backtop


Print 30 comment(s) - last by mpgenius.. on Dec 17 at 3:13 AM

Medfield will feature memory controller, graphics, and I/O on single die

A new roadmap has cropped up that shows the future of Intel's Atom processors that power the majority of netbook computers on the market today. The Atom has proven to be very successful for Intel and future versions will offer even more power and performance.

CNET News reports that the new roadmap shows a new Medfield Atom will debut in 2010. The processor will be built on the 32nm process, where as the current generation Atom parts are built on the 45nm process.

Before 2010 when Medfield pops up, Intel will be releasing Atom processors code named Pineview in 2009. DailyTech has covered the Pineview Atom processors before. The biggest difference between Pineview and today's Atom CPU will be the integration of a GPU core and memory controller onto the processor die.

In 2010, Medfield will integrate onto the die the processor, memory controller, multimedia functions, and I/O onto a single chip. A graphics core would be integrated as well. With this change, the netbook will gain the ability to handle HD video and move from a basic web surfing device into a full function entertainment device.

The information on the future Atom parts comes from a report created by UBS Securities. CNET News quotes the UBS Securities report saying, "[netbooks will evolve] from basic web page consumption to multimedia consumption including high-definition (HD) video."

Another bit of good news to look forward to is that battery life will increase for systems using the new Atom parts. Even with new features like touchscreen and WAN access the run time of netbooks will move from two to three hours up to near five hours according to the report.

Dual-core Atom parts are expected to be offered with the Medfield just as the current generation Atom parts feature dual-core variants.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By phazers on 12/8/2008 11:47:51 AM , Rating: 2
I think AMD really missed out by cancelling Bobcat, especially since it looks like netbooks is the most rapidly growing sector in a shrinking market.




RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By Amiga500 on 12/8/2008 12:19:43 PM , Rating: 2
I disagree - they cannot afford to invest large sums of engineering resources in market areas that have questionable returns.

Intel now regrets making the Atom as it has bombed out a lot of their higher end chip's prices.


RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By Lord 666 on 12/8/08, Rating: 0
RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By MadMan007 on 12/8/2008 1:56:22 PM , Rating: 2
It's good to be informed yourself before jumping on other people: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10108025-64.html


RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By Lord 666 on 12/8/2008 9:29:52 PM , Rating: 1
Listen, if a company truly "regretted" releasing a product, they would submarine it... not develop successors as this post is about.

Intel is committed to supporting the N270 for 7+ years.

Intel regrets supporting RDRAM, not creating the Atom.


RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By Bruneauinfo on 12/8/2008 11:09:32 PM , Rating: 2
you didn't read the article he posted.


By SilthDraeth on 12/9/2008 10:25:16 AM , Rating: 2
There is a Raon Everun Note that uses a AMD 690 chipset, and a Turion x2. It is smaller than the EEE.


RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By UNCjigga on 12/8/2008 12:57:08 PM , Rating: 2
AMD may have missed out, but it looks like Nvidia might be getting into the game, and I'm curious to see if they manage to get a low power, all-in-one CPU+GPU+I/O chip before Intel does. I'd rather have integrated graphics from Nvidia than Intel.


RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By King of Heroes on 12/8/2008 1:10:15 PM , Rating: 2
I know Nvidia announced they were collaborating with VIA for a netbook platform, but now it seems that was only a bargaining chip for some deal with Intel? If thats the case, I would avoid Nvidia on sheer principle (the principle being that asshats shouldn't benefit from dirty tactics like that).

If that dream is still alive, a VIA Nano + Geforce 9400 integrated graphics would be blow anything else out of the water right now.


By psychobriggsy on 12/8/2008 1:40:59 PM , Rating: 2
NVIDIA are going with Tegra - ARM11 + Graphics + Everything on a single chip. TI, Samsung, Apple, etc, are all doing similar things, with the far faster Cortex A8/A9 ARM core(s).


By sprockkets on 12/8/2008 4:16:09 PM , Rating: 2
Supposively it was just to have a chipset plus a nano processor. It would not be too big of a deal to make one.

There appears to be only one nano board for sale right now, and it is expensive. No one seems to want to match a mini itx board from Intel right now.

Shame. Intel has so many resources to beat AMD at every level, and now VIA. They will have their integrated system on a chip first even though they probably started on it later.


"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki