Print 59 comment(s) - last by Shadowmaster62.. on Oct 9 at 1:54 PM

AMD Shanghai hopes to erase bad memories of Barcelona

AMD has proven to be a tough opponent for Intel in the server processor marketplace. AMD said that its latest architecture dubbed Shanghai is now ready to go. Shanghai parts are quad-core processors that are targeted at the server market.

Shanghai is also AMD's first 45-nanometer processor. AMD's last big architecture aimed at the server marketplace was the Barcelona processor that ran into significant problems in the market. One of the biggest issues with Barcelona was that the processors were delayed for eight months after their introduction.

Once the processors were finally shipped and available, AMD had issues with the performance of the parts and the CPUs suffered from other glitches. AMD promises that Shanghai will not be another Barcelona.

Pat Patla, AMD server and workstation business general manager, told CNET News, "We had some mis-starts in getting Barcelona to market and wanted to bring as much velocity to Shanghai as possible. Learn from our mistakes and, as a company, never do that again."

To help ensure that Shanghai succeeds and offer users a better experience than Barcelona, AMD put one engineer in charge of the entire Shanghai project. Patla continued saying, "the product that we put in the hands of our partners is going to be of substantial stability so they can do lots of early validation."

To improve the performance of Shanghai over Barcelona, AMD is counting on several factors. First is the move from the 65nm process of Barcelona to the 45nm process used in Shanghai. This will allow for more efficiency and better performance than Barcelona.

AMD is also moving the cache memory from 2MB to 6MB to improve performance and it says that instructions per clock cycle will be increased as well. Shanghai will also utilize AMD's HyperTransport 3, which AMD expects to be validated in Q1 2009. A 45nm desktop Shanghai part will be offered in Q1 2009 according to CNET News.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Just in time for Nehalem...
By therealnickdanger on 9/30/2008 4:00:10 PM , Rating: 2
I just don't like having multiple computers on different platforms, as weird as that sounds. I kind of go with platform generations when purchasing without mixing and matching for a number of years at a time:

Socket 5 with early Pentiums
Socket 7 with K6-2s
Slot A for Athlon!
Socket 478 with Netburst (meh, wish I had held out for Socket 775 or Socket 939)
Almost went Socket AM2, but waited for Conroe on Socket 775 (kickass)

So now I'm waiting on Socket 1156 (Nehalem) and to see what AMD can do with Socket AM3...

RE: Just in time for Nehalem...
By Master Kenobi on 9/30/2008 4:23:36 PM , Rating: 2
Socket 1366 Nehalem would be a better bet, also comes with the tripple channel memory (6-Dimm's)

RE: Just in time for Nehalem...
By Alexvrb on 9/30/2008 10:17:34 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, cause I want to have to start buying three-packs of matched DIMMs. :P

It won't matter to most people, of course. But for some enthusiasts who want the most out of their memory, that's where its at. Either that or you chance it and just get individual DIMMs, maybe buy sticks that overshoot your original goal.

By therealnickdanger on 10/1/2008 7:44:26 AM , Rating: 2
Oops, my bad: 1366, not 1156.

“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith
Related Articles
AMD Unveils "Barcelona" Architecture
September 7, 2007, 3:03 PM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki