backtop


Print 30 comment(s) - last by Etsp.. on Dec 28 at 10:02 PM

Consumer advocacy group calls for Google to adopt an easy zero day data retention "opt out" provision

One of the most controversial topics online is privacy.  On the one hand there are the advertisers and content providers (and those who do both) like Google.  They say that keeping user statistics is essential to offering more effective advertising, which in turn is key to generating more revenue and being able to provide users with more content.

However, to some users and consumer advocacy groups data retention, particularly by search engine giants like Yahoo and Google, represents a cohesive invasion of privacy that would not have been possible offline.  They say that the potential for abuse of information such as medical searches is too great and that search engines should cut down on their data retention and anonymize data.  Anonymous data would allow for slightly more effective ads than unresearched advertising, but it would be less effective than user targeted ads.  It’s a necessary loss, say some.

One consumer advocacy group is making waves by demanding the internet's largest information gatherer -- Google -- give users an easy way of opting out of data collection entirely.  Consumer Watchdog President Jamie Court and Policy Advocate John M. Simpson sent a letter to Google, asking that the company allow users a way to block Google from gathering information on users' search queries, IP addresses and cookies. 

In its most recent letter, addressed to Google CEO Eric Schmidt, Consumer Watchdog states, "We call on you to offer Google's users such a clearly identifiable "opt out" function on its search engine that is essentially a zero personal data retention policy."

Consumer Watchdog suggests that Google adopt an easy opt out similar to Ask.com's AskEraser.  It seems unlikely that Google would want to model itself after such a business, however.

Google arranged a meeting in October to try to sooth Consumer Watchdog, but since the pair's interactions have been rife with frustration.  Google implies (PDF) that the group does not understand how its Chrome browser's privacy functions and its Suggest feature work.  Consumer Watchdog has written another letter to Google (PDF) accusing it of misdirection and feigned innocence, saying that Google's letter "rebuts issues we have not raised and misstates our position."

The group has called for an after-Christmas meeting with Google.  However, given their past interaction, it seems unlikely that either party will get what they want this Christmas -- in Google's case Consumer Watch shutting up, and in Consumer Watch's case an opt out concession from Google.

Google currently has cut its data retention time to 9 months.  Yahoo recently one-upped Google by cutting its own data retention time to 3 months.

Yahoo, Google, and fellow rival Microsoft will likely face tough questions when the European Commission has a working party meeting in February on the topic of data retention.  The EC has called for, but not legislated a 6 month data retention period.  The governing body of Europe may look to force the search leaders' hands, which may in turn have a ripple effect on business in America and elsewhere.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Privacy is necessary
By hitman699 on 12/24/2008 12:42:17 PM , Rating: 2
First off google is huge.. They are my email provider and reccomend I never delete my messages so that they have every single email conversation I have had on file,they are my search provider and keep track of every search I make, they carry my telephone calls with grand central and have a copy of every voicemail I recieve, number that calls me or number they I call.. provide 411 services that can record my voice when I call it to look up places and they know whether I looked up the address of the local strip club for instance.. They also know everywhere that I go when I use google maps and they have the money to buy out any innovate firm that offers a competing service, then use that to track my activities for advertising purposes...they have more information on each individual then the central intelligence agency or the national security agency.. but really no oversight as to what they do with it..

and not to sound like a conspiracy theorist. but with one executive order..in the interest of "national security", "fighting terrorism" or for "helping the children".. and all that data could become property of my uncle sam or china etc... sorry google has a responsibility to not record information on me or anyone else.. switching providers is not an option as they all do it.. because they can.. legislation needs to be setup that says you cannot record that vast amount of information on american citizens and store it.. even for 9 months...or 3 months... I personally hope the europeans have the balls to force them to not store information on people. IF they have to become a paid service.. so be it

at the very least.. there should be a delete button that purges any data about me whenever I choose to. and its gone permenently..




RE: Privacy is necessary
By Darkk on 12/27/2008 4:19:41 PM , Rating: 2
Nahh.. Online storage is so cheap they can afford to keep EVERYTHING forever.

Case in point, look at your own hard drive and My Documents. Noticed how much stuff you've accumulated over the years you didn't bother to delete anything? Including e-mails?

Hell, I got e-mails going back 10 years!!

If it's not google then somebody out there is recording everything you do and say forever.



"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki