 Apple is finally allowing browsers, like those shown here, on the iPhone. Wondering why you've never heard of any of them? Apple is only allowing third party browsers based on its Safari webkit, which means no Firefox, Opera, or Chrome.
Apple opens gate to independent software companies to publish browsers with a significant catch
Since the App Store for the iPhone and iPod Touch debuted, it has been a runaway hit selling millions of apps and spawning an entirely new software industry. However, Apple has developed a reputation over the course of last year as a bit of a dictator when it comes to the app store. Apple was quick to shoot down any applications which it found offensive or which it felt might interfere with its own apps. That meant competitive internet browsers or music players were less than welcome at the store.
When it comes to internet browsers, Apple has announced that it will finally be relenting, but only somewhat. Apple is dropping its "duplication of functionality" clause, and as of yesterday has began to approve several "new" browsers that had been gathering dust the last couple months.
The catch -- and it’s a big one -- is that all the browsers it’s approving are based on Apple’s Safari. For those expecting Firefox, Chrome, or Opera, you are in for a disappointment.
Meet Apple's new browsers: there's the "Edge" browser, which is a plainer looking browser without Safari's chrome, there's the privacy inclined "Incognito", there's the vibration-countering "Shaking Web", and there's an enhanced tab browser "WebMate". The apps are all built, though, on Safari's WebKit and are thus Apple-powered.
While it might seem like the new browsers are akin to Safari extensions, unlike extensions, they're considered fully fledged apps. And that means you can only run one at a time. Really, the new browsers aren't even that new in a sense as the NYT, AP, and USA Today apps all used the Safari WebKit to improve their functionality.
The only difference is that the change opens the door to new products which could, in a respect replace Apple's base product, the Safari browser. While Apple will likely get a slice of the revenue if one of them takes off, it will be a smaller slice, and it will have less control.
With many users reporting the stock Safari to be buggy and glitch-prone, the idea of independent developers being able to improve it, a la Firefox, is a welcome one to many. Additionally, it seems like it will only be a matter of time before Firefox, Opera and others are fully allowed. However, Apple is known to keep its users hoping in vain, so that's by no means a sure bet.
"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton
|
Most Popular ArticlesHigh School Student Creates Storage Device that Can Charge in 20 Seconds May 20, 2013, 6:51 AM Apples Tries to Use Decade-Old Patents to Ban Samsung Galaxy S IV May 22, 2013, 3:00 PM NASA Awards $125,000 Grant for 3D Printed Food on Long-Term Space Travels May 21, 2013, 1:32 PM Microsoft Announces Voice-Controlled "Xbox One" May 21, 2013, 12:55 AM Cure For Baldness Could Be on Store Shelves within Two Years May 22, 2013, 8:29 AM
|