show themselves as being "better".

While this same ideology could also explain extreme-Islamic violence (especially against the US), it is usually a different reasoning for Religious violence.

Violence and Religion usually pertain to difference of who is wrong or right. Not about who is better than me. You can be dirt poor or filthy rich. But if you worship a diff god, then most (not all) religions will react violently...physically or verbally.


RE: Personaly ...
By afkrotch on 1/26/2009 11:50:06 AM , Rating: 1
I wouldn't say any religion does anything. Condemn the few extremists, not the religion as a whole. Well, except for maybe Scientology.


RE: Personaly ...
By MrPoletski on 1/26/2009 11:56:47 AM , Rating: 1
I agree.

The thing about scientology is that you need to be some kind of extremist not to see through that crap.


RE: Personaly ...
By Triple Omega on 1/26/2009 3:53:33 PM , Rating: 2
Well the problem with that is that those "few extremists" can have a big influence. Enough of an influence to start entire (cival-)wars. Just look at Northern Ireland for example. It may start with a few extremists, but that doesn't mean it can't grow from there.

This is the main reason why I think organised religion is one of the worst things to happen to the world, next to religious people (trying to) enforcing there beliefs and values on non-religious people and people of different religions.(abortion, gay-marriage, stemcell-research, euthanasia, etc.) There are religions that do not have these problems, but they are a minority.

Also if you look a little farther into the past you can see that religions as a whole most definately did preform actions. Just a few hundred years ago the pope was still calling crusades and those weren't just supported by a few extremists. No, they were full blown armies. Actually they were one of the strongest forms of military action of the day.

So in the end most religions did and do try to enforce there ways onto others and have and can still start full blown (civil-)wars. So I think religion as a whole has done and will do more harm then good.

A little reading material on religious wars:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_war


"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki