backtop


Print 68 comment(s) - last by nah.. on Dec 24 at 9:42 PM


The world's first tunable glasses, invented by retired Oxford professor Joshua Silver, may look clunky and archaic, but their cheap easily-adjustable design could correct the vision of a billion people living in the third world, and may allow them to continue to work. More importantly they will contribute to Third World literacy.  (Source: Engadget)
The world's first fully tunable lenses could soon be making a world of a difference

Here in the U.S. we take for granted many of the necessities of life.  However, across the world billions living in Third World countries and developing nations have trouble obtaining basic needs.  Something as simple as finding clean drinking water can be impossible.  Basic medical care is scarce.  And those with poor vision are forced to endure as glasses are typically far too expensive.

A new invention could fix that last problem and bring vision to as many as a billion worldwide -- the world's first fully tunable prescription-free glasses.

The tunable glasses were invented by retired Oxford University physic professor Joshua Silver.  He devised the lenses in a moment he called a "glimpse of the obvious".  He sees them hitting the market in about a decade and bringing improved vision to about a billion living in poverty worldwide.  With vision a key to literacy, these new lenses could make a world of difference.

The new lenses can be tuned via simple mechanical motions to correct for both near-sighted and far-sighted vision.  Professor Silver has been developing them for over two decades now, ever since a 1985 conversation with a colleague hatched the idea in his mind.

Now at last he has a cheap, easily mass-produced design largely worked out.  His lenses use liquid lenses which inject or remove liquid to adjust the thickness of the lens.  Thicker lenses are more powerful, while thinner lenses are weaker.  By adjusting the thickness, typically done by cutting to a prescription, the proper vision correction is achieved.  However, the new lenses can be adjusted freely.

The glasses' liquid lenses are encased in tough plastic, which protects the delicate lens sacs.  A small dial on each arm pumps a small syringe which adds or removes fluid from the lens sac.  These syringe/dial setup can be easily removed after the proper adjustment is achieved, saving on costs.

Britain's Department for International Development has begun a trial deployment of the glasses, and has already distributed thousand of pairs in Third World countries.  Professor Silver is determined to ramp up production to millions of units.

Professor Silver is touched and inspired by stories such as that of Henry Adjei-Mensah, a tailor in Ghana who fell into poverty when he was forced to retire at an early age for lack of glasses.  He describes, "So he retires. He was about 35. He could have worked for at least another 20 years. We put these specs on him, and he smiled, and threaded his needle, and sped up with this sewing machine. He can work now. He can see."

He is currently readying a program in India which will deploy a million units a year.  He wants to eventually release a level of 100 million units a year, with 1 billion distributed by 2020 as his chief goal.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By ThePooBurner on 12/23/2008 1:59:56 PM , Rating: 2
This is what we call the result of "bad breeding." Let me elaborate on that a bit in the context of your question. With Darwinism the strongest and best survive while the weak die off, leaving only the best genes in the pool with constant refinement. Contrast that with how many babies are saved from death at birth due to the advances of medicine, the number of cancer survivors for the same reason, the number of... you get the point. The advances in medicine to save lives, many of which have huge impacts on the world as a whole, have also caused the same weakening of the gene pool that is allowing such negatives as horrible eyes to become a problem. We've simply traded one thing, or rather one set of positives/negatives, for another. Good genes and less defects, not necessarily brains VS Poorer genes and more defects but potentially more brain power. For example someone like Hawking who has helped advance science would have never made it under the old rules, but thanks to the trade off we get to benefit from his genius. This is a bit of a general example, and there are other ways in which having more people around is a good thing (I think the care for some of the less fortunate allows the best to come out in people that might not have otherwise come out in the old way.).

Hopefully that does a bit to help answer your question. And so i don't get rated down for no reason: "bad breeding" is "bad" in terms of successful darwinism.


"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki