Print 32 comment(s) - last by DontUhatePants.. on Jan 7 at 1:58 AM

Ocean Power Technologies, whose power-generating test buoy is pictured here, has been forced to deploy its technology in New Zealand and Australia, due to an ocean power licensing bureaucratic mess here in the U.S.  (Source: Ocean Power Technologies)
Political bickering may hold up plans to deploy and test new wave power technologies to the U.S.

When it comes to alternative energy, President-elect Barack Obama and his team, as in other tech fields, is stating that the time for change is now.  As part of his team's program, which encompasses wind, solar, and examining clean nuclear options, the team is turning its sights to ocean power.

Countries like Britain and Portugal have already jumped on exploiting the vast amount of energy in the ocean.  Powered by the gravitational pull of the moon, the Earth's tides carry a vast amount of energy, almost entirely untapped by current generators.  While the challenge of deploying a device out at sea that can withstand the elements and deliver power to the main land is considerable, many companies have already tackled the problem with innovative designs.

According to New York-based Environmental Defense Fund, a non-profit environmental advocacy organization, U.S. ocean power efforts, on the other hand, are stuck in a political mire.  The group met with President-elect Obama and his advisors to help them realize the nature of this problem.

In the U.S., two branches of government have been granted conflicting jurisdiction over the seas:  the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Minerals Management Service, part of the Department of the Interior.  The result has been a squabble over who's in charge of approving projects which has been unable to be resolved thus far.

The Minerals Management Service gained the power to issue licenses to alternative energy projects on the outer continental shelf, 3 to 200 miles off shore, with the Energy Policy Act of 2005.  That law, however, failed to eliminate the preexisting licensing authority granted to FERC.  Now both organizations claim they have the right to issue the license.

Thus far, both organizations have been unable to resolve the territory battle.  What has resulted is that funding for U.S. ocean-based alternative energy projects has dried up due to uncertainty about licensing.

The coalition pleading their case before President-elect Obama was composed of officials from local governments, utilities, environmental groups and ocean power companies, including Pennington, N.J.-based Ocean Power Technologies (OPTT).

If something is not done to clean up the mess, these groups say, the U.S. will lose its alternative energy lead to foreign competitors. Ocean Power Technologies is illustrating this as it is currently pulling some of its U.S. projects and has recently announced major projects in Australia and New Zealand.

The problem is among the toughest challenges to face the transition team, led by incoming Energy Secretary Steven Chu, currently a Professor of Physics and Molecular and Cellular Biology of University of California, Berkeley.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Seashell07 on 12/26/2008 9:32:09 PM , Rating: 2
Obama has two chances of changing things in Washington, slim and none. He has many more chances of bringing the country closer to Socialism. New York City and California are the two most Socialist entities we have and both of them are taxing the productivity out of it's citizens trying to pay for it. They both are fighting a losing battle. Our government both parties have spent the country into a debt that some say is more than the country is worth. Yep Obama will have his hands full. To him I say good luck.

RE: Washington
By andrinoaa on 12/27/2008 8:06:15 AM , Rating: 1
I don't get your attitude. You oked the other fuckwit to stay in for 8 years, but you don't give the new guy a go.
Socialist? Don't crap on man, you wouldn't know what it was.
If your last fuckwit didn't go to war in Iraq, you would still be in paradise, lol. If you killed the war machine, your taxes would be so much lower. You wouldn't have a growing army of crippled veterans , to name just one benefit. I guess you reap what you sow.

RE: Washington
By Gary Right On on 12/27/08, Rating: 0
RE: Washington
By andrinoaa on 12/30/2008 3:25:25 AM , Rating: 2
Ok, he is a genius! Happy now? If he is an idiot, why are you guys so scared to call a spade a spade? It doesn't happen were I come from, if they are incompetant , we let them know. Nothing to do with hate, life is too short to let the lunatics loose.

"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki