backtop


Print 81 comment(s) - last by Min Jia.. on Nov 26 at 9:44 PM

The number of attacks and severity of attacks by Chinese hackers continues to increase

A congressional advisory panel has said China is perfecting its ability to engage in cyber warfare and other computer espionage against the United States and its allies.

Congress also warned that China is working on better engaging in cyber warfare that could lead to the delay and disruption of U.S. military deployment anywhere in the world.  Specifically, the Chinese are using cyber warfare to gain access to classified military documents, along with viewing documents from American corporations that work with the government.

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission was founded eight years ago in an effort to help learn about and give advice regarding U.S.-China relations.  The overall threat of cyber attacks grows year after year, with 5 million computers in the United States last year the target of 43,880 incidents of attacks and other suspicious activity.  

The top 10 largest U.S. defense contractor companies all suffered computer espionage from foreign-based attackers, including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon.

Chinese ability to attack is "so sophisticated that the US may be unable to counteract or even detect the efforts" of the attacks, according to the report.

The six Democrats and six Republicans who make up the panel said China's wide scale military modernization and "impressive but disturbing" computer and space warfare abilities "suggest China is intent on expanding its sphere of control even at the expense of its Asian neighbors and the United States."

There was no official word back from Chinese officials about the report.

President-elect Obama and his new staff will have to deal with cyber warfare and similar issues related to China once he takes office in January.  

Obama will face pressure from lawmakers who seek to acquire additional funding for programs aimed at monitoring Chinese cyber attacks and help protect government and defense computers.

Another situation Obama has to consider is with the Chinese space program, which is "steadily increasing the vulnerability of US assets," with a better ability to locate US warships deployed in the Pacific Ocean.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Give it up
By MPE on 11/24/2008 10:27:40 AM , Rating: 2
Socialst?

Which part of the republican plan is not socialist? The $700 Billion bailout? The proposed mortgage bailout of BAD mortgage? Republican Theodore Roosevelt progressive income tax we currently use?
When McCain in 2000 running for president said its fair to tax the wealthy? Or Alaska's taxing of oil corporation and 'spreading the wealth' to every citizen of Alaska for just living in Alaska. That is right - Alaska gives you $3000+ check every year, straight from corporate tax, just for living there.
That must not be socialist?

Socialism was a catch phrase by the extreme right to label Obama something during the campaign. It has no credibility whatsoever.


RE: Give it up
By grenableu on 11/24/2008 10:35:18 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Which part of the republican plan is not socialist? The $700 Billion bailout?
Get your facts straight. The bailout plan was proposed and passed by the Democratic leadership of the House and Senate. The first version of it was shot down by Republicans, and Republicans still managed to block the second version.

MOST (not all) Republicans were AGAINST the bailout. ALMOST ALL Democratics were FOR it.

quote:
That is right - Alaska gives you $3000+ check every year, straight from corporate tax, just for living there.
Ah, so it's Palin's fault for a policy that was put in place before she was even born? Good logic there.


RE: Give it up
By MPE on 11/24/2008 11:00:59 AM , Rating: 3
[quote]Get your facts straight. The bailout plan was proposed and passed by the Democratic leadership of the House and Senate. The first version of it was shot down by Republicans, and Republicans still managed to block the second version.[/quote]

Which was originally created and introduced by president Bush, which needed 91 Republican House Rep voted for (172 Dems) and 30 Rep Senators (40 Dems) voted for.
of course they are not socialist. And nice try on dodging the other facts.

[quote]Ah, so it's Palin's fault for a policy that was put in place before she was even born? Good logic there. [/quote]

Which she is a BIG supporter of. In fact she introduced and got it to pass new law. Revising the tax code, thus increasing the rebate.
So she obviously think its not fair. She made it more fair by spreading more wealth.


RE: Give it up
By grenableu on 11/24/08, Rating: 0
RE: Give it up
By MPE on 11/24/2008 11:36:02 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
What Bush proposed was a 3-page bill. What got passed by the Democratic congress was over 400 pages, with a much higher price tag too.

So you are going to ignore Bush wanted a bailout plan and some Republican House and Senate voted for it? That is like arguing you only went 70 MPH in a 55 MPH while everyone else was doing 80 MPH.

quote:
She phased out a few loopholes that prevented oil producers from having to pay royalties for oil drilled on public land. That's common sense, not "spreading the wealth".

Nice try. Under Palin ACES revision of late 2007, the tax went up by an additional 1.5% on oil revenues and the rebate went up.

the point is - she made no attempts to revise to lower the tax - let alone remove what is obviously a wealth distribution tax code.

BTW - I love when Palin does the wealth spreading it is 'common sense'. When everyone else does it, it is 'socialist'.


RE: Give it up
By grenableu on 11/24/2008 12:46:22 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
So you are going to ignore Bush wanted a bailout plan
So are you going to ignore the fact that most Republicans were against the plan, and most Democrats for it? And ignore the fact that the bailout Bush wanted was 1/100 the size of what the Democrats delivered?


RE: Give it up
By omnicronx on 11/24/2008 1:00:38 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
And ignore the fact that the bailout Bush wanted was 1/100 the size of what the Democrats delivered?
Really?
quote:
"U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson proposed a plan under which the U.S. Treasury would acquire up to $700 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities.[22] The plan was immediately backed by President George W. Bush and negotiations began with leaders in the U.S. Congress to draft appropriate legislation."
quote:
On September 23, the plan was presented by Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke to the Senate Banking Committee who rejected it as unacceptable.[31]
(This was rejected by a sizable amount too, and the senate was basically divided 50/50, so many democrats must have voted against it)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Economic_St...


RE: Give it up
By omnicronx on 11/24/2008 12:46:58 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
So you are going to ignore Bush wanted a bailout plan and some Republican House and Senate voted for it? That is like arguing you only went 70 MPH in a 55 MPH while everyone else was doing 80 MPH.
I find it funny he even mentions this, does this mean that every bill proposed by Bush/Clinton can be accredited to the other party?(Repub dominated house during Clinton reign, and vice-versa during the Democrat house reign?) Bush proposed the Bill, and McCain almost didn't show up to the debate so that he could 'speed things up', but of course its the democrats who are to blame..

Both parties had their proponents and their opponents, it was not merely one party that decided the bills fate, so don't try to make it out as though it was a single party's 'fault'.


RE: Give it up
By MPE on 11/24/2008 2:25:40 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Both parties had their proponents and their opponents, it was not merely one party that decided the bills fate, so don't try to make it out as though it was a single party's 'fault'.

That is exactly my point!!!!
Socialist tagging for Obama's policy has no credibility since Repubs senaors, presidents, governors are as bad of an offender as their Democrat counterparts. Look at my post - I even give you how many Dems voted for it. I was not trying to hide.


RE: Give it up
By omnicronx on 11/24/2008 2:40:53 PM , Rating: 2
I was agreeing with you :) My statements were aimed at the poster you were replying too.


RE: Give it up
By masher2 (blog) on 11/24/2008 12:47:47 PM , Rating: 2
> "Under Palin ACES revision of late 2007, the tax went up by an additional 1.5% on oil revenues"

Oops! Under ACES, the tax actually rose by 2.5% (22.5% - 25%) -- but only on North Slope oil...oil on land owned by the Alaskan citizens themselves.


RE: Give it up
By blueman12 on 11/24/2008 5:02:55 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, Democrat Woodrow Wilson implemented the federal income tax via the 16th amendment.

The 700 billion dollar bailout plan was actually proposed by treasury secretary Paulson, not any one party.

Please get your facts straight.


RE: Give it up
By MPE on 11/24/2008 5:44:28 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Actually, Democrat Woodrow Wilson implemented the federal income tax via the 16th amendment.


I was referring to progressive income tax not the flat tax.

quote:
The 700 billion dollar bailout plan was actually proposed by treasury secretary Paulson, not any one party.


Uhm... Treasury Secretary is a appointed position in the Executive Branch. That is not the same a Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Meaning, any policy from Treasury Secretary office IS the policy of the president.

So it seems you do not know your facts.


RE: Give it up
By zombiexl on 11/24/2008 6:20:12 PM , Rating: 2
I never said that most republicans were any better. All politicians are full of....

How can you say he’s not a socialist? His comments almost mirrored karl marx exactly.

By the way, let me preemptively tell you that I don’t follow fox news. I know when you people who think everything should be given to you don’t agree with a point you mention fox news.


"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki