backtop


Print 83 comment(s) - last by just4U.. on Oct 25 at 4:24 AM

Will Microsoft's new service pack reinvigorate Vista sales on the eve of Windows 7?

Microsoft is preparing new service packs for Windows Vista and its server counterpart, Windows Server 2008.  The pair of service packs, according to sources, will likely land before the release of Windows 7 which is set to debut in late 2009 or early 2010.  Microsoft confirmed that the project was in the works, with a Vista spokesman saying, "Microsoft is working on a second Windows Vista service pack (Windows Vista SP2) and will share more details in the coming months."

Windows Vista already saw the release of its first service pack in May of this year.  The first release was marred by compatibility difficulties, which forced Microsoft to take it offline for a short time.  Amid slower than-hoped-for adoption growth, Microsoft launched a reinvigorated push to convince people to adopt Windows Vista, highlighted by its "I'm a PC" commercials.

Reports indicate that Microsoft is hard at work preparing the second generation service packs, to help further this new campaign.  It has reportedly delivered a beta of the Vista pack to select hardware and software partners.  This is similar to its current distribution method for early builds of Windows 7.  Microsoft also posted a placeholder article for Vista SP2 on its Knowledge Base site.

Details on the new packs are scarce, but sources with Microsoft say that the biggest deliverable for the Server version will be the integration of Hyper-V bits with it.  Sources also say the reason Microsoft is pushing to release the pack before Windows 7 is to limit confusion about whether to upgrade to Windows 7 or choose the newly more functional Vista.

The service pack for Windows Server 2008 will also reportedly be called SP2, despite it being the first service pack for the OS.  This because Windows Server 2008 was built on Vista with the SP1 service pack included.  Still, the first real service pack for the server OS will be an essential boost as many corporate partners are hesitant to buy an OS without service packs.

Microsoft is remaining tight-lipped about the server SP2 as well, except to acknowledge that its coming soon.  A Microsoft spokesperson stated, "[The] comment [on Vista] serves for Windows Server as well; Microsoft is not commenting further on the timing/release plans for the WS08 SP2 at this time, but will share more details in the coming months."

The Beta 1 releases for the two SP2s are expected within the next couple months.  This will put some pressure on Microsoft's developer team to quickly complete the service pack, as the Windows 7 Beta 1 is slated for mid-December release.

It is rumored that Microsoft may be including some aspects of Windows 7's functionality into Vista via the new service packs.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Limit confusion?
By HaZaRd2K6 on 10/17/2008 12:15:21 PM , Rating: 2
Oh no. God forbid we should upgrade computers every once in a blue moon.

No thanks, I'll stick with my Pentium Pro running Windows 3.1...

Seriously, new operating systems take advantage of new hardware. If you don't have the hardware to run the OS, then don't use it in the first place. It's really simple. It's also starting to get really annoying to hear people with 10-year old computers who are bitching because Vista won't run. Duh.


RE: Limit confusion?
By MonkeyPaw on 10/17/2008 4:19:15 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah, I refuse to buy unleaded gas. Only leaded for me and my 1970 LTD! I do a lot of walking, but that beats supporting unleaded gas.


RE: Limit confusion?
By aj28 on 10/17/2008 10:08:24 PM , Rating: 2
The problem isn't so much that people don't want to upgrade their computers, it's that they walk into a store and want the absolute cheapest one. On top of that, they already think Vista sucks because of what their neighbor's best friend said and absolutely lament the idea of replacing their evidently flawless XP box despite the performance benefits of newer machines. Vendors don't make the situation any better, cramming loads and loads of their own software on top of what Vista is already sporting, even on their low-end machines.

Take a brand new HP out of the box and it'll be running anywhere from 70 to 90 processes by the time it hits the desktop. Take 30 seconds, absolutely gut your MSConfig startup and services tabs of anything and everything non-Microsoft, and you'll soon find yourself with anywhere from 30 to 40.

Better yet, make use of that OEM key on the bottom, slap on a clean install of Vista, and enjoy =)


RE: Limit confusion?
By n00bxqb on 10/17/2008 11:11:56 PM , Rating: 3
I couldn't have said it better myself.

I love how the only mention of SP1 in this article in relation to Vista (as opposed to Server 2008) seems to imply that it was a failure. SP1 fixed TONS of issues that Vista had and easily put it on par (or better, IMO) with XP SP2 in terms of reliability.


RE: Limit confusion?
By Cypherdude1 on 10/18/2008 2:38:40 PM , Rating: 1
If the Vista SP1 patch "fixed TONS of issues that Vista had", WHY did Microsoft release Vista <SP1? WHY did Microsoft release Vista before it was ready? Was Microsoft so short on cash they had to release Vista early thereby cheating every single Windows customer in the world, all 250 million of them? Was Steve Ballmer so, IMO, in dire need of his stock options going higher that he just had to release Vista before it was ready?

B ^D
quote:
SP1 fixed TONS of issues that Vista had and easily put it on par (or better, IMO) with XP SP2 in terms of reliability


"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki