Print 61 comment(s) - last by Constitutional.. on Jan 5 at 9:41 PM

  (Source: The Drunken Clam Dot Com)
Privacy advocates concerned about a strict new law in Georgia which removes sex offender's online privacy

The latest scuffle over online privacy is brewing up in Georgia.  An aggressive new law is set to take effect today which will force sex offenders to hand over their internet passwords, screen names, and e-mail addresses to the government for monitoring purposes.  Several other states also have efforts that track sex offender's email and screen names.  However, Georgia, which has 16,000 registered offenders, will be the first state to demand the sex offenders’ passwords as well.

A similar law in Utah was already struck down by a federal judge, who ruled that it violated the privacy rights of an offender who challenged it.  However, that ruling was rather narrow as it applied to an offender tried on a military conviction who had never been in Utah's court or prison system.

Critics of the Georgian law say that it not only violates the privacy rights of offenders, but it also places undue stress on the already tight-for-cash Georgian law enforcement.  Sara Totonchi of the Atlanta-based Southern Center for Human Rights states, "There's certainly a privacy concern.  This essentially will give law enforcement the ability to read e-mails between family members, between employers."

State Sen. Cecil Staton (R.) who wrote the bill argues that it is necessary to strip the rights of some citizens to protect the rights to life and liberty of others, particularly children.  He states that the benefits of the bill, which will allow law enforcement to detect stalking by predators sooner "outweighs a lot of the rights of these individuals."

He states, "We limit where they can live, we make their information available on the Internet. To some degree, we do invade their privacy.  But the feeling is, they have forfeited, to some degree, some privacy rights."

Most states do compromise sex offenders’ privacy to some extent by making their addresses available online in registries.  However, Georgia and Utah are the only states to propose legislation to take offenders passwords, according to civil rights researchers.  Others argue the bill isn't tough enough.  While the bill threatens violators with a possible return to prison, some believe this won't deter many.

Says State Sen. Staton, "My hunch is, where there's a will, there's a way.  If people are intent on violating this law, there are many different ways. What's important is we have given law enforcement a tool."

One critical issue at stake with the Georgian law is lack of specificity.  While the law is clearly meant to target offenders seeking to exploit children, it does not differentiate by crime.  Thus those found guilty of underage consensual sex, public indecency, or other sex crimes will likely be forced to turn over their passwords as well, bringing into question whether the law is targeting who it intends to.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I know the solution
By Reclaimer77 on 1/3/2009 2:27:11 PM , Rating: 2
Worse than mass murderers? Tortuous dictators that enslave entire societies? You have quite the warped world view my friend.

Why do you keep bringing up murderers ? This topic is NOT about them. Obviously if I'm in favor of executing child rapists, I'm in favor of capital punishment for murders. How thick are you ?

Our justice system is meant to clean people up...

Some people can't be " cleaned up ".

Granted if they repeat offend then they are beyond our current scope of rehabilitation, so death would be the only logical choice as I stated previously.

There is no such thing as a "one time" sex offender. Unless you just mean times they have actually been caught.

Move to one of the fabulous Middle Eastern countries, I'm sure they would go right along with you. Of course they will change the term rape to be OK as long as you are a man following some indoctrinated drivel, but you seem like the kind of fellow that is OK with that. By their standards, everyone is "liberal", you will feel right at home.

Yay ultra extreme arguments help your case ?

Again, I'm not sitting here pushing for it in case you didn't notice. I simply said I wouldn't have a problem with executing them. Call it apathy, but honestly, I can't defend the scum and I wouldn't care if they were executed.

Maybe you are a bit apathetic too ?

Molesting a child is no different than raping an adult, it is merely rape, which is assault at best.

"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki