backtop


Print 63 comment(s) - last by HrilL.. on Jan 12 at 6:32 AM


  (Source: Reuters)
The cancellation of Jobs starring spot stirs health rumors, but the move could be mere politics

With the immense popularity of Apple and its bastion of fans that border on fanatical at times, there often comes an over scrutinizing of the company's moves. 

In particular, over the past year there has been much speculation as to the state of Apple CEO Steve Jobs’ health.  Jobs went through a very private battle with typically deadly pancreatic cancer several years ago and appeared to recover and be looking healthy the last couple years.  This year, however, some observers have opined that they think Jobs is looking sick and the disease may have reappeared and be worsening. 

In an ironic twist one newspaper even printed Jobs' obituary.  Apple has mostly refused to respond to these rumors, but when it has it has issued sharp denials that this is the case.

Given this background, when Mr. Jobs announced his decision to cancel his yearly keynote at the MacWorld trade show many jumped to the conclusion that the rumors were true and his illness was to blame.

Apple announced the development this week, revealing that Phil Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing, will take Jobs' place and deliver the keynote at Macworld Expo in San Francisco on January 6th, 2009.  In the past Mr. Jobs had always been on hand, typically to introduce new products; last year he had introduced the MacBook Air at the trade show's keynote address.

However, the real reason of Mr. Jobs exit appears to be more politics than health.

Trade shows' significance in the market has waned noticeably this year, partially due to the tough economy.  The word from Apple came just after Adobe announced it would not be attending MacWorld anymore.  With Belkin, Seagate, and Google also pulling out or downsizing their appearances, the fate of the show, according to some is at risk.

Along with the announcement that Mr. Jobs would not be there comes even more surprising news, which seems to verify that the cancellation was politics -- Apple will not exhibit at MacWorld next year.  Apple cites an improved direct relationship with its customer through its website as negating the need for the show, stating:

Apple is reaching more people in more ways than ever before, so like many companies, trade shows have become a very minor part of how Apple reaches its customers. The increasing popularity of Apple's Retail Stores, which more than 3.5 million people visit every week, and the Apple.com website enable Apple to directly reach more than a hundred million customers around the world in innovative new ways.

By exiting MacWorld an independent show, Apple stands to gain a tighter control on its public platform, with control something Apple always yearns for.

Despite these turn of events MacWorld's organizer IDG says MacWorld 2010 is still on -- with or without Apple. It states that it "Look(s) forward to many successful years of Macworld to come." 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By gochichi on 12/17/2008 3:10:58 PM , Rating: 2
I've never gone to MacWorld but I do keep track of it. There's a build up to it.

Apple has traditionally gotten away with selling outdated products because they only refresh once or twice a year (sometimes less, and seldom more). But then their releases are a big deal and getting a Mac is a decent deal for that first month.

It might have a lot to do with leaks, maybe they see it as easier to keep their product releases private if they don't have to do these conferences. Plus, if there is a leak, they can react to it and make an official announcement or whatever without clinging to a hard date.

I don't think it's health related, but if it is... that's really bad news for Apple. I can't think of any other company that depends on its CEO more. He's a control freak and the company is in no way ready to run without him. Even with Jobs it might fizzle (Microsoft is not kidding around in the horizon, touch, tighter code, voice recognition is already really good and getting better, 64-bit transition done) and who REALLY needs or wants an iPod that doesn't already have one?

Apple is on really thin ice by depending so much on one person. Especially since the world is setup to run perfectly fine without Apple, but Apple can't run without Jobs. Minus the Jobster and the world will move away from the monopoly.




"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki