backtop


Print 110 comment(s) - last by kalak.. on Nov 10 at 2:51 PM


Microsoft's Windows 7 was looking good running on an ASUS laptop (with bamboo paneling) at WinHEC. The OS is set to ship in mid 2009, much earlier than expected.  (Source: Ina Fried/CNET News)
Windows 7 is set to drop mid-year 2009, says Microsoft

At Microsoft's Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC), an important yearly event for the tech giant, new hardware details on the upcoming Windows 7 weren't the only revelation that Microsoft had in store.  Perhaps the most significant development of the conference came as a minor clarification -- Microsoft set a solid timeframe for when it plans to release Windows 7, barring unforeseen problems.

Originally, speculation was that Microsoft might field a Windows Vista successor in 2011 or 2012 as there was over 5 years between the release of Windows XP and Windows Vista.  However, with less than glowing reception of Vista, largely due to poor hardware partner support and a large footprint, Microsoft stepped up its efforts to launch its new Windows OS, which would set right the places where Vista went wrong.

Early this year, 2010 was what some Microsoft executives were saying to expect for a release date.  However, as the year progressed, Microsoft's top executives became increasingly optimistic that the OS could be delivered in late 2009.  Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer first floated the possibility of a 2009 release earlier this year.

Microsoft director Doug Howe showed slides in a WinHEC presentation that all but confirmed a 2009 release -- and even earlier than expected.  His slides stated that Microsoft will be releasing Windows 7 mid-year, in time to be included on the machines to be sold during the holiday buying season.  Mr. Howe stated, "Definitely the holiday focus is going to be on 7."

Also revealed by Mr. Howe were more details on Microsoft's secretive Velocity program aimed at improving Windows Vista PC quality.  The program, according to Microsoft, will run through next spring, conveniently terminating at about the time that Windows 7 will be preparing to ship.

The new program was initially only open to select computer manufacturers, but will now be opened to select software and hardware partners as well.  The basic premise is that the partners will have to engineer their products to work optimally with Vista and will have to undergo rigorous certification testing.  Partners will benefit from the good publicity, and Mr. Howe revealed in a slide that Microsoft might do some advertising for their products first-hand.

No list of the criteria was given, but one of the criteria, confirmed by Mr. Howe, was the ability to boot Windows Vista and have it ready to run within 50 seconds.  Many of the Velocity-certified machines boot significantly faster than this, according to Mr. Howe, but Microsoft wanted to set a widely obtainable goal.

After the debacle of Microsoft's "Vista Capable" program, which saw the company's stickers placed on underpowered bargain machines clearly not Vista ready, Velocity is both an effort on Microsoft's part to show that it's turned over a new leave and an effort to overall improve Vista machine quality.  The program launched in July 2007.

The program targeted the sluggish system performance that was plaguing many Windows Vista machines.  Originally intended as a three month program, it was extended far past the planned termination, due to Microsoft realizing there was still much work to be done.  In particular the program aims to speed up the time it takes for Vista computers to start up, shut down, sleep, and wake up.  Other goals include that all the hardware and software is completely compatible with Vista, as compatibility is a perennial trouble-spot or Vista.

Microsoft's labs in Redmond, Wash. are in charge of the Velocity testing.

Overall, Windows observers should be able to appreciate that Microsoft sincerely seems to be trying to improve the OS.  However, what it can't improve like memory and processing footprint, should be remedied with the release of Windows 7, which has now been all but confirmed for mid next year.   

One last interesting note -- Microsoft previously stated that it would release Vista's Service Pack 2 before Windows 7 -- so that means that if it sticks with this plan, Vista SP2 is likely coming in Spring of 2009.  Stay tuned for more details on that one.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Footprint?
By quiksilvr on 11/7/2008 11:16:49 AM , Rating: 2
Though this logic makes sense for today's notebooks and desktops it isn't the case for earlier ones. If you have a notebook with 1 GB RAM, you are either forced to get Vista Basic, stick with XP, or upgrade your RAM. Now for techies like us that's no problem but for the average consumer it isn't the case.

You also have to keep in mind netbooks and other ultraportables. Having the RAM and space needed jacks up the price very painfully. As a result, XP is kept and Vista sales decrease. This is where the space issue becomes a problem.

On top of that, despite the new service pack and upgrades, Vista still takes more battery life. So in a logical standpoint, the only real benefit for Vista is DirectX 10 gaming. The skin and aero interface with its transparent bars and whatnot can all be replicated on XP with 3rd party programs. So the reasons to get Vista decrease more and more.

So I agree, if you have a modern desktop and notebook, Vista shouldn't be much of a problem, but what's the point? If you can get XP for cheap you might as well get it and cut down the resources your computer eats up and wait for Windows 7.


RE: Footprint?
By Spivonious on 11/7/2008 11:45:51 AM , Rating: 2
Vista is incredibly different from XP under the hood. DirectX 10 gaming support and Aero are just icing on the cake.

What's more, Windows 7 is built from Vista. The hardware requirements are not changing.


RE: Footprint?
By kensiko on 11/7/2008 12:11:48 PM , Rating: 2
There you are false.

I can assure you, the new OS is way more lighter when run in slower computers !

And for the news, I'm not surprised, the Win7 Bêta 6801 is already fully stable ! It runs fast, very fast, I love it !


RE: Footprint?
By Spivonious on 11/7/2008 1:02:59 PM , Rating: 3
I'm just inferring the hardware requirements from the statements MS has made saying that if it works on Vista it will work on Windows 7.

I'm sure performance has been tweaked in Win7.


RE: Footprint?
By TomZ on 11/7/2008 1:34:51 PM , Rating: 2
I think that Microsoft is doing performance optimizations in Windows 7 in order to effectively support the netbook/ultra-mobile/low-cost markets - devices that have processors like Atom and only 1 or 2GB of RAM maximum.

It is important that Windows 7 runs there so that they do not have to continue to sell and support XP into that market.


RE: Footprint?
By epobirs on 11/8/2008 4:08:11 PM , Rating: 2
This is specifically due to a technique coordinating the display buffers with the memory in the video subsystem. They demonstrated this during the WinHEC keynote.

This trick is pretty much just to enable Windows 7 in the netbook market. As explained in one of the technical sessions, it reverts back to the normal way of doing things if anything is done to complicate the system, most particularly having more than one GPU and/or monitor.

This won't even matter for the netbooks for long. The way memory prices and density are going I wouldn't bother with less than 4 GB in a new system and would have at least 8 GB in any machine for a power user. (The first i7 desktop board I've seen supports up to 16 GB, albeit with reduced performance for the 4th DIMM.) A $300 netbook is going to have 2 GB minimum pretty soon.

There is plenty of tweaking that can be done to make Vista less processor intensive and most of that will likely still apply under Win7. There are a bunch of system services a netbook user isn't likely to invoke.


RE: Footprint?
By kalak on 11/10/2008 2:51:55 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
On top of that, despite the new service pack and upgrades, Vista still takes more battery life. So in a logical standpoint, the only real benefit for Vista is DirectX 10 gaming. The skin and aero interface with its transparent bars and whatnot can all be replicated on XP with 3rd party programs. So the reasons to get Vista decrease more and more. So I agree, if you have a modern desktop and notebook, Vista shouldn't be much of a problem, but what's the point? If you can get XP for cheap you might as well get it and cut down the resources your computer eats up and wait for Windows 7.


Couldn't agree more....


"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki