backtop


Print 67 comment(s) - last by paul1149.. on Sep 14 at 8:50 PM


A natural oil seep in Ventura County, CA
California environmental group advocates drilling to reduce oil pollution on local beaches

In 1969, a Union Oil rig off the coast of Santa Barbara experienced a blowout. Pipes burst, and oil spilled into the sea -- as much as 100,000 barrels worth. The resultant oil slick so horrified local residents that Earth Day was born.  Soon thereafter, the first of a series of laws banning offshore drilling was enacted.

The chance of another spill, locals reasoned, just wasn't worth drilling. And despite four decades of progress in eliminating such accidents, the ban has stood. Yet, local beaches still see oil slicks and its resultant damage. Where's the oil coming from?

Seeps.

A seep occurs when oil escapes naturally from the ground, due to pressure in the underground reservoir.  Off the California coast, seeps release an incredibly large amount of oil. In fact, since the 1969 accident, the amount of such seepage in the Santa Barbara Channel alone has been over 30 times as large as the amount from the spill itself. 

We can't stop such seeps, but we can reduce them. How? By drilling.

Earlier this year, University of California geophysics professor Bruce Luyendyk spoke to a citizens’ town hall forum at Santa Barbara. He told citizens that the oil mucking up Santa Barbara beaches was due to seeps, not spills. According to Luyendyk, the amount of oil escaping naturally from just one set of seeps in the Santa Barbara channel is equal to about 42 thousand gallons a day -- equal to an Exxon Valdez-size oil spill every 5 or 6 years.

Oil isn't the only thing seeping either. About 3 million cubic feet of natural gas escape each day from the ocean floor off the California Coast. By comparison, your average home uses between 200 and 300 cubic feet per day.

This is oil and gas we could be capturing and using. Instead, it's going to waste and polluting beaches in the process.

The sheer size of the seepage has led to the formation of a new environmental group, called SOS California -- which stands for Stop Oil Seeps. The group wants to lift the offshore drilling ban not to generate oil, but to reduce oil pollution from seepage. They point to university studies which demonstrate that extracting oil through drilling reduces reservoir pressure. That, in turn, reduces seepage. SOS advocates lifting the drilling ban for just that reason -- to reduce oil pollution on local beaches.

The Outer Continental Shelf is rich in oil. According to the US DOE, areas now off limits to drilling hold around 18 billion barrels. Other estimates are higher. Alaska's ANWR holds an additional 10 billion barrels. Together, that's enough to cut our foreign oil imports by 20% for the next 32 years, and generate $3.5 trillion in revenue. That's trillion, with a "T".

Polls show overwhelming support among Americans to lift the drilling ban. But is Washington listening? At the Democratic convention this week in Denver, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stopped to tell a group protesting the drilling ban, "can we drill your heads"? At the national level, the message doesn't seem to be getting through.

The Santa Barbara City Council recently voted to lift their local ban on drilling, a largely symbolic act since state and federal laws still prohibit it.   It's a start.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Bias
By TheDoc9 on 8/29/2008 12:29:06 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stopped to tell a group protesting the drilling ban, "can we drill your heads"? At the national level, the message doesn't seem to be getting through.


And we let someone like this be the speaker of the house. Can you believe it. What kind of person says something like this. She strikes me as an elitist ego maniac, this person holds a public government job, not a prestigious position on a reality show.

I guess they're just giving the job away to anyone.




RE: Bias
By kattanna on 8/29/2008 1:02:13 PM , Rating: 1
i disagree. its about time we stop coddling every little protest group.

yes.. you have the right to voice your opinion, but that doesnt make you right, nor does it mean we have to listen.


RE: Bias
By sigilscience on 8/29/2008 1:13:47 PM , Rating: 5
The difference is THIS protest group is right. The country depends on oil. Refusing to produce it is crippling our economy, and enriching our enemies.


RE: Bias
By Polynikes on 8/29/2008 3:04:14 PM , Rating: 4
Wow, that comment she made shows so much class. I'm glad we have such polite, open-minded people running our government.


RE: Bias
By FITCamaro on 8/29/2008 5:57:44 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
She strikes me as an elitist ego maniac


It's not that she strikes you as one. She IS one. Nancy "Stretch" Pelosi doesn't care what the American public think. She and her friends think they know what's best for us. They tell us to "go green to save the planet". Then go to Denver where they have a massive convention using tons of power and think that we're supposed to be fooled into it being green because they used biodegradable key cards and served organic foods. And to get and leave there they flew in their own private jets and drove around in limos and SUVs.

Same with Obama. He tells us that "We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK". But he can fly around in a private jet for the campaign trail. And be chauffeured around in multiple "evil gas guzzlers".

And the American people did not elect Pelosi as the Speaker of the House. The Democratic party did. Same with Reid. We don't select that.

Isn't it scary that if Bush and Cheney had been assassinated that that woman would have become the President?


RE: Bias
By Polynikes on 9/1/2008 2:36:52 PM , Rating: 2
Insanely scary. Here's hoping she doesn't try to succeed where Hillary failed.


RE: Bias
By FITCamaro on 9/1/2008 4:51:58 PM , Rating: 2
Heh. That's why Obama didn't pick Hillary as his VP. She'd off him 6 months into office.


RE: Bias
By Jim28 on 9/3/2008 10:55:41 AM , Rating: 2
I hate to say it but she would be a better president then Obama. Having to choose between obama and hillary, I would choose hillary. (It really pains me to say that though.)


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki