Print 109 comment(s) - last by Tavoc.. on Oct 21 at 4:34 PM

A Northrop-Grummond built DSP satellite. These current satellites only detect ballistic missile launches, rather than shoot them down.
New $5M study is first allocated since work was halted 15 years ago.

Congress recently approved a $5 million grant to begin study of space-based missile defenses. This marks the first time money has been allocated to the program since work on space-based systems was canceled in the 1990s by President Clinton. Two years ago, Congress rejected a similar proposal.

According to Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ), the threat of missile proliferation has grown rapidly since the 1990s. A total of 120 nations now have ballistic missile technology, he said, and nations like North Korea and Iran are not only developing the technology, but selling it on the open market. Missile defense systems are growing as well; 27 nations now have some form of missile defense.

The most recent annual report from the Pentagon highlighted the growing threat of accidental or intentional launch of ballistic missiles, as well as the vulnerability of U.S. satellites to attack, as evidenced by China's 2007 missile test, which destroyed a satellite in orbit.

A defense official commenting on the proposal told the Washington Times that space-based ABM systems are necessary for global, rapid defense, "It's really the only way to defend the U.S. and its allies from anywhere on the planet". The official said such defenses were last considered during the late 1980s, as part of the Global Protection Against Limited Strike, or GPALS, a multi-prong system which used ground and sea-based interceptors, along with space-based platforms. The plan was cancelled by the Clinton Administration, which focused all work on short-range missiles only.

The U.S. announced last year that its ground-based Star Wars' missile defense system was operational and ready for use, though capable at present of covering only parts of the U.S. Plans to expand the system in Europe are under way.

Despite claims to the contrary, China is also apparently working on similar proposals, says China military affairs specialist Richard Fisher. The program, which China says it halted in the 1960s, has apparently been restarted with such systems as the SC-19 anti-satellite missile. According to Fisher, China is also trying to deploy space-warfare weapons, aircraft carrier groups, and a much larger MIRV'ed version of its nuclear ballistic missile arsenal.

Fisher, author of the new book, "China's Military Modernization: Building for Regional and Global Reach", says that by 2020, China "will be well on their way to assembling all the elements of global power that [the U.S.] has today".

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Satelite anti ICBM is so easy to shoot down.
By Ascanius on 10/18/2008 12:45:18 PM , Rating: 3
I find this proposal directly offensive to any kind of intelligence as most know that Satelite Anti ICBM is so easy to shoot down.

Both Russia and China can shoot down any satelite if they want to and have made clear statement about it, just as how hillarioues they fund the U.S. star wars program.

You can shoot them down with a whole array of things, right from laser, railgun, missile barrage "several missiles at once" and alst but not known to must, Zepto weapons, working on the Physics of the primary state of matter, Ether, call it what you want.

This is just another "lets make weapons/war to make the economy better" nothing else and it disgust me, especially when it comes so cheap, like here in Denmark where they want us building submarines that have no place in modern warfare worth talking about.

By masher2 on 10/18/2008 12:50:24 PM , Rating: 1
> "Both Russia and China can shoot down any satelite if they want to and have made clear statement about it, just as how hillarioues they fund the U.S. star wars program"

Which proves how effective they believe it really is. If they truly believed space-based ABM technology was worthless, they'd just keep mum and allow the US to squander resources on it.

The fact is, the Soviets -- and now the Russians -- have fought the deployment of ABM technology bitterly. . . because they realize how such a widespread system would undermine their own military power, which is predicated upon their ability to decimate any nation on the planet with nuclear ballistic missiles.

"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki