backtop


Print 87 comment(s) - last by Jack Ripoff.. on Nov 27 at 4:19 PM


Computer protection starts at home.  (Source: Gamespot.com)
Microsoft looks to take the fight to malware makers with its own free product

Microsoft has long annoyed security software makers over the last decade as it has rolled out free products which often offer a competitive alternative to competitor's packaged software free-of-charge.  Microsoft merely offered a decently competitive product for a much cheaper price -- free.

With its firewall and antispyware (Windows Defender) built into Vista, business for private firewall software already has taken a hit.  Now in a move that is sure to make Trend Micro, McAffee, Norton, and other security software makers lose sleep; Microsoft has announced that in 2009, it will offer free antivirus software.

To understand this new announcement, a quick trip down memory lane is in order. 

Microsoft first entered the antivirus software business in 1992 with its Microsoft Anti-Virus product, which it contracted to Central Point Inc. (later acquired by Symantec).  The software was designed for Microsoft DOS 6.0 through 6.22 and could detect an impressive 1,234 viruses.  Unfortunately, there were no updates available, though a 1996 pack brought the total up to 2,371 viruses.  Embarrassingly, the software though the Windows 95 installer file was a virus.

After the mixed reviews of Microsoft A-V, Microsoft left the business until 2005 when it released betas of Windows Live OneCare.  The suite combined antivirus software with a tune-up utility, a stronger firewall, and a file backup utility.  The bundle was made commercially available May 31, 2006.  Subsequent Live OneCare 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 have also hit the market since, with the 2.5 iteration debuting in July 3 of this year.

Arriving in the present, Microsoft has announced it is axing the subscription based antivirus software business and will offer its antivirus tools for free.  The new suite is codenamed "Morro" and will available in the second half of 2009.  Microsoft describes the software as a "streamlined solution" and states, "[Morro] will provide comprehensive protection from malware including viruses, spyware, rootkits and trojans. This new solution, to be offered at no charge to consumers, will be architected for a smaller footprint that will use fewer computing resources, making it ideal for low-bandwidth scenarios or less powerful PCs."

The latter portion appears to be a clear nod to Windows efforts to push for a leaner footprint from top-to-bottom, a major focus of Windows 7 (which has been subject to recent doubts).

Microsoft will discontinue the OneCare subscription service June 30, 2009, but customers should fret not -- they will soon receive virtually the same solution entirely for free.

Amy Barzdukas, senior director of product management for the Online Services and Windows Division at Microsoft states, "Customers around the world have told us that they need comprehensive, ongoing protection from new and existing threats, and we take that concern seriously.  This new, no-cost offering will give us the ability to protect an even greater number of consumers, especially in markets where the growth of new PC purchases is outpaced only by the growth of malware."

Microsoft has acknowledged that the suite may not contain some of the extra non-security utilities such as tune up and printer sharing available in some commercial antivirus solutions.  However, when it comes to its core AV product it brags that its malware engine has garnered many awards already, including the VB100 award from Virus Bulletin, Checkmark Certification from West Coast Labs and certification from the International Computer Security Association Labs.  Microsoft has made great strides in security, besting a Mac machine and tying a Linux box at a recent hacker conference.

The new software will be available for Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7.  Microsoft plans to integrate it with the upcoming Internet Explorer 8 browser which features many security enhancements including the much talked about "Porn Mode".



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Thank god
By drebo on 11/19/2008 10:29:04 AM , Rating: -1
Anyone who thinks that Norton is still as bad as it was just after Symantec bought it has been living in a whole. Norton Antivirus 2008/2009 (NOT Norton Internet Security or Norton 360) is a very good and reliable product.

On top of that, businesses do not use free antivirus products. Period. Whether they're from Microsoft or AVG, they just don't do it. They need an enterprise class product that is centrally managed and provides them with a certain level of monitoring. Symantec's Endpoint Protection is a very, very good product in the business sector. (*cough*didimentionthesoftwareisessentiallyfreeandy oujustpayfortheabilitytocallsupport?*cough*)

It would be a horrible, terrible thing if Symantec went out of business.


RE: Thank god
By blowfish on 11/19/2008 10:31:24 AM , Rating: 3
Hmm, you work for Symantec or something?


RE: Thank god
By drebo on 11/19/2008 10:45:53 AM , Rating: 2
Nope. I just show credit where credit is due when a product makes my own job 100% easier.


RE: Thank god
By nosfe on 11/19/2008 11:13:24 AM , Rating: 3
last i checked norton was a good av until symantec happened, then it just got bloated and more bloated with every version; also, they buy PowerQuest and then kill of Partition Magic, how brilliant! so Symantec should have kicked the bucket years ago, not now


RE: Thank god
By omnicronx on 11/19/2008 11:32:25 AM , Rating: 3
Until Symantec happened? Symantec has owned Norton since 1990, what on earth are you talking about. Anyone who thinks that Symantec is going anywhere is an idiot, they are in the top 10 in the worlds largest software companies (currently 6th) and their business does not rely totally on Antivirus products.


RE: Thank god
By nosfe on 11/19/2008 11:58:42 AM , Rating: 2
first point, yes it seems that i remember wrongly about symantec and norton, i remembered about something happening in around 2001 as that was when nav started getting bloated

I'm not saying that Symantec is going anywhere. I'm not saying that EA is going anywhere. I'm just saying that i want them gone. I don't care how big they are, they are crappy companies that did more damage then good

if NAV is so great as you say then why does it need a special program just to make sure that it uninstalls correctly?(Norton Removal Tool)


RE: Thank god
By omnicronx on 11/19/2008 12:55:15 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
if NAV is so great as you say then why does it need a special program just to make sure that it uninstalls correctly?(Norton Removal Tool)
I never said NAV is 'so great', but your question has a pretty obvious answer. Its so that the end user, especially in a workplace environment cannot merely uninstall the app. Same thing goes for any virus or intruder that tries to uninstall the app to get further access to the filesystem without interruption. And for the record, the new versions of norton especially the corp editions can be uninstalled. Sometimes there is a password, but the default is 'symantec'. Its more of a deterrent than anything.


RE: Thank god
By nosfe on 11/19/2008 1:08:13 PM , Rating: 3
i'm not talking about those kind of uninstall "problems", i'm talking about all the crap that gets installed with nav that doesn't go away when you uninstall nav. thats why symantec got hammered and why they subsequently made that uninstall tool. If you ask me, the only programs that need special programs just to be able to uninstall them are viruses and other malware in general, definitely not something i'm willing to put on my computer


RE: Thank god
By elessar1 on 11/19/2008 12:50:33 PM , Rating: 3
<cough>
Working on a 2000+ people enterprise with Symantec on every PC and there hasnt been an infection in more than a year...
</cough>

Anyway... i use AVG8 on mi own PCs...

cheers


RE: Thank god
By tech329 on 11/19/2008 11:30:10 AM , Rating: 2
Norton (Symantec) has really cleaned up their act in the last couple of years. The 2006 product was horrible. 2007 was better as was 2008 and now 2009. I too also only use the Antivirus product. I don't think more than that is required. Making an AV product isn't easy. Focusing on bells and whistles rather than core features was a mistake for those vendors (all of them) who tried the Swiss Army Knife approach. One other piece of advice is to buy the new version each year from a discounter or on sale. Not over the Interent as a download. Ever!!! For this category of software it is far better to have a real CD and a license key. Less hassle and for non-tech persons, way easier.


RE: Thank god
By xphile on 11/23/2008 8:19:24 PM , Rating: 2
Jolly good luck to you if you think in this day and age you dont need a capable firewall.

Your purchase advice is disasterous too - it cant be *better* to buy a cd - since 10 minutes after it's pressed Symantec will have updates you need to download anyway, either to the virus definitions or the program or both. And in reality when you install the programme at its earliest it is probably 4 to 6 weeks old up to 10 or 11 months old, and you could have to download about as much as you installed in the first place.

With an account you cant "lose" the software - if anything goes wrong you just download it again, and that version is always current.

I do agree it can be cheaper to find a cd package in some cases if you know where to look - but the whole thrust of your argument was that it was easier for the non-tech person - and trust me;

A) Non tech persons just bowl into a store and pay full retail 100% of the time - they do not know where to get discounts.

and

B) If you've ever seen the results of the majority of non-tech peoples attempts to install virus software from cds you'd know they somehow manage to get that wrong more often than not - the "click here, now bugger off", internet based installs are rapidly becoming the most user friendly.


RE: Thank god
By Krotchrot on 11/19/2008 1:02:47 PM , Rating: 2
Living in a whole what?


RE: Thank god
By kalak on 11/19/2008 2:03:07 PM , Rating: 2
he means "hole", not "whole"...
:-)


RE: Thank god
By HighWing on 11/19/2008 1:09:02 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
They need an enterprise class product that is centrally managed and provides them with a certain level of monitoring.


Ok maybe you missed the part where it said this will be offered by Microsoft themselves. I would be willing to stake a good deal of money on the fact that there will most likely be an update to Windows Server that will add such functionality. At the very least I'm sure there will be a whole slew of policy sets that will allow admins configure every aspect of how it runs.


RE: Thank god
By Nekrik on 11/19/2008 3:07:43 PM , Rating: 2
their corporate versions were never as bad as their commercial ones, but they burned too many bridges and I still would vote them off the island and into oblivion first, followed closely by McAfee. Their engineering practices, they're invasive installs, damage to computers in the past, crapy uninstallers that fail miserably, inability to learn how to make AV software that doesn't include dirty little kernel hacks...screw them completely.


"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki