backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by joex444.. on Aug 24 at 8:50 AM

ISP unveils changes with its new "fair share" program

Details on the successor to Comcast’s policy of “data discrimination” have emerged, and the majority of its changes will affect the ISP’s most gratuitous users.

Rather than targeting a specific protocol like BitTorrent – a policy that riled up technologists and the FCC, despite its “surgical” precision in managing consumption – Comcast’s new form of network management will kick in when it identifies a single user “disproportionately” consuming network resources, and will move to throttle their connection for a short while.

“If in fact a person is generating enough packets that they're the ones creating that situation, we will manage that consumer for the overall good of all of our consumers,”' said Comcast senior vice president and general manager of online services Matt Bowling.

Comcast says its new “fair share” system of throttling troublesome customers has so far proven to be fairly effective, particularly when the throttling stays in effect for about 10 to 20 minutes.

Once the time limit elapses, speeds revert to normal.

It doesn’t mean a throttled internet experience will be undesirable, however, as Bowling says that users experiencing limited bandwidth will still have an experience on par with “really good” DSL service.

But if a user continues a high level of consumption, “we would have to manage them again.”

It appears that Comcast customers will still enjoy an essentially unlimited bandwidth allotment; however the company says it is mulling over the possibility of charging subscribers a higher price for heavier internet use – but, it “[hasn’t] made any decisions” yet.

Anecdotal reports from users indicate that the new throttling system is already in place in some territories – and that the old policy of “data discrimination” still appears to be in effect as well.

Comcast has made no indication of the kinds of numbers that would trigger a slowdown, nor any specifics regarding the capacity available for throttled users.

Comcast, with its 14.4 million subscribers, fell into hot water last year when internet users and an AP report discovered that the company was screwing with customers’ BitTorrent activities, by essentially cutting them off as soon as a file finished downloading – a potentially toxic condition to the health of the BitTorrent network. Accusations snowballed into an FCC investigation, with both the FCC and Comcast slinging nasty words back and forth for the better part of 2008; the exchange reached its culmination earlier this month, when FCC chairman Kevin Martin officially condemned Comcast for violating the Commissions' tenets of a fair, open internet experience.

Martin also left Comcast an ultimatum, demanding that it disclose its network management practices to the public, and submit a “compliance plan” with details on what it plans to do after it disables its BitTorrent blocking, which is set to happen sometime this year. This announcement appears to satisfy the FCC’s demands.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Im all for it
By myhipsi on 8/21/2008 12:17:29 PM , Rating: 1
I would have to agree as well, but they should just do what Canadian ISPs are starting to do. It's simple and effective; Capping. I currently have a 10 mb "High Speed Extreme" connection through my ISP, Rogers, which is capped at 95 Gigs per month. If I go over, which I rarely do, I'm charged $1.50 per gig up to a maximum of $25. I'm all for this as long as I get my 10mb of bandwidth which, since the cap, has been very consistant. Also, if I want to download 10 or 20 GB in one day, I can without my connection being throttled. It's a tiered something like this:

Extreme = 10mb with 95GB/month @ 54.95 + 1.50/GB
Express = 7mb with 60GB/month @ 44.95 + 2.00/GB
Lite = 1mb with 25GB/month @ 34.95 + ?/GB
UltraLite = 500kb with 2GB/month @ 24.95 + ?/GB


RE: Im all for it
By TomCorelis on 8/21/2008 2:54:15 PM , Rating: 2
Those bandwidth limits are way too low. 95gb for one month?


RE: Im all for it
By myhipsi on 8/22/2008 8:54:14 AM , Rating: 2
Sure, you can always use more Gigs, but I'd rather that than throttling. Also, for an extra $25 charge a month, or $80.00 total, I have unlimited Gigs if I choose.


RE: Im all for it
By Icelight on 8/21/2008 4:27:34 PM , Rating: 2
Capping with per-gigabyte overage fees is one of the worst possible thing to do. North American ISPs are slowly but surely bringing us back in time because they're too damn cheap to upgrade their aging infrastructure.

North American ISPs: Bringing the world of yesterday to you. Today.


RE: Im all for it
By zolo111 on 8/21/2008 4:53:22 PM , Rating: 2
I think this's the last thing comcast want to do since alot of people who don't even know what a GB is will just switch to the lower plan with 5 or 10GB monthly. Comcast will lose $$ this way..

So instead, they charge everyone $50~$60 ( unless you wait for a good deal; as good as $24 for a year), then they start whining. But where do you draw the line though? this year the monthly cap is 150GB for example, with more people singing up for thier service ( and thier infrastructure remains the same), and more bandwith consumed; they will lower the that cap...etc


“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki