backtop


Print 95 comment(s) - last by The0ne.. on Nov 7 at 10:52 AM


2010 Ford Fusion  (Source: Ford)
Ford unveils "renewed" Fusion complete with new powertrain options

Ford's Fusion has been a moderate success for the company in the mid-size sedan category. While the Fusion doesn't have the sales numbers to put it toe-to-toe with the Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, and Nissan Altima, the vehicle is nonetheless a competent entry in one of the most fiercely contested auto segments in North America.

Now that the Fusion has been on the market for a few years, Ford is ready to give the vehicle a makeover. Stylistically, the vehicle received new front and rear fascias, although the only press shot provided by Ford is of the vehicle's dramatic new front.

The new front end styling seems to merge the current three-bar grill prominent with Ford's current North American styling theme with the more organic shapes found on the European market Mondeo, Ka, and Fiesta (as evidenced by the fog lamp shapes and lower air dam). The hood also features a prominent "power bulge" to accentuate the changes under hood.

When it comes to the powertrain, Ford is introducing a new 175 HP 2.5-liter inline-4 engine -- also available in the all-new Mazda6 and upcoming second generation Mazda3 -- which replaces the old 2.3 liter engine. Ford also massaged the 3.0-liter V6 to produce 240 HP (up 19HP from before). The engine is also capable of running on E85.

For those that crave even more power, the corporate 3.5-liter V6 engine is also available with 263 HP on tap. The 3.5-liter V6 is also used in the Ford Edge and Ford Flex crossovers.

All three of the above engines will be paired with a six-speed automatic transmission.

The most interesting news about the new Fusion, however, is that a new hybrid version of the vehicle is in the works. The new Fusion Hybrid will use the 2.5-liter inline-4 and a heavily revamped version of the hybrid system used in the current Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner. Ford managed to reduce the number of cells used in the battery pack by 20 percent while at the same time boosted the power output by each individual cell by 20 percent.

The new NiMH battery pack is now 30 percent smaller than the one featured in the Escape/Mariner Hybrids and weighs 23 percent less. The reduced dimensions and weight also means that the battery pack no longer requires its own A/C unit to stay cool which also saves weight.

Ford boosted the power generated by the electric motor from 70 kW to 93 kW, while generator output rose from 45 kW to 70 kW. As a result, the new Fusion Hybrid can now reach speed of up to 47 MPH on battery power alone -- this is up from 24 MPH on the Escape/Mariner Hybrids.

Best of all, the significant improvements to the hybrid powertrain will translate into big mileage gains for drivers. Ford says that the Fusion Hybrid will achieve 5 MPG better EPA ratings in the city than the Toyota Camry Hybrid (EPA rated 33 MPG city).

Ford has high hopes for its reinvigorated midsize offering, and the Fusion Hybrid most certainly will be leading its efforts.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 8:11:43 AM , Rating: 1
RE: Fugly
By Lord 666 on 11/3/2008 8:17:56 AM , Rating: 2
Is that your YELLOW Cobalt in the background?


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/08, Rating: 0
RE: Fugly
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 11/3/2008 8:34:28 AM , Rating: 3
WOW, a two-door Cadillac Catera, err, Opel Omega. That design is straight out of the mid-90s and should have never come to the U.S. market looking like that.

I'll take the new Nissan 370Z. It should rip the new Camaro a new one given how lightweight it will be:

338 HP
270 lb-ft
3144 lbs.

That's compared to 3,741 lbs for the Camaro V6 (300HP) and 3,860 lbs for the Camaro SS (400HP).

http://i36.tinypic.com/ieeejm.jpg
http://i38.tinypic.com/317b0yf.jpg


RE: Fugly
By theapparition on 11/3/2008 9:05:16 AM , Rating: 2
Nice try.
The new 6 speed Camaro will have the LS3 and is conservatively listed at 425+hp and even more importantly 400+ft-lbs. The automatic will have the L99 and 400hp engine.
While I'm definately disappointed at the weight, it will still boast a better power-weight ratio than the 370Z. Torque is key when talking about launches and the 370Z will NOT be competitive. In fact, it will get thoroughly destroyed in most tests. 370Z would have the edge in handling tests.

However, you're trying to compare 2 completely different animals. I don't think many potential buyers of either car would seriously consider the other one.

Personally, I'm not excited about the Camaro. Butt ass ugly (not a fan of either the Challenger/Charger or retro Mustang designs either), and the interior is undoubtedly the fugliest I've seen in a long time.

However, your comment about the GTO being an Opel is off base. It's a direct Holden Monaro with Pontiac "look at me cladding". Even though the styling is cavalier bland, it's a remarkably good handling car, is very comfortable to drive and live with, and has excellent performance. It also should not be confused as a sports car.......the GTO is more of a tourer and competed with similarly priced BMW's, just like the G8 (Holden Commodore) does now.


RE: Fugly
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 11/3/2008 9:16:33 AM , Rating: 4
The Camaro is lumped in the same category as the Mustang, 350Z/370Z, Mazda RX-8, and the upcoming Hyundai Genesis Coupe. They're the only two-door RWD coupes available in the $25,000 -- $30,000 price bracket.

My comment about the 370Z kicking the Camaro's ass was more aimed at the V6 version, but it should also be pretty competitive with the SS.

quote:
However, your comment about the GTO being an Opel is off base. It's a direct Holden Monaro with Pontiac "look at me cladding". Even though the styling is cavalier bland...


Hmmm...

quote:
The Pontiac GTO was relaunched in the United States in 2004, based on the Holden Monaro's V platform. The Monaro is a 2 door coupe variant of the Australian developed VT/VX Holden Commodore. The Commodore was in turn developed by enlarging the European designed 1994 Opel Omega B, which was marketed in its original form in the U.S. from 1997 to 2001 as the Cadillac Catera. The revival was prompted by former GM chairman Bob Lutz,[1] who drove a Holden Monaro while on a business trip in Australia.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_GTO#2004


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 11:10:00 AM , Rating: 1
You're comparing the base model V6 Camaro to the Nissan when the Nissan will be the same price as the V8 Camaro? Not exactly a fair comparison.


RE: Fugly
By theapparition on 11/3/2008 11:58:15 AM , Rating: 2
Sort of......

Even though the original Monaro and Commodore shared a platform, the platform itself was redesigned from the Omega/Catera that came before it.

Yes, there may have been evolutionary clues, but you can hardly call it a Catera pt II.

The newer Commodores are on a completely different platform, the rear drive zeta platform.


RE: Fugly
By Reclaimer77 on 11/3/2008 10:17:59 AM , Rating: 3
I am SO sick of the " retro " styling trend that has pervasively taken over American styling.

And the Camaro... wth ? Why would I pay that much money for a " retro " looking car that was designed before I was even born ? When for a bit more cheddar, I can get a Corvette which has WORLD CLASS performance and looks like a sleek, smoothed, merchant of ass kicking.

This is why the new Camaro will fail just like the old F body ones did. The price difference when compared to the 'Vette just isn't compelling enough to buy a vastly inferior car. I'm sure it has appeal for a huge minority of people who were actually around when clunky, ugly, crap car designs were " in ", but for the rest of us no thanks.


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 11:07:16 AM , Rating: 1
$10-15,000 is a pretty big price difference.


RE: Fugly
By The0ne on 11/3/2008 11:22:20 AM , Rating: 3
Maybe because they can't come up with good designs anymore :) Where are the exotic concept vehicles where you pick and choose what goes into production. Well, why spend the time and money doing that when you can live off the fat of your previous models. This idea only works so far in term of life cycle. Eventually consumers would want something that is different, even if only visual.


RE: Fugly
By Reclaimer77 on 11/3/2008 5:47:44 PM , Rating: 2
Well yeah, and when they do come up with something different its the equivalent of optical rape. Like the Pontiac Aztec...

*shivers*


RE: Fugly
By theapparition on 11/3/2008 12:09:21 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
This is why the new Camaro will fail just like the old F body ones did.

The old F-bodies were incredible bargains. They sold far more of them than Vettes. Realisticly, it was a 10-15k difference between a C5 and F-body at the end. That's enough of a dealbreaker for many of the buyers (for the finanace crowd, an extra $300/mo). It was sad to see them go, only to be replaced by this monstrosity.

Just like the Thunderbird, VW Beetle, PT Cruiser, Mustang, Charger, Challenger, and every other retro car model. They will sell like hotcakes for a few years, than people will get sick of them again and sales will free fall. Mustang sales are down 40% this year alone, after sales had already declined from the previous year. Local Dodge dealerships have Challengers sitting on the lots!

My heads/cam TransAm is running like a champ, and I'll always be fond of it. But the vettes are just soooooo much better car in every way. Worth every penny of the price difference.


RE: Fugly
By Reclaimer77 on 11/3/2008 5:44:28 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The old F-bodies were incredible bargains. They sold far more of them than Vettes.


Uhhh the reason the F bodies were boxed was because of lack of sales. So I'm not sure I agree. Vettes might not have sold as much in volume as the F bodies, but EVERY 'Vette that rolled off the lines were sold. The F bodies , year after year, were amassing large unsold surpluses.

They might have been great cars, but at the end I remember the WS-6 and SS models were dangerously approaching Corvette pricing. I mean, what were they thinking. If I can finance a WS-6, then I can damn sure find a way to sink another 10k into a loan and just get a 'Vette. Why bother with the 'other white meat ' ?

quote:
Local Dodge dealerships have Challengers sitting on the lots!


I have noticed that. Is it just me or does the new Challenger just not cut the mustard ?

quote:
But the vettes are just soooooo much better car in every way. Worth every penny of the price difference.


Totally agree and thats all I'm saying.


RE: Fugly
By theapparition on 11/4/2008 7:02:38 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Uhhh the reason the F bodies were boxed was because of lack of sales.

Lack of sales compared to GM's projections. They wanted it to be sales competitive with the Mustang, which it couldn't match. Pricing was based on projected volume, and when the volume wasn't there, the car wasn't as profitable as they wanted. However, by the numbers, in 2002 (last year of sales) the F-bodies sold about 3x the number of Corvettes. That was a similar trend throughout the life of the 4th gen F-bodies.

quote:
EVERY 'Vette that rolled off the lines were sold. The F bodies , year after year, were amassing large unsold surpluses.

I'll agree/disagree with that. Z28/WS6 models were very hard to find and the ones that you did were commanding huge markups in 2002. V6 models.......well, they did sit. I mean, who wants to deal with all the quirks of the F-body if it doesn't have the power to go with it?

10K extra into a loan is just not feasible for many. That could have been the difference between a $500 loan and a $700 loan.

Don't get me wrong, I love the Vette, have 3 of them myself (C6 Z06, C6 vert, C5 targa) and also a TransAm. While the vettes are better at most, for some things, the F-bodies were better at. For drag racing, the solid rear and much cheaper cost of parts (for the same f-ing part, mind you), made entry prices for a car that could do 90% of the vette a relative bargain.


RE: Fugly
By arsmitty86 on 11/3/2008 11:04:55 AM , Rating: 3
Also bear in mind that while it might beat it stock that even the V6 Camaro is using the Caddy direct injection motor. Easily will handle more power with FI. And for the price (24k) vs the cheapest 370 probably starting at 29 you could take the extra 5k and mod the car to walk on a lot of different stuff.


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 11:12:34 AM , Rating: 1
Yeah that Caddy V6 is a pretty damn nice engine to have as the base model Camaro motor. Easily destroys the Mustang's V6.


RE: Fugly
By theapparition on 11/3/2008 9:35:01 AM , Rating: 2
Nice '06 Spice Red


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 11:08:13 AM , Rating: 2
Thanks. Loving it. Already got a Volant CAI on the way and might be picking up a slightly used Corsa catback for $500.


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 11:13:52 AM , Rating: 3
Maybe I should get a front license plate that says like "Planet Killer" or something on it. Just to piss of the hippies.


RE: Fugly
By on 11/3/2008 2:54:28 PM , Rating: 1
You're an idiot if you think only hippies care about the environment.


RE: Fugly
By Spuke on 11/3/2008 5:48:29 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
You're an idiot if you think only hippies care about the environment.
Normal people DO care about the environment, for sure just not to the extreme that hippies do. Hell, I care too, but I, nor will regular people go unnecessarily out of our way to "save" it. It's like donating to charity. You just do what you can.


RE: Fugly
By corduroygt on 11/4/2008 1:17:11 PM , Rating: 3
I care about the environment, but we got the same car :)
Mine is a 06 Silver/Red interior, Manual with 18" wheels.
I guzzled many gallons of gas to put 32k miles on it.


RE: Fugly
By Reclaimer77 on 11/3/2008 10:06:32 AM , Rating: 2
Looks like a Grand Prix with a hoodscoop. /shrug.


RE: Fugly
By theapparition on 11/3/2008 11:50:53 AM , Rating: 2
Until you line up against it.

I'm not a fan of it's styling either, but have the utmost respect for thier performance.


RE: Fugly
By Samus on 11/4/2008 4:04:31 AM , Rating: 2
In a straight line...

Their performance is great until you turn the wheel and barrol roll off the road.

A friend of mine is a paraplegic because of a piece of shit G8 flipping over on an off ramp. You know a Mustang GT with 50-year-old suspension beats one through a slalom.

That's why the Focus SVT deserves respect...for bringing something other than straight-line power to the American performance market, at the most reasonable price.


RE: Fugly
By theapparition on 11/4/2008 7:13:21 AM , Rating: 2
And I'm sure your friend was doing the speed limit for that off ramp too.....:rollseyes:

When you do stupid things in any car, it's bound to catch up to you.

Here's your first clue......the G8 is not a sports car, neither was the GTO. They would more accurately be described as touring cars, competing with BMW's, et.al.
Suspension is not designed for performance, but rather comfort. I'm sure no one has ever rolled a BMW either......:rollseyes again:.

With a full Pedders suspension, the GTO can handle with the best of them, but that's not how the car was intened. You get plenty of the same idiots losing control of thier POS nitrous powered Civics, and wonder why. The car was never intended to have that much horsepower, and any excess overwhelms the suspension and tires, causing loss of control.

Modding cars is a science, not an art, and for certain power levels, there are things that need to be done to upgrade the entire package. It's also not cheap.


RE: Fugly
By Reclaimer77 on 11/4/2008 1:53:40 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
With a full Pedders suspension, the GTO can handle with the best of them,


Thats a joke and you know it. Please define " them ". Upgrades help, but the car is a pig.


RE: Fugly
By Spuke on 11/4/2008 3:24:07 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Thats a joke and you know it. Please define " them ". Upgrades help, but the car is a pig.
Most heavy cars ARE pigs but even pigs can be made to go fast with the right know how and some money. Look at the new BMW M3. It weighs about the same as the GTO did and I'm sure that it could outhandle a SVT Focus.


RE: Fugly
By Spuke on 11/3/2008 12:13:23 PM , Rating: 2
You finally got your GTO!!! Congrats dude! How long have you had it?


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 12:30:56 PM , Rating: 2
Four days.


RE: Fugly
By impulsegto on 11/4/2008 5:00:31 PM , Rating: 2
Nice, I've had my '04 GTO since it rolled off the line in Ozland. :)


RE: Fugly
By Drexial on 11/3/2008 2:55:32 PM , Rating: 3
Its not really a north American car though, its Australian.

http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/200...

Its 90% Vauxhall. Not that I'm complaining, but I like the Vauxhall style far better.


RE: Fugly
By Drexial on 11/3/2008 2:58:35 PM , Rating: 2
OOps I actually meant Holden... Vauxhall is the UK version. Holden the Australian.


"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki