Print 48 comment(s) - last by xphile.. on Aug 21 at 7:23 AM

Intel spreads USB 3.0 love to everyone

Intel finally announced the availability of the draft specification for the USB 3.0 host controller. Intel dubbed the specification the Extensible Host Controller Interface (xHCI). The USB 3.0 architecture is also known as SuperSpeed USB.

Intel says that the xHCI draft 0.9 -- which it has made available under royalty free licensing terms to all USB 3.0 Promoter Group and contributor companies -- provides a standardized method for the host controller to communicate with the USB 3.0 software stack.

Intel says the specification describes the registers and data structures needed to provide the interface between system software and USB 3.0 hardware. Intel also says that it plans to make available a revised xHCI 0.95 specification in the fourth quarter of 2008. The revised specification will also be subject to the licensing terms of the original .90 specification and will be distributed free of charge.

Along with the announcement that the open host controller for the USB 3.0 specification is now available, Intel also has some major manufacturers and software companies backing its open host specification for USB 3.0 -- including Dell, Microsoft, NEC Electronics, and AMD.

AMD's Phil Eisler, vice president and general manager of the Chipset Business Unit, said in a statement, "The future of computing and consumer devices is increasingly visual and bandwidth intensive. Lifestyles filled with HD media and digital audio demand quick and universal data transfer. USB 3.0 is an answer to the future bandwidth need of the PC platform. AMD believes strongly in open industry standards, and therefore is supporting a common xHCI specification."

Eisler's statement may be confusing to some who remember back in June when AMD and NVIDIA accused Intel of withholding the USB 3.0 specifications. AMD, NVIDIA, VIA, and SIS all announced in June that they would team up to devise their own USB 3.0 host controller specification. Now AMD is saying that it will fully support Intel's xHCI specification.

That leaves many wondering exactly where NVIDIA stands with its competing specification, which would seem to be dead at this point. When you combine AMD support for Intel's xHCI specification with the fact that VIA announced this month that it was leaving the chipset business altogether, it could reasonably be expected that NVIDIA would jump on Intel bandwagon as well.

Back in June, when AMD and NVIDIA accused Intel of withholding the specification, Intel fiercely denied the claim. Intel maintained at the time that the USB 3.0 specification simply wasn't ready to be released. However, there is no doubt that insiders at Intel were privy to the specification before it was released the other chipset and hardware manufacturers. That would mean that Intel should have a lead to market for USB 3.0 chipsets and hardware.

AMD is not the only manufacturer throwing their support behind Intel's xHCI specification. Microsoft says that it has supported drivers for the USB industry since the inception of USB and is committed to support the latest USB 3.0 specification on the Windows platform. NEC electronics promises to be a leader in the USB 3.0 market using products and solutions based on Intel's xHCI specification.

The USB 3.0 specification promises to increase performance by 10 times what USB 2.0 is capable of. USB 3.0 or SuperSpeed USB promises bandwidth in the 600 MB/s second range. Products utilizing USB 3.0 are expected to arrive in 2009 or 2010. USB 3.0 is also backwards compatible with USB 2.0 and USB 1.1.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By DASQ on 8/14/2008 1:28:17 PM , Rating: -1
How exactly is this seen as 'jumping on Intel's bandwagon'?

Intel caved in and released the specification of USB3.0 after their competitors threatened to introduce their own interface.

RE: Uhh...
By DASQ on 8/14/08, Rating: -1
RE: Uhh...
By rdeegvainl on 8/14/2008 2:32:45 PM , Rating: 3
So would it not follow, since the comment was no longer relevant that it also would not be worth reading? Would it then not follow suit that people click the button saying not worth reading?

RE: Uhh...
By mindless1 on 8/14/2008 3:05:00 PM , Rating: 3
Indeed, but really if someone is so uptight about what rating a post gets, they're in the wrong place because anyone who has a strong opinion about things is going to get downrated every now and then.

RE: Uhh...
By Diesel Donkey on 8/14/2008 8:14:05 PM , Rating: 2
I would argue that a comment should not be rated down just because the title to which it referred was later changed by the editor. I do agree, however, that the poster's response was a little over the top.

RE: Uhh...
By vapore0n on 8/14/2008 2:33:14 PM , Rating: 1
I was wondering why Sony had not released their own version of USB.v3

RE: Uhh...
By foxtrot9 on 8/14/2008 2:38:14 PM , Rating: 2
Oh they will, just give them time

RE: Uhh...
By mindless1 on 8/14/2008 3:07:04 PM , Rating: 3
... still waiting for someone to make a proprietary incompatible USB controller with a rootkit built in.

"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki