Print 35 comment(s) - last by mars777.. on Dec 24 at 6:03 PM

While foreign nations such as China are amassing legions of trained cyber combatants, recent war games have shown the U.S. woefully underprepared to defend itself against and retaliate in reponse to cyber attacks. Such attacks could soften U.S. defenses or merely yield a steady stream of leaked technical information.
The U.S. is alarmingly vulnerable to foreign cyber assaults, but will local governments spend the billions needed to shore up defenses

One of the most difficult challenges facing the U.S. government today is the constant threat of cyber attacks from tech savvy rivals such as China.  Freelance cyber "guns for hire" foreign nations can steal information, undermine the national economy, and spy on our nation's military readiness with little fear of retaliation.  While the armed forces and U.S. intelligence agencies have invested large amounts of money in preventing such breaches, a recent war game highlighted just how soft the U.S. is when it comes to cyber defense.

Last Thursday wrapped up a two-day war game testing our nation's cyber security readiness against hostile threats.  The exercise, perhaps the largest and most ambitious yet, was carried out by 230 representatives of government defense and security agencies, private companies and civil groups.  The conclusion -- the U.S. is unprepared to defend itself against cyber attackers.

The war game highlighted numerous problems
including flaws in leadership, planning, communications and other issues, according to the testers.  Experts note some improvements since a year ago when President George W. Bush instituted a broad new cybersecurity initiative.  However, they say that the defenses are still far from adequate.  Senior vice president Mark Gerencser of the Booz Allen Hamilton consulting service who hosted the games states, "There isn't a response or a game plan.  There isn't really anybody in charge."

Democratic U.S. Rep. James Langevin of Rhode Island, chair of the Homeland Security subcommittee on cybersecurity, woefully concurred, "We're way behind where we need to be now.  This is equivalent in my mind to before Sept. 11 ... we were awakened to the threat on the morning after Sept. 11."

U.S. Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the Democratic chairman of the Intelligence subcommittee on Technical Intelligence, says that billions must be poured into shoring up the cyber defenses which is currently full of holes.  Rep. Ruppersberger cites the recent cyber warfare campaign by Russian supporters in Estonia and Georgia as an example of how devastating foreign cyber assaults can be on an unprepared nation.

The war games were set in a very applicable scenario -- escalating attacks during a period of economic instability.  Participants had to try to work together to develop strategies to fight the attacks.  The test was perhaps the largest to date as it encompassed both the free market and the government sectors.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff at the end of the exercise signed off warning participants that cyber attacks will be used in the future to soften nations in preparation for invasion.  They will also become a tool used by terrorists, he warns.  New international laws and military doctrines must be put in place, he believes, to prevent unchecked aggression and cyber arms races.  Uncertainty is a critical flaw without government's current defense plan, he believes.  He states, "We know that if someone shoots missiles at us, they're going to get a certain kind of response. What happens if it comes over the Internet?"

There is dissent, though on how to solve the problem.  Rep. Ruppersberger believes a "cybersecurity czar" is the best solution as it will give the president a direct line to the critical state of the nation's network defenses.  However, Chertoff and Gerencser do not currently support this idea.

Rep. Ruppersrberger did state optimism that the state of cyber security can change, and praised President-elect Barack Obama for making cybersecurity a major priority thus far.

However, there are many tricky issues that remain, such as the question of how to finance the massive government-sponsored security overhaul needed and how to answer public doubts.  While one-party regimes such as China, have found it easy to force such efforts on the public, here in the U.S. convincing the public that such initiatives are necessary and positive is a much taller order.  Many are uneasy with the expansion of government and decreased privacy rights that such initiatives would yield.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Bloated & inefficient
By crystal clear on 12/23/2008 9:36:10 AM , Rating: 1
U.S. Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the Democratic chairman of the Intelligence subcommittee on Technical Intelligence, says that billions must be poured into shoring up the cyber defenses which is currently full of holes.

Pouring (billions) more money/funds doesnt solve the problem.

Funds are needed elsewhere from the bailout packages to the "economic stimulus package" to education,health etc etc.

There are no spare funds & cost cutting across the board is needed in those bloated & ineffcient Govt depts.

Get better/more value for the money/funds currently allocated to every dept.

Make people in the depts work harder-better-faster & those not fit should be fired.

Intelligent use of funds/money is the keyword to the problem.


1) FIRE all those responsible for cyber security as they have failed to do their job/duties & hire NEW better qualified & capable personnel to deal with the problem.

2) Reorganize & restructore the dept responsible for cyber security.

3) Funding should come from existing budgets by cutting 5 % or more from every dept & transfering it to this effort/issue of cyber security.

4) Set aside/allocate funds from the above for R&D in cyber security to be allocated to universities in the USA

5) Use existing technologies available from companies specializing in cyber security by sub contracting portion of the work to setup/build cyber defences or shield. (call it what ever you like)

Remember its the tax payers money ....there has to be accountability & efficiency in the working of govt depts.

RE: Bloated & inefficient
By Ringold on 12/23/2008 1:53:34 PM , Rating: 2
3) Funding should come from existing budgets by cutting 5 % or more from every dept & transfering it to this effort/issue of cyber security.

Shadowy government assassins are enroute to your location now for suggesting such blasphemy. The solution to every problem is of course billions of dollars. Not millions or hundreds of millions, but b illions of dollars, as well as the creation of a new unelected federal government position and a new supporting bureaucracy to support him/her.

On a more serious note, I like the BSG approach to network security. Network security? What network?!

"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki