backtop


Print 83 comment(s) - last by fibreoptik.. on Oct 23 at 4:04 PM


GreenFuel experimented with growing algae in tubes and bags at its Arizona pilot farm. While most of its competitors are sticking to these methods, GreenFuels has developed a closely-guarded greenhouse technologies which grows algae at higher yields and an automated system to harvest the crop. It will be debutting this setup at a commercial scale plant in Spain, to be complete in 2011.  (Source: PetroAlgae)
Algae company's harvest will make biodiesel, nutritious livestock feed

Many in the alternative fuels industry agree that algae is where the mid-range future of the biodiesel industry lies.  While fuels such as ethanol and cellulosic ethanol may prevail in the short term, algae is seen as the final stepping stone before full synthetic gasoline production.  This value is due to algae's ability to grow rich long chain hydrocarbons.  When algae is genetically engineered, it can produce large amounts of oil that is essentially diesel grade. 

The big question with algae tech is not whether it will arrive, but when it will arrive.  DailyTech had previously followed Cambridge, Mass. based GreenFuel Technologies' effort to bring its specially bred algae to the market.  The company, founded by MIT graduates, had built a pilot farm in Arizona, previously.  By growing algae in tubes, it found that algae would get optimal sun exposure.  Its only problem was that it grew too much algae, blocking out light, and eventually killing part of the crop.

Now GreenFuel is taking its experience and has become the first algae company to announce a profitable business deal and the construction of a commercial scale growth facility.   Spain's Aurantia, a leading alternative energy investment firm, has agreed to pay GreenFuels $92M to build a 100 hectacre (250 acre) algae farm.  The farm will produce 25,000 tons of biomass yearly.

GreenFuel, which recently celebrated its 7th anniversary, already has a 100 square-meter prototype greenhouse operating at the site in Spain.  GreenFuel ditched the growing tubes, opting for a top-secret tubeless proprietary growing process, one which includes automated harvesting.  Thus far the company has declined to reveal the secretive workings of this new design.

It has, however, announced its intention to scale the production up quickly.  It plans to have a 1,000 square-meter installation online by the end of the year.  The full farm is scheduled to be completed by 2011. 

The plant will take carbon dioxide emissions from the nearby Holcim cement plant near Jerez, Spain and use it to increase algae yields.  This will cut down on Holcim cement plant near Jerez, Spain, almost 10 percent of the factory's output.  This will help the factory meet tougher emissions standards.

The developers are in the process of selecting which strains of algae to grow.  Certain strains are optimized for biodiesel production; bred to produce extra oil.  Other strains produce extra nutrients like protein and make for more nutritious animal feed.

CEO Simon Upfill-Brown acknowledges that the field is full of overly optimistic visions, but insists his company is firmly grounded in reality and a series of successful trials.  He states, "Some people are making clearly outrageous claims. We're at the stage where we can say we are pretty comfortable and very optimistic that we're getting all the way there in phases."

One trouble spot for the upcoming farm is falling gas prices.  With gas low, it may be harder for the farm's biodiesel production to be economically competitive.  This was cited as the resaon for rival Imperium Renewables' delay of its plan to launch a smaller algae farm in Hawaii.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: ...at least partial fail...
By walk2k on 10/21/2008 1:04:44 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe you should read the FAQ before you pretend to internet-know so much about the process.

http://www.greenfuelonline.com/contact_faq.html

Also I found this particularly entertaining:
quote:
output produces more energy than it took to produce it
Uh yeah, just change the first law of thermodynamics, sure we'll get right on that.


RE: ...at least partial fail...
By bhieb on 10/21/2008 1:35:22 PM , Rating: 1
Why are you so hostile, take a deep breath and relax. He wasn't pretending to know everything. Just the opposite most of his comment was presented as questions open for debate/comment (weird place for it too huh in the comments section /sarcasm). He simply stated a concern about the logistics involved in irrigation in a desert environment.

A simple "according to the FAQ" it is a closed system would have sufficed you don't have to be a prick.

Very few people read every link to every outside source on every page. In fact you don't or you would not be back here so soon trolling around, because I'm sure there are links on greenfuelonline.com that, by your standard you should read and links on those sub pages that you should read, and links on those sub sub pages you should read. So follow your own advice and we'll see you back in 200 years or so when your done with all that.


By ChronoReverse on 10/21/2008 1:37:30 PM , Rating: 2
Taken out of context it does sound absurd but the energy input is obvious the human factor whereas the energy we get out is acquired from the Sun. This is, after all, basically a method to harvest solar energy.


RE: ...at least partial fail...
By Jim28 on 10/21/2008 2:27:39 PM , Rating: 2
Don't be such a tool!

All and I mean all of our current energy production methods harvest more energy from those processes than it took to establish those processes. (Otherwise economical power generation is not possible.) Obviously energy is not created. However if you put in more/equal energy into a process in order to release the potential energy of the fuel in the resultant reaction, then you have achieved nothing.

I will try laymans terms so you can get it. If a power plant generates 100MW, but in turn requires 90MW to function, then it does not make sense. A typical desired ratio is at least 2/1 output/input more desireable of course is 5/1 and 10/1. I forgot the actual numbers for typical processes today. Been a long time since my thermo classes. To be honest I don't miss thermo!


“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki