backtop


Print 84 comment(s) - last by kmmatney.. on Oct 30 at 4:45 PM

A long awaited solar power milestone for unconcentrated silicon PV cells has been reached, thanks to steady improvement and research

While many traditional fossil fuel technologies show slow growth in efficiency and design, solar power has instead yielded steady and rapid advances.  While many question why a "killer app" solar product has not yet reached the market after years of hype, it is hard to deny the fact that solar costs both subsidized and unsubsidized have been dropping dramatically, being halved every 10 years. 

With current costs ranging from 15 to 20 cents per kWh, and wholesale coal power costs between 1.5 and 2.5 cents per kWh (and nuclear in a similar range -- 1.7 cents per kWh by estimates from the Nuclear Energy Institute), solar still has a ways to go and likely a few decades before being ready for full deployment.  Still, few technologies show the rapid growth in efficiency solar has and few utilize such a common resource as silicon, so the value of ongoing solar research is apparent.

UNSW's ARC Photovoltaic Centre of Excellence reported a significant milestone this week, with the announcement of the world's first 25 percent efficient unconcentrated solar silicon cells.  They had previously held the 24.7 percent efficient silicon cell record, but were denied the 25 percent milestone due to gaps in the understanding of sunlight and its effect on silicon.

New research has led to revisions in how incident light efficiency is calculated.  As a result, their record-holding design has reached the 25 percent mark, a "magic" number according to many industry experts.  The cell, designed by Professors Martin Green and Stuart Wenham has a wide lead over competitive offerings, according to the Centre.  UNSW holds six solar world records now.

Centre Executive Research Director, Scientia Professor Martin Green described how the new research improved the understanding of the efficiency.  He states, "Since the weights of the colours in sunlight change during the day, solar cells are measured under a standard colour spectrum defined under typical operational meteorological conditions.  Improvements in understanding atmospheric effects upon the colour content of sunlight led to a revision of the standard spectrum in April. The new spectrum has a higher energy content both down the blue end of the spectrum and at the opposite red end with, dare I say it, relatively less green."

While suggesting less green of anything may seem like heresy in the alternative energy industry, it’s good news for the Centre as it means their cells are operating more efficiently than expected.  The Centre's cell posted larger gains than its competitors following the revision.  It is now 6 percent more efficient than the next most efficient competitor, according to Professor Green.

The Centre's cell is approaching the important 29 percent efficiency threshold -- the maximum theoretical efficiency for a first generation silicon photovoltaic solar cell.  Dr Anita Ho-Baillie, who heads the Centre's high efficiency cell research effort, says the new research is a big boost "because our cells push the boundaries of response into the extremities of the spectrum."

She states, "Blue light is absorbed strongly, very close to the cell surface where we go to great pains to make sure it is not wasted. Just the opposite, the red light is only weakly absorbed and we have to use special design features to trap it into the cell."

Professor Green states, "These light-trapping features make our cells act as if they were much thicker than they are. This already has had an important spin-off in allowing us to work with CSG Solar to develop commercial 'thin-film' silicon-on-glass solar cells that are over 100 times thinner than conventional silicon cells."

The biggest goal of UNSW is now to adapt the ultra-high efficiency cells for mass production which should lead to more cost reductions.  ARC Centre Director, Professor Stuart Wenham, adds,"Our main efforts now are focused on getting these efficiency improvements into commercial production.  Production compatible versions of our high efficiency technology are being introduced into production as we speak."

The center has a close relationship with the world's biggest solar manufacturers, thanks in part to Dr Jianhua Zhao and Dr Aihua Wang, who fabricated the record-setting cell and have since left the Centre to establish China Sunergy, one of the world's largest photovoltaic manufacturers.  Professor Green describes, "China was the largest manufacturer of solar cells internationally in 2007 with 70 per cent of the output from companies with our former UNSW students either Chief Executive Officers or Chief Technical Officers."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Cost Comparison totally bogus
By jiminmpls on 10/24/2008 11:07:04 AM , Rating: 1
"With current costs ranging from 15 to 20 cents per kWh, and wholesale coal power costs between 1.5 and 2.5 cents per kWh (and nuclear in a similar range -- 1.7 cents per kWh by estimates from the Nuclear Energy Institute),"

This is a totally bogus comparison. You are comparing the capital costs of solar (while ignoring the nearly zero operational cost) with the operational cost of coal and nuclear (and ignoring the exhorbitant and rapidly increasing capital costs.)

Current projections for the cost of new nuclear power in the US is in the 10-12c/kWh range. Furthermore, 92% of the fuel used in civilian nuclear power plants is imported - 32% from Russia. Uranium prices have more than doubled since 2006 and contract pricing for 2012 delivery is five times higher than current prices.




RE: Cost Comparison totally bogus
By fgordon on 10/24/2008 11:23:37 AM , Rating: 2
True - I think that is what many don't bear in mind - nuclear power makes the US far more dependend of foreign countries than any other form of energy.

And depending the most important part of a modern society - the energy - mainly on foreign countries is probably not a really good choice. (e.g. if you see how Russia is using oil/gas deliveries in some countries for political influence)

Of course we live in a globalized world but energy-production is too important to totally depend on others.


RE: Cost Comparison totally bogus
By Spuke on 10/24/2008 12:23:19 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
True - I think that is what many don't bear in mind - nuclear power makes the US far more dependend of foreign countries than any other form of energy.
100-32=68. So how are we "far more dependend of foreign countries" again?


RE: Cost Comparison totally bogus
By menace on 10/24/2008 6:38:49 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Current projections for the cost of new nuclear power in the US is in the 10-12c/kWh range.

This is the typical "greenie" estimate that assumes the bottom feeder environmental lawyers fight tooth and nail to delay construction of every plant for at least a dozen years and then another bazillion dollars to deal with the waste and probably throw in another bazillion in costs to clean up a massive reactor failure that they think is bound to happen every ten years...

If that cost projection was accurate then what company in their right mind would attempt to build another reactor?


RE: Cost Comparison totally bogus
By andrinoaa on 10/25/2008 7:09:00 AM , Rating: 2
Congratulations, you have stumbled into the real world!
Oh, you forgot about the cost of storage for all the waste that has to be maintained for at least a couple of thousand years- whats the name of the mountain?
Fusion is still getting a mention. What about new generation reactors you say, VAPOURWARE! lol
may as well enjoy solar power!


"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki