Print 72 comment(s) - last by Xavitar.. on Sep 28 at 5:55 PM

Could eventually be deployed at airports, border crossings, and other public gatherings

Security personnel working for the Department of Homeland Security may soon be able to remotely monitor crowds for the behavioral signals of a terrorist, using a computer system that scans their pulses, body language, breathing rates, and facial temperatures.

The program, called “Future Attribute Screening Technology,” or FAST, works as a combination of custom software and crowd-monitoring body sensors, strategically placed at airports, U.S. border crossings, and other public, high-security areas.

In simulated scenarios, the DHS says FAST is accurate in detecting suspicious behavior in almost four out of five cases. One such trial, run recently at an equestrian ranch in Maryland, paid more than 140 participants $150 to walk through FAST’s sensor array; a handful of the participants were given instructions to act shifty, evasive, deceptive, or even hostile. FAST had an effective accuracy rate of “about [78 percent] on mal-intent detection, and [80 percent] on deception,” according to spokesman John Verrico.

“We're still very early on in this research, but it is looking very promising,” he said.

Individuals detected as suspicious by FAST will be pulled aside for light questioning by security staff. Information processed by the system will never be matched with names, said Verrico, and it will only be used to help security screeners decide whom to question. After that, data from FAST is discarded.

Beyond simply discarding data, Verrico points out that the system is subject to intense privacy controls (PDF).

DHS researchers are designing FAST with mobility in mind, and over the long term would like to roll out portable vehicles for use in concerts, sporting events, and other public gatherings: once the technology is perfected, writes New Scientist’s Short Sharp Science blog, FAST trucks could be as common a sighting at public gatherings as “mobile toilets and catering trucks.”

The Electronic Privacy Information Center’s John Verdi said FAST is “substantially more invasive than screening in airports,” calling it a “medical exam” that the government has no right to conduct. Critics are concerned that the program could reveal physical conditions like heart murmurs, breathing problems, and high stress levels – a blatant privacy invasion – as well as set off false alarms.

“What determines your heart rate is a whole bunch ofreasons besides hostile intent,” said Michigan State University’s Timothy Levine, an expert on deceptive behavior.

FAST appears to be yet another aspect of the U.S. – as well as the rest of the world’s – governments’ growing fascination with biometric data on citizens: the FBI’s “Next Generation Identification” system, currently still in development, seeks to catalogue almost every major identifying characteristic about the U.S. criminal population, including fingerprints, retinal prints, and tattoo/scar markings.

Like the NGI, FAST is still under development and has several years left before it is ready for widespread, public usage – if it even makes it that far. The program is in its second year in development, and has three left to go. USA Today notes that the Transportation Security Administration already has more than 2,000 human screeners doing the same thing – essentially paving the way for their replacement and more widespread deployment by FAST.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Uhh..
By imperator3733 on 9/24/2008 10:26:05 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah. An 80% success rate is just not good enough. Add to that the fact that most terrorists with bombs in their suitcase are most likely going to be calm, this just isn't going to work. I would definitely be more irritated if I had to go through this than I already am when I fly (which I hate doing). We really need a national network of super high-speed trains.

RE: Uhh..
By FITCamaro on 9/24/2008 10:39:02 AM , Rating: 2
I don't think you'll be "going through" it like a metal detector. I think it's supposed to sit out of the way like a surveillance camera.

RE: Uhh..
By Suntan on 9/24/2008 10:55:05 AM , Rating: 2
Have you never watched the Chuck Norris movies where he has to save the plane from the terrorists? They all act shifty, panicky and sweat a lot. As we don’t have the technology to clone enough Chucks to put one at each airport, this will have to do.


RE: Uhh..
By PhoenixKnight on 9/25/2008 9:00:01 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think the problem is that we don't have the technology, it's that the result of cloning Chuck Norris could be cataclysmic.

Think about this for a second: "Every month, Chuck Norris secretly has sex with every woman in the world. They bleed for a week as a result." Would you really want you're girlfriend/wife to have multiple periods every month from multiple Chuck Norii? I don't think so.

And if two Chuck Norii ever got into a fight with each other, the resulting melee would almost certainly destroy the world, if not the entire universe!

There are some laws of nature that must never be tampered with!

RE: Uhh..
By Xavitar on 9/28/2008 5:55:31 PM , Rating: 2
This is why the Large Norrii Collider cannot be allowed to go online.

"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki