backtop


Print 23 comment(s) - last by Jansen.. on Feb 14 at 2:01 PM

Internal RAID 0 from $200

The Apex series was first seen at CES and falls between their high end Vertex series, which features up to 64 MB of cache, and their low end Solid and Core series. The Vertex 2 series, which will be announced at a later date, will eventually use a RAID 0 controller as well to increase performance.

With read speeds of up to 230 MB/s and write speeds of up to 160 MB/s at half the cost of Intel's X-25M 160GB, OCZ presents a very compelling upgrade solution. Seek times are less than 0.3ms, while the 60GB drive only weighs 77 grams -- the SSD is shock resistant to 1500 Gs.

The only thing that could throw a wrench in the works is random write speed, which has been a problem with MLC chips in the past, even with a properly working controller. That was the reason that OCZ developed the Vertex line specifically with built in cache, which makes a lot of sense considering how low DRAM prices have dropped.

According to OCZ, the Apex series uses an updated JMicron and MLC chips to keep costs down and reach higher capacities.

All Apex Series drives come with a two year warranty. Retail availability is expected by the end of January. More detail on OCZ's Apex product page.

If you consider the chart below, you are paying an extra $50 for 32MB of cache on the 60GB Vertex model while losing RAID. On the 120GB model, the price difference is $100, while on the 250GB model the difference drops down to $40. However, RAIDing two 30GB Vertex drives together will only cost you an extra $10 over a 60GB Vertex drive, if you already have a RAID controller. RAIDing two 60GB Vertex drives will cost an extra $30 over a single 120GB drive.

  Size

     Apex  

     Vertex    

  30 GB

      NA

      $129

  60 GB

     $199

      $249

  120 GB

     $370      

      $469

  250 GB   

     $830   

      $869      

All prices are MSRP.

 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

200MB/sec
By vladio on 1/14/2009 8:03:39 PM , Rating: 1
Q: what we need
A: sustainablewritespeed > 200MB/sec...
all xm-mmm and talk after that.




RE: 200MB/sec
By sleepeeg3 on 1/19/2009 9:26:37 AM , Rating: 2
What we need is for manufacturers to start refining SLC and driving the costs down there. Consumer ignorance is choosing the crappier technology for us again.

Well I am hoping they will use MLC to drive NAND costs down and are able to use the same chips to bring on SLC as a “new” technology, once SSDs reach mainstream affordability.


RE: 200MB/sec
By mindless1 on 2/7/2009 12:23:13 PM , Rating: 2
Forget about SLC, give us twice the MLC chips = twice the capacity, then double the channels on the controller and add $2 worth of addt'l DRAM cache.

Presently, SLC makes little sense unless you need the fastest write speed possible in the smallest space possible (far smaller than the cavity of a 2.5" SSD). That is, at least until we move beyond SATA300.


"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen

Related Articles
OCZ Vertex SSDs Delayed
January 13, 2009, 9:43 AM
Intel Ships Pricey 160GB SSD
December 23, 2008, 11:14 AM
OCZ Launches Vertex Series SSDs
December 11, 2008, 11:44 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki