Print 101 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Sep 29 at 6:30 PM

Texting on the road -- it won't "be back"

Everyone knows that text messaging while driving can be dangerously distracting.  A recent study revealed that texting is more dangerous to driving than drugs or alcohol.  Still many are fighting proposed legislation to ban texting while driving, complaining that it violates freedom and would limit options in an emergency.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has taken a hard stance on texting while driving.  He championed and passed a ban on cell phone texting, which will go into effect January 1.  Offending motorists will pay $20 on their first violation, and $50 for each subsequent violation.  Gov. Schwarzenegger was pleased to push through the bill by California's Tuesday legislative deadline.

He hopes that the new bill will help dissuade drivers from using their cell phones when driving.  He states, "Banning electronic text messaging while driving will keep drivers' hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road, making our roadways a safer place for all Californians."

Following the September 12 collision between a Metrolink passenger train and a freight train, which killed 25 people and injured 135, and was possibly caused by railroad engineer texting, the California Public Utilities Commission has banned some railroad workers from texting on the job.

California also passed a ban on holding cell phones while driving, which took effect July 1.  The law only allows drivers to use hands-free headsets while driving.  Insurers, bicyclists and, interestingly, cell phone companies supported both bills.

Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), who wrote the new law, SB 28, and worked closely with Schwarzenegger states, "When somebody's distracted it puts not just the driver at risk but everybody else in the car and everybody else on the highway."

For those who think Gov. Schwarzenegger and California's traffic agency are joking about the ban, they might want to consider the figures on the recent ban on holding cell phones.  According to Tom Marshall, a spokesman for the California Highway Patrol, California state officers issued 19,753 citations to motorists.  This is in addition to the thousands more issued by local police departments.  While less drivers are stopped for the offense then speeding, the numbers add up Marshall said.  He states, "Why everybody isn't hands-free now, I have no idea."

Many states are considering similar laws, or already have such laws in place.  However, with the bipartisan leadership of the nation's most populous state taking a high-profile stand against text-and-drive, the new legislation may spread throughout the nation.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Moving Violations
By wallijonn on 9/25/2008 10:53:00 AM , Rating: 3
A $20 ticket is nothing. The fine should be $500 for the first offence, $2500 for the second, $5000 for the third; with driver safety school attendance mandatory at the first, 30 days drivers suspension on the second and a 5 year ban on the third. Any accident which can be directly attributed to text messaging while driving should carry a $10,000 fine and 90 days in jail, $5000 if just a cell phone was used, with 30 days in jail.

Here in Phoenix the moving violation fine for DUI is $6000. Now we need hands free mobile driving law and a ban on text messaging. Why should the text messaging fine be any less than a DUI? The drunk can say that he had both hands on the wheel, the text messager has none.

RE: Moving Violations
By monomer on 9/25/2008 11:00:26 AM , Rating: 3
Heck, why stop at suspending their driver's licence? Since these people obviously can't go without texting for a few minutes, losing their right to own a cell-phone would help curtail the problem.

RE: Moving Violations
By daniyarm on 9/25/2008 11:39:52 AM , Rating: 4
Exactly. Block their messaging for 1 year and fine them $1000. Seriously, if they say texting is more dangerous than a DUI, then make the punishment as severe as a DUI at the very least. Why are they getting less of a punishment for a worse crime.

RE: Moving Violations
By chris2618 on 9/25/2008 2:09:49 PM , Rating: 2
i think it should have a worse punishment than DUI. As when you are drunk you are sort of not totally in control but when people are texting when driving they really do know what they are doing

RE: Moving Violations
By jimbojimbo on 9/25/2008 3:52:21 PM , Rating: 2
I live in the city with the highest sales tax in the US. I say raise fines for cell phone use while driving and let us law abiding citizens keep our hard earned money.

I suggest in the cases of multiple offenses that they be significantly increased. If it's $50 for texting, and say $50 for failure to signal, doing both would be a fine of $250 instead. Something along those lines.

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki