Print 28 comment(s) - last by Mojo the Monke.. on Sep 26 at 5:36 PM

Obama leads McCain in utilizing web technology

With roughly seven weeks left in the race to determine the next President of the United States, the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan "think tank", has conducted an analysis comparing how well the Obama and McCain camps are using website technology for organizing, fund-raising, networking, and announcing news. The Pew Research Center is a group that provides information on the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world.

Both campaigns’ official websites and are more advanced than anything seen in past elections. For much of the campaign, Obama has had the edge taking advantage of new technology, but the McCain camp has begun to close the gap by adding new features and content to their website such as social networking components. For the week ending August 30 the Obama website attracted 72% of the visits compared to 28% for McCain according to Hitwise, an internet usage research company. The study examined the Obama and McCain websites in August and again in September, before and after the national conventions.

According to the study several interesting points became apparent. The study found on the Barack Obama website it is easier for supporters to initiate grass roots activities. They can receive up-to-the-minute campaign news, pick up talking points, download campaign posters and flyers, make computer-assisted phone calls to undecided voters in swing states, and map out door-to-door canvassing operations in their area.

Both web sites offer ways of encouraging user involvement by allowing people to communicate with the campaign, and personalize their own pages. Until recently, many of these features were not operational on the McCain site while they have been active on the Obama site for the past several months. The Obama website has a customizable page called, “MyBarackObama” or “MyBO,” that closely resembles a Facebook page. They can post a profile, write a personal blog and link to their favorite Obama-related groups or individuals in their “network” of fellow Obama supporters. The McCain Web site offers customizable tools through “McCainSpace,” that allows you to create a personal page.

The Obama website links directly to 15 social networking websites. McCain’s web site does not link to any social networking sites on its home page but maintains a presence on six: MySpace, Facebook, YouTube, Digg, Flickr and LinkedIn. Even after the enhancements to McCain's site, Obama has more MySpace friends by a nearly 6-to-1 margin, more Facebook supporters by more than a 5-to-1 margin, and twice as many videos posted to his official YouTube channel.

As a general theme Obama's site links to mainstream media news stories about his candidacy more frequently than McCain's, which tends to rely on campaign-generated press releases. In August, an analysis of content found within the News section of each website revealed about 40% of the news posts on the McCain site were their own press releases versus just 12% on the Obama news page. This trend has declined as the McCain site has begun linking to news stories about Palin.

The McCain website has fully integrated his vice presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, very prominently into the website's home page. After the GOP convention, of the 17 pictures on the home page, nine featured Palin, and the two largest and most prominent photographs on the page featured Palin and McCain together. The Obama campaign incorporated Joe Biden into the Web site, but only to limited degree. The website has added biographies of Biden and his wife Jill. One interesting point the article mentions is that the Obama website in general avoids criticizing or mentioning Sarah Palin.

To further analyze the two websites the Pew Research Center reviewed the text of the most universal and permanent sections of the site candidate biographies, issues and speeches. This was done to try and determine what message the two candidates are attempting to project online. In general, they found that Obama tends to stress domestic policy and the economy, while McCain focuses broadly on national security and his experience in the military and government.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: “MyBO"
By JuliusXXII on 9/21/2008 8:22:25 AM , Rating: -1
We know that Jehovah God in the Bible , in the comandments said: "DO NOT KILL" who is the entity that said "lets have another war..That entity is Satan the Devil the god of the politicians specially the Republicans who creates war in the world so they can make more profits with the money they have invested in the weapons industry(airplanes, tanks, submarines, bullets, bombs, etc,etc) But soon Jesus Christ is coming to Judge the world, specially the weaked people like republicans, the lovers of money,,,yes " Money is their God" Wait a little bit and bad politicians will be eliminated for ever, Paradise is coming back again. JuliusXXII

RE: “MyBO"
By amanojaku on 9/21/2008 1:01:31 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe I'm off, but that was a personal hygiene joke and not an invitation for an illogical rant. No offense meant to the religious, just the ridiculous.

RE: “MyBO"
By phxfreddy on 9/21/2008 2:00:21 PM , Rating: 3
Silly liberal atheists go all religious on us when it suits their purposes.

Its people like this guy that makes you want to chain snort meth and drive a Nazi Tiger Tank on a killing spree whilst shouting Heil Hitler. I'm not a mean person so can I just limit my spree to running over their Yugo with my tank?

This would not in affirmation of Hitler but in effort to annoy them 10% of what they annoy the rest of us! After all every time you debate them it always degrades to the liberals saying

You are worse than Hitler!

These people would be well advised to remember what NAZI stood for:


And Democrat is just another word for socialist / communist.

In reality the only reason why they oppose the war in Iraq is because they see a chance to grab power. If they indeed had ethics they would be republicans or better yet liberatarians. But they're not so cut the scat. Its totally square and totally boring.

RE: “MyBO"
By Yossarian22 on 9/21/08, Rating: -1
RE: “MyBO"
By GaryJohnson on 9/22/2008 12:15:52 AM , Rating: 1
Come on people, don't feed the trolls. Vote em down and keep movin.

RE: “MyBO"
By 16nm on 9/22/2008 11:23:08 PM , Rating: 3
That you were rated as +4 shows how mind numbingly stupid the Dailytech voters is.

Is you be voting, too? :)

RE: “MyBO"
By fibreoptik on 9/22/2008 12:05:34 PM , Rating: 1
Republican retards can uprate this post as much as they want. It will not change the fact that your post/point of view isn't worth the 15 seconds it took to read (and 30 minutes it probably took you to write).

RE: “MyBO"
By Ringold on 9/21/2008 3:15:59 PM , Rating: 3
"specially the Republicans," eh?

Who got us, and kept us, in 'Nam again? Kennedy & Johnson, two Democrats.

What about Korea? Truman, another Democrat.

Who campaigned that no American boy would die on foreign soil, then began immediate preparation for WW2? Roosevelt, Democrat.

Who did the same, then volunteered us for WW1? Wilson. Guess what? Another Democrat.

But who was the first to warn against the rising influence of the military-industrial complex? Eisenhower, Republican.

We have these things called "history books." Are you familiar with them?

RE: “MyBO"
By lompocus on 9/21/2008 5:56:02 PM , Rating: 2
Hahaha, I think you must mean "Wikipedia", because history marks Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, and Roosevelt, and Wilson among the best presidents. If not, then at least Truman, Kennedy, and Roosevelt have helped you not be a nazi or commie in this modern world.

History remembers Eisenhower as buttraping the military, the economy, and america in general.

RE: “MyBO"
By gunzac21 on 9/21/2008 9:31:58 PM , Rating: 2
In fact if not for the democrats the US would not be the most powerful country in the world. Thank you Wilson and FDR.

RE: “MyBO"
By killerroach on 9/22/2008 10:27:24 AM , Rating: 2
Somewhere, Milton Friedman is rolling in his grave at the thought of this.

RE: “MyBO"
By Quiescent on 9/21/2008 11:55:53 PM , Rating: 2
We did this as last resort. Maybe you should really pay attention to your history and not leave out those important parts.

Who campaigned that no American boy would die on foreign soil, then began immediate preparation for WW2? Roosevelt, Democrat.

He absolutely did not want to meddle in foreign affairs. But after pearl harbor, that was the last straw for him. He put us in war, because if we didn't go to war, then Germany would have conquered all of the east side of earth, and then who will US have to be on their side? Germany would defeat us, and we might as well not exist as we are today.

RE: “MyBO"
By Ringold on 9/22/2008 9:16:41 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, hilarity!

Maybe you should really pay attention to your history and not leave out those important parts.

Followed by..

But after pearl harbor, that was the last straw for him.

I'm not sure you're aware of the time line leading in to WW2 and the preparations we took long before, despite accusing me of ignorance myself. There are a number of rather important actions we took that you happen to be leaving out yourself; selective memory? Pearl Harbor was pretext, the excuse we were waiting for, and an excellent one it was! But we were in the war long before Pearl Harbor. Beyond that, I can't find a link to the letter but Roosevelt wrote I believe to his son admitting later that the campaign promise was in fact a lie, but a lie he told on the belief that he'd never get elected telling the truth.

To everyone who appeared to construe my position as being opposed to all those wars, that wouldn't be accurate. Some were clearly necessary. FDR didn't have to become America's second tyrant in terms of incredible power (the first was Lincoln), but he got the job done, and Truman's blundering about in Korea at least freed half the peninsula. Good enough. As for Truman, who one person included on the list of greatest Presidents.. the parallels between Iraq and Korea are interesting. Truman was despised at the time, Bush is despised now. Truman was thought to of screwed up the war once we were there; same with Bush. Then later generations look back and recognized that Truman got a bad rap. I contend that with a democracy surrounded by theocracies in the Middle East, Bush may get a little credit at some point down the line as well, especially with so few killed compared Kennedy and Johnson's efforts in Vietnam. Oh, and how about that Kosovo/Serbia deal? They attacked us no more than Iraq, but we bombed them all the same.

The point was that all the major wars, and the vast majority of the body bags, over the last hundred years has been done by Democrats, where apparently it's the Republican's who are the great war hawks according to who I was responding to. Good job to all for missing the point.

RE: “MyBO"
By illuvatar81 on 9/23/2008 3:50:05 PM , Rating: 1
The Bible tells us that we are to be subject to the powers and principalities over us because God is in control of them, they rise and fall at God's will, not against it.

Do not make qoutations you do not truly understand.

The Bible never says do not kill either. The hebrew that the Old Testament was written in says not to "murder" to unjustly take life. It wholly endorses killing those that are chosen to be vessels of the wrath of God.

Jesus is the world's saviour, let us remember that, he came so that all men may have everlasting life, that whosoever believes in him shall not perish.

The republican party is the only party that does not wholly endorse the MURDER of unborn children, so i would not be so quick to Judge them yourself. It is the Democratic party that endorses and is happy to have the taxpayers fund abortions in this country.

RE: “MyBO"
By dluther on 9/25/2008 8:17:29 AM , Rating: 2
The republican party is the only party that does not wholly endorse the MURDER of unborn children

It's really a matter of economy of scale. The Republicans are opposed to the retail murder of unborn children (abortion), but have no qualms about government co-opted murder in the form of unjust capital punishment, or wholesale slaughter in the form of bombing a wedding party, small town, little village...

And when caught, the reply usually boils down to "oops, my bad."

Or to quote Galileo, "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."

RE: “MyBO"
By murphyslabrat on 9/26/2008 3:46:51 PM , Rating: 2
It wholly endorses killing those that are chosen to be vessels of the wrath of God.

but have no qualms about government co-opted murder in the form of unjust capital punishment,

The question that is raised, is who decides which death is just? If the position is open, I would like to get an application in.

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki