backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by joex444.. on Aug 24 at 8:50 AM

ISP unveils changes with its new "fair share" program

Details on the successor to Comcast’s policy of “data discrimination” have emerged, and the majority of its changes will affect the ISP’s most gratuitous users.

Rather than targeting a specific protocol like BitTorrent – a policy that riled up technologists and the FCC, despite its “surgical” precision in managing consumption – Comcast’s new form of network management will kick in when it identifies a single user “disproportionately” consuming network resources, and will move to throttle their connection for a short while.

“If in fact a person is generating enough packets that they're the ones creating that situation, we will manage that consumer for the overall good of all of our consumers,”' said Comcast senior vice president and general manager of online services Matt Bowling.

Comcast says its new “fair share” system of throttling troublesome customers has so far proven to be fairly effective, particularly when the throttling stays in effect for about 10 to 20 minutes.

Once the time limit elapses, speeds revert to normal.

It doesn’t mean a throttled internet experience will be undesirable, however, as Bowling says that users experiencing limited bandwidth will still have an experience on par with “really good” DSL service.

But if a user continues a high level of consumption, “we would have to manage them again.”

It appears that Comcast customers will still enjoy an essentially unlimited bandwidth allotment; however the company says it is mulling over the possibility of charging subscribers a higher price for heavier internet use – but, it “[hasn’t] made any decisions” yet.

Anecdotal reports from users indicate that the new throttling system is already in place in some territories – and that the old policy of “data discrimination” still appears to be in effect as well.

Comcast has made no indication of the kinds of numbers that would trigger a slowdown, nor any specifics regarding the capacity available for throttled users.

Comcast, with its 14.4 million subscribers, fell into hot water last year when internet users and an AP report discovered that the company was screwing with customers’ BitTorrent activities, by essentially cutting them off as soon as a file finished downloading – a potentially toxic condition to the health of the BitTorrent network. Accusations snowballed into an FCC investigation, with both the FCC and Comcast slinging nasty words back and forth for the better part of 2008; the exchange reached its culmination earlier this month, when FCC chairman Kevin Martin officially condemned Comcast for violating the Commissions' tenets of a fair, open internet experience.

Martin also left Comcast an ultimatum, demanding that it disclose its network management practices to the public, and submit a “compliance plan” with details on what it plans to do after it disables its BitTorrent blocking, which is set to happen sometime this year. This announcement appears to satisfy the FCC’s demands.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Im all for it
By SocrPlyr on 8/21/2008 10:19:59 AM , Rating: 2
This isn't just a cable problem for comcasts. This shows up all over the place on the internet. The issue is that the protocols treat all TCP connections as if they were coming from different computers. Peer to peer protocols game the system by creating lots of TCP connections and thus are able to take up a larger fraction of the bandwidth available, which does happen to show up more on the bandwidth limited cable plants. DSL providers have the same problem as well, but it shows up between the CO and the rest of the web. It is easier to get more capacity in the few areas needed by the phone company than it is on the cable plant.


RE: Im all for it
By DM0407 on 8/21/2008 10:56:47 AM , Rating: 5
They shouldn't offer 5/15Mbps if they can't provide it at all times. That's false advertising...

You would be pretty pissed if you bought car that says it gets 35mpg only to find out that if you got over 50 miles a day the mileage drops to 15mpg. (and dont give me the "if drive 100mph your mileage would drop" analogy, its not relevant)

Cable companies have limited competition so they don't need to take care of their customers. I for one cannot wait for Fios to get in my area, at least Verizon is spending the capital to build a decent infrastructure.

Also, how is this at all transparent to the customer? Where does it say what the cutoff limit is? What happens if someone is teleconferencing? Will they just get a choppy connection for 15min?


RE: Im all for it
By koenshaku on 8/21/2008 11:56:43 AM , Rating: 5
I agree, that is false advertisement and it just changed my decision to go switch AT&T DSL though I hate AT&T getting porn downloads capped is an unbearable thought... No seriously Comcast download rates I thought were always too inconsistent now that they're doing stuff like this I can now see why... AT&T are lying fiber in my area and I think they're offering a 12mbps download rates at competitive prices.


RE: Im all for it
By dgingeri on 8/21/2008 12:22:07 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
by DM0407 on August 21, 2008 at 10:56 AM

They shouldn't offer 5/15Mbps if they can't provide it at all times. That's false advertising...


They don't advertise it that way. In every single ISP add I've ever seen, it's been advertised as "Up to" such and such.


"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki