Print 101 comment(s) - last by Fisherlee.. on Jan 2 at 9:42 AM

Satellite altimetry data showing rate of sea level rise  (Source: University of Colorado, Boulder)
World's oceans rise slower since 2005, fail to display predicted accelerating trend.

Satellite altimetry data indicates that the rate at which the world's oceans are rising has slowed significantly since 2005. Before the decrease, sea level had been rising by more than 3mm/year, which corresponds to an increase of about one foot per century. Since 2005, however, the rate has been closer to 2mm/year.

The decrease is significant as global climate models predict sea level rise to accelerate as atmospheric CO2 continues to increase. In the 1990s, when such acceleration appeared to be occurring, some scientists pointed to it as confirmation the models were operating correctly.

Sea level rise was calculated from altimetry data from the TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1 satellite missions, published by the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Dr. James Choe, a research associate with the University of Colorado, says the decrease is temporary. "Interannual variations often cause the rate to rise or fall", he says. Choe believes an accelerating trend will reappear within the next few years. Oceanographer Gary Mitchum of the University of South Florida, says making any judgement from the limited data available is "statistically so uncertain as to be meaningless".

Others disagree. Dr. Vincent Gray, a New Zealand based climatologist and expert reviewer for the IPCC, believes that the accelerated trends seen earlier were simply an artifact of poor measurements. "The satellite system has undoubtedly shown a rise since 1992, but it has leveled off", he tells DailyTech. "They had some bad calibration errors at the beginning."

Gray points to a study done by Flanders University using tide gauges which, he says, measured no perceptible increase in sea level over its entire 15 year period.

Sea level has been rising since the end of the last ice age, some 20,000 years ago. During an episode known as "Meltwater Pulse 1A", the world's oceans rose by more than 5 meters per century, a rate about 20 times faster than the current increase.

TOPEX/Poseidon was launched by NASA in 1992, and collected data until 2005. In 2001, NASA and France's Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES) launched its follow-up mission, Jason-1.

Jason-2 was launched in June of this year.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: So what?
By porkpie on 12/15/2008 12:42:52 PM , Rating: 3
Its been rising for thousands of years. If it isn't getting faster, then it certainly isn't because of Aunt Mabel's SUV.

And I love how a decade of data is just "statistical noise" to you alarmists, but one hot summer or a single hurricane means the end of the planet.

RE: So what?
By werepossum on 12/15/2008 1:35:01 PM , Rating: 2
by porkpie on December 15, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Its been rising for thousands of years. If it isn't getting faster, then it certainly isn't because of Aunt Mabel's SUV.

Obviously you don't understand NASA's highly advanced AlGorithms, by which conditions today can and do affect the distant past. These AlGorithms can also be applied to things like history - witness Rev. Wright's theory that the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor because we nuked them four years later.

RE: So what?
By foolsgambit11 on 12/15/2008 8:44:11 PM , Rating: 2
I don't pretend to be a climatologist. (Well, maybe sometimes, in the bedroom.... my girlfriend really loves it when I say things are getting hot all over....) But do either the AGW or the anti-AGW (or the anti-GW) camps have any explanation for the forcing behind this stabilization? Potential reasons I can come up with off the top of my head include:

Massive change in barometric pressure changes freezing point of water - definitely not supported by data

'Easy ice' has all melted, leaving 'harder ice', which melts slower? - not sure if that's even possible

Tectonic movement raising continents fast enough to counteract sea level rise (after all, it is moving at a snails pace) - not convinced the data supports a global average land height rise.

Increased precipitation over polar and sub-polar regions (due to increased average temperatures) leads to more evaporated water from oceans persisting on land (i.e. increased land ice) - not supported by Al Gore, but potentially possible if we look at non-isolated incidences, consider snow depth and not just extent, &c.

Colder temperatures - the data doesn't seem to support that for the entire decade - only since 2002 or so - although possibly only certain key regions were colder?)

Interesting questions to ask are, are we gaining ice cover extent, losing it, gaining ice thickness, losing it, and where? I know there have been 2 recent articles about snow cover being more persistent this year in Alaska and Skandinavia. I also know we need to be talking about land ice when discussing sea level rise.

In the end, it may be that, barring any convincing explanation of the mechanism for sea level stabilization, we'll have to accept that previous projections were based on inaccurate data. But it is surprising that the data so consistently showed a rise, considering the number of data points involved globally.

"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il

Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki