Print 191 comment(s) - last by lucasb.. on Nov 30 at 1:58 PM

30 years of sea ice data. The red line indicates deviation from the seasonally-adjusted mean.  (Source: Arctic Research Center, University of Illinois)
Rapid Rebound Brings Ice Back to Levels from the 1980s.

An abnormally cool Arctic is seeing dramatic changes to ice levels.  In sharp contrast to the rapid melting seen last year, the amount of global sea ice has rebounded sharply and is now growing rapidly. The total amount of ice, which set a record low value last year, grew in October at the fastest pace since record-keeping began in 1979.

The actual amount of ice area varies seasonally from about 16 to 23 million square kilometers. However, the mean anomaly-- defined as the difference between the current area and the seasonally-adjusted average-- changes much slower, and generally varies by only 2-3 million square kilometers.

That anomaly had been negative, indicating ice loss, for most of the current decade and reached a historic low in 2007. The current value is again zero, indicating an amount of ice exactly equal to the global average from 1979-2000.

Bill Chapman, a researcher with the Arctic Climate Center at the University of Illinois, says the rapid increase is "no big deal". He says that, while the Arctic has certainly been colder in recent months, the long-term decrease is still ongoing. Chapman, who predicts that sea ice will soon stop growing, sees nothing in the recent data to contradict predictions of global warming.

Others aren't quite so sure. Dr. Patrick Michaels, Professor of Environmental Science at the University of Virginia, says he sees some "very odd" things occurring in recent years. Michaels, who is also a Senior Fellow with the Cato Institute, tells DailyTech that, while the behavior of the Arctic seems to agree with climate models predictions, the Southern Hemisphere can't be explained by current theory. "The models predict a warming ocean around Antarctica, so why would we see more sea ice?" Michaels adds that large areas of the Southern Pacific are showing cooling trends, an occurrence not anticipated by any current climate model.

On average, ice covers roughly 7% of the ocean surface of the planet. Sea ice is floating and therefore doesn't affect sea level like the ice anchored on bedrock in Antarctica or Greenland. However, research has indicated that the Antarctic continent -- which is on a long-term cooling trend -- has also been gaining ice in recent years.

The primary instrument for measuring sea ice today is the AMSR-E microwave radiometer, an instrument package aboard NASA's AQUA satellite. AQUA was launched in 2002, as part of NASA's Earth Observing System (EOS).

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Quality research or...?
By McDragon on 11/8/2008 7:44:40 AM , Rating: 2
The problem is you can always find someone that will claim whatever you want.

If you read NOAA's reports, they contradict this one completely.
I would rather have seen a link to an article in a peer-reviewed magazine, than a DT interview.
I can't say I have first hand experience with the antarctic, but living in Denmark, I regularily meet people from Greenland...They sure tell a different tale than what you would think from reading articles like this on DT.

RE: Quality research or...?
By mmatis on 11/9/2008 8:57:44 AM , Rating: 2
If you regularly meet people from Greenland, then you damn well ought to know that, as the glaciers melt, they're revealing farmsteads from before the Maunder Minimum. That means there were farms there actually growing stuff, instead of freezing their asses off. And guess what? The Maunder Minimum was also a time of low sunspot activity. But that's just too much of a coinkydink for you, eh? You'd rather pay attention to the maggot leeches like Hansen as he spews his nonsense. All Hail the One True Mick!

RE: Quality research or...?
By monoape on 11/9/2008 3:11:18 PM , Rating: 2
Looks like you swallowed one of the denier whoppers:

RE: Quality research or...?
By McDragon on 11/9/2008 5:14:30 PM , Rating: 1
Might I suggest a few deep breaths?

..And then say that by your logic, we should have seen ice growth in 2008 as we are presently at the low point in the 11-year sunspot cycle...?
I'm not saying that the generally higher sunspot levels of modern times are not related to the arctic melting, its possible for all I know.

All I'm saying is: There is arctic melting. Quite a lot, in fact.

The original poster denied this.

RE: Quality research or...?
By grenableu on 11/9/2008 5:30:04 PM , Rating: 1
by your logic, we should have seen ice growth in 2008
We did. 2007 was the lowest year on record. 2008 has come back from that all the way to normal. That's a lot of ice growth for only one year.

RE: Quality research or...?
By monoape on 11/10/2008 4:30:23 PM , Rating: 1
> 2008 has come back from that all the way to normal.

Regardless of what you mean by "normal", that's scientifically illiterate bullshit.

"Consistent with the diminishing trends in the extent and thickness of the cover is a significant loss of the older, thicker perennial ice in the Arctic." -

RE: Quality research or...?
By foolsgambit11 on 11/10/2008 6:54:39 PM , Rating: 3
Critical reading skills, please. This is about total sea ice amounts. The 2007 low was Arctic sea ice. Then there's Antarctic sea ice. Currently, the total (i.e., Arctic + Antarctic) is equal to the average. That says nothing about the health of one or the other by itself. However, when you add in the fact (stated in the article) that Antarctic ice has been on the increase in historical terms, it becomes clear than Arctic sea ice is still below the mean.

Indeed, from the graph, it looks like total sea ice hit its record low during the Antarctic melt of 2006 (Jan-Feb time frame). Not only that, but global sea ice levels were above average only 6 months ago or so. And before that, they were above average around September of 2006. Between those times, the anomaly numbers went to a record low (and this year approached that record low anomaly). Despite the fact that levels have 'normalized' several times in the past few years, there is still an obvious downward trend in the past 4 years. But as a voice of moderation, that's only 4 years, and is too small a window to draw long-term conclusions from alone.

"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki