Print 101 comment(s) - last by Fisherlee.. on Jan 2 at 9:42 AM

Satellite altimetry data showing rate of sea level rise  (Source: University of Colorado, Boulder)
World's oceans rise slower since 2005, fail to display predicted accelerating trend.

Satellite altimetry data indicates that the rate at which the world's oceans are rising has slowed significantly since 2005. Before the decrease, sea level had been rising by more than 3mm/year, which corresponds to an increase of about one foot per century. Since 2005, however, the rate has been closer to 2mm/year.

The decrease is significant as global climate models predict sea level rise to accelerate as atmospheric CO2 continues to increase. In the 1990s, when such acceleration appeared to be occurring, some scientists pointed to it as confirmation the models were operating correctly.

Sea level rise was calculated from altimetry data from the TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1 satellite missions, published by the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Dr. James Choe, a research associate with the University of Colorado, says the decrease is temporary. "Interannual variations often cause the rate to rise or fall", he says. Choe believes an accelerating trend will reappear within the next few years. Oceanographer Gary Mitchum of the University of South Florida, says making any judgement from the limited data available is "statistically so uncertain as to be meaningless".

Others disagree. Dr. Vincent Gray, a New Zealand based climatologist and expert reviewer for the IPCC, believes that the accelerated trends seen earlier were simply an artifact of poor measurements. "The satellite system has undoubtedly shown a rise since 1992, but it has leveled off", he tells DailyTech. "They had some bad calibration errors at the beginning."

Gray points to a study done by Flanders University using tide gauges which, he says, measured no perceptible increase in sea level over its entire 15 year period.

Sea level has been rising since the end of the last ice age, some 20,000 years ago. During an episode known as "Meltwater Pulse 1A", the world's oceans rose by more than 5 meters per century, a rate about 20 times faster than the current increase.

TOPEX/Poseidon was launched by NASA in 1992, and collected data until 2005. In 2001, NASA and France's Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES) launched its follow-up mission, Jason-1.

Jason-2 was launched in June of this year.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Bet were not gonna hear about this from Asher
By masher2 on 12/17/2008 9:58:50 AM , Rating: 2
> "bet we have a convenient week of absence from Asher.. "

Not hardly. That article from CNN is actually one of their most shockingly disingenuous. First of all, they failed to tell you the research only covered the period 2003-2005 -- meaning its already three years out of date with the data shown above.

Secondly, while the researchers concluded that ice loss in that period was higher than it was in the early 1990s, they also concluded the rate was smaller than most other estimates. Interesting CNN left out that tidbit, eh?

Thirdly, one should point out that GRACE only measures ice loss through a gravity proxy method, whose accuracy not only remains uncertain, but didn't even exist prior to 2003, which makes comparisons to any data from the 1990s (which came from different sources) somewhat arbitrary.

Read the actual research here, rather than CNN's interpretation of it:

RE: Bet were not gonna hear about this from Asher
By jbartabas on 12/18/2008 4:09:26 PM , Rating: 2
The linked "shockingly disingenuous" CNN article does not refer to the 2006 study you think they do. They refer to two very recent studies (presented this week at the AGU) using the most recent data, up to 2008.


RE: Bet were not gonna hear about this from Asher
By masher2 on 12/18/2008 4:32:18 PM , Rating: 2
I apologize for linking to the wrong study. This one is indeed more recent. However, it points up an even larger objection. From the synopsis:

In Antarctica, the Antarctic Peninsula and West Antarctica are losing mass and East Antarctica is gaining mass, by amounts similar to those of the 1990's.
Again, a curious omission for CNN. It's only the Arctic which is experiencing any acceleration (or was, a year ago at least), whereas the Southern hemisphere reaffirms the same pattern of loss in the east, and gain in the west.

By jbartabas on 12/18/2008 5:38:38 PM , Rating: 2
You should note that the CNN article reports also results from Luthcke et al., who used data as recent as 2008, contrary to Zwally et al. who stopped in 2007. IMO, they would have done better to leave Antarctica out of the story, as 2008 cannot create a trend on its own, and that's the impression left by the article. Or they should have differentiated between one particular recent result for West Antarctica, that still has to be confirmed as being a trend or not, and the situation in the NH polar regions where a trend appears more likely to occur.

"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki