Print 101 comment(s) - last by Fisherlee.. on Jan 2 at 9:42 AM

Satellite altimetry data showing rate of sea level rise  (Source: University of Colorado, Boulder)
World's oceans rise slower since 2005, fail to display predicted accelerating trend.

Satellite altimetry data indicates that the rate at which the world's oceans are rising has slowed significantly since 2005. Before the decrease, sea level had been rising by more than 3mm/year, which corresponds to an increase of about one foot per century. Since 2005, however, the rate has been closer to 2mm/year.

The decrease is significant as global climate models predict sea level rise to accelerate as atmospheric CO2 continues to increase. In the 1990s, when such acceleration appeared to be occurring, some scientists pointed to it as confirmation the models were operating correctly.

Sea level rise was calculated from altimetry data from the TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1 satellite missions, published by the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Dr. James Choe, a research associate with the University of Colorado, says the decrease is temporary. "Interannual variations often cause the rate to rise or fall", he says. Choe believes an accelerating trend will reappear within the next few years. Oceanographer Gary Mitchum of the University of South Florida, says making any judgement from the limited data available is "statistically so uncertain as to be meaningless".

Others disagree. Dr. Vincent Gray, a New Zealand based climatologist and expert reviewer for the IPCC, believes that the accelerated trends seen earlier were simply an artifact of poor measurements. "The satellite system has undoubtedly shown a rise since 1992, but it has leveled off", he tells DailyTech. "They had some bad calibration errors at the beginning."

Gray points to a study done by Flanders University using tide gauges which, he says, measured no perceptible increase in sea level over its entire 15 year period.

Sea level has been rising since the end of the last ice age, some 20,000 years ago. During an episode known as "Meltwater Pulse 1A", the world's oceans rose by more than 5 meters per century, a rate about 20 times faster than the current increase.

TOPEX/Poseidon was launched by NASA in 1992, and collected data until 2005. In 2001, NASA and France's Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES) launched its follow-up mission, Jason-1.

Jason-2 was launched in June of this year.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Talk about statistically insignificant...
By Ryanman on 12/15/2008 9:34:49 AM , Rating: 5
Lol you're right.

How about we all just accept we're going to die in a nuclear fire instead?

RE: Talk about statistically insignificant...
By whirabomber on 12/15/2008 9:42:42 AM , Rating: 4
The power of global warming is insignificant compared to the power of media band wagnonning and political smoke screening.

The two theories on the current trend towards warming:
1) Man is doing it through pollution.
2) Global warming is a natural 10,000 year cycle of the earth.

The secret 3rd:

3) Global warming not only blows smoke over media coverage of banking, Iraq/Afghan war, and degradation of American power by greedy politicians but it sells Japanese hybrids quicker than your house devalued.

RE: Talk about statistically insignificant...
By Mitch101 on 12/15/2008 10:12:05 AM , Rating: 2
Next were going to find out that the Man-Bear-Pig exists.

Oh Crap!

RE: Talk about statistically insignificant...
By nstott on 12/16/2008 1:44:45 AM , Rating: 2
All hail man-bear-pig!

By phxfreddy on 12/16/2008 10:39:10 AM , Rating: 2
Don't you all know that the earth is cooling because it is warming?! ...or was that warming because its cooling.

Gee my effeminate liberal lieing arse gets confused upon cross examination.

RE: Talk about statistically insignificant...
By austinag on 12/15/2008 12:39:02 PM , Rating: 3
4) The Sun (where Earth gets 98% of it's heat from) is having a significant down trend in sunspot activity. I'm pretty sure DT even had an article on this a few months ago...

# 3 isn't true because the illuminati haven't approved it yet. Oops, I've said to much-

RE: Talk about statistically insignificant...
By whiskerwill on 12/17/2008 10:23:37 AM , Rating: 2
I'm pretty sure the sun is responsible for more like 99.9% of the earth's heat :)

By theendofallsongs on 12/17/2008 3:24:05 PM , Rating: 2
So where's the rest coming from?

By heulenwolf on 12/27/2008 12:13:42 AM , Rating: 2
There's lots of liquid-hot magma at the earth's core that I don't think it getting its heat from the sun;) Friction due to the motion of the core is responsible for most of the heat down there. Adding to both core heat and to heat at the surface is radioactive decay of natural levels of uranium, potassium, and thorium present all over. I'm not sure what percentage of "earth's heat" it is responsible for but I'm sure there are varying models.

"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki