backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by joex444.. on Aug 24 at 8:50 AM

ISP unveils changes with its new "fair share" program

Details on the successor to Comcast’s policy of “data discrimination” have emerged, and the majority of its changes will affect the ISP’s most gratuitous users.

Rather than targeting a specific protocol like BitTorrent – a policy that riled up technologists and the FCC, despite its “surgical” precision in managing consumption – Comcast’s new form of network management will kick in when it identifies a single user “disproportionately” consuming network resources, and will move to throttle their connection for a short while.

“If in fact a person is generating enough packets that they're the ones creating that situation, we will manage that consumer for the overall good of all of our consumers,”' said Comcast senior vice president and general manager of online services Matt Bowling.

Comcast says its new “fair share” system of throttling troublesome customers has so far proven to be fairly effective, particularly when the throttling stays in effect for about 10 to 20 minutes.

Once the time limit elapses, speeds revert to normal.

It doesn’t mean a throttled internet experience will be undesirable, however, as Bowling says that users experiencing limited bandwidth will still have an experience on par with “really good” DSL service.

But if a user continues a high level of consumption, “we would have to manage them again.”

It appears that Comcast customers will still enjoy an essentially unlimited bandwidth allotment; however the company says it is mulling over the possibility of charging subscribers a higher price for heavier internet use – but, it “[hasn’t] made any decisions” yet.

Anecdotal reports from users indicate that the new throttling system is already in place in some territories – and that the old policy of “data discrimination” still appears to be in effect as well.

Comcast has made no indication of the kinds of numbers that would trigger a slowdown, nor any specifics regarding the capacity available for throttled users.

Comcast, with its 14.4 million subscribers, fell into hot water last year when internet users and an AP report discovered that the company was screwing with customers’ BitTorrent activities, by essentially cutting them off as soon as a file finished downloading – a potentially toxic condition to the health of the BitTorrent network. Accusations snowballed into an FCC investigation, with both the FCC and Comcast slinging nasty words back and forth for the better part of 2008; the exchange reached its culmination earlier this month, when FCC chairman Kevin Martin officially condemned Comcast for violating the Commissions' tenets of a fair, open internet experience.

Martin also left Comcast an ultimatum, demanding that it disclose its network management practices to the public, and submit a “compliance plan” with details on what it plans to do after it disables its BitTorrent blocking, which is set to happen sometime this year. This announcement appears to satisfy the FCC’s demands.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: FUD
By mikeyD95125 on 8/21/2008 3:17:25 PM , Rating: 5
Exactly. I pay for 16Mbps of unlimited service as advertised. Because Comcast advertises this then they should be able to provide the same level of service to everyone. If they cannot provide the bandwidth I pay for and throttle me then I should get a refund for however much they throttle back my service.


RE: FUD
By soloman02 on 8/21/2008 3:32:14 PM , Rating: 3
Lucky you. We pay $65 a month for 4Mbps from Comcast. Comcast loves to rape their customers when they are the only competition in town. Comcast is so damn cheap, they have yet to dig a new trench to put our line in. Currently it is sitting on the forest floor. Whats worse, they used the coax that is meant for INDOOR use (IE it is not as weather resistant).

The reason comcast is doing this is beacuse they are too cheap to upgrade their bandwidth on the lines and substations.

Cheap SOB's...


RE: FUD
By Alexstarfire on 8/22/2008 12:58:37 PM , Rating: 2
Might as well silently steal it for personal use then.


RE: FUD
By soloman02 on 8/23/2008 1:32:48 PM , Rating: 2
I would, but Lee, NH is really rural. I have 3 neighbors around me. One has 150 acres of land and his house is a good 3 acres away. The other two have houses 1-2 acres away. So the only wireless signals I can pick up are from my router.


RE: FUD
By joex444 on 8/24/2008 8:41:01 AM , Rating: 2
Acre has units of area. You can't use it to explain distance to us.


"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki