Print 84 comment(s) - last by PitViper007.. on Aug 14 at 3:30 PM

Intel's logo for its main line of "i7" Nehalem processors will be blue.

Intel's logo for the "Extreme" edition of the i7 brand will be black.
Intel's "baby" -- its new eight-core chips based on the new Nehalem architecture -- have been named and are almost ready to launch

The impending launch of Intel's Nehalem processor in Q4 2008 already has the hardware community buzzing.  Nehalem has already shaped up to appear quite the performance beast.  With the power of eight logical cores (four physical, doubled by hyper-threading) built on a 45 nm process to leverage, it’s shaping up to be a strong offering. 

The new processor will feature QuickPath, Intel's answer to AMD's HyperTransport, an on-chip memory controller, SSE4 instruction support, and an 8 MB cache pool.  Chips have already been demoed running at 3.2 GHz, so early indications are that Intel has had relatively little process problems.

Now Intel has made an important move towards the eventual release of Nehalem by giving it its official brand name.  The processor will be branded "Intel Core" with an "i7" identifier for the first round of chips.  This brand will include an Extreme Edition at launch according to Intel.  It is also expected to launch to both the desktop and server markets, though the server line may come slightly later than the desktop lineup.  Intel is also cooking up mobile versions of the processor. 

In months following the launch, other products with different identifiers will be announced according to Intel.  Intel says that its focus with the line is to both up the performance over its previous successful dual and quad core offerings.  At the same time it hopes to cut the power usage significantly.

Sean Maloney, Intel Corporation executive vice president and general manager, Sales and Marketing Group says that focusing on the "i7" line is Intel's top priority.  He states, "The Core name is and will be our flagship PC processor brand going forward.  Expect Intel to focus even more marketing resources around that name and the Core i7 products starting now."

Intel will maintain a numbered system similar to its past "Intel Core" offerings to differentiate individual processor models.

Another significant advance for Intel is that all the chip's cores will be on a single piece of silicon.  AMD has been using this method for quite some time, but Intel declined in order to improve yields.  The chip will face off against AMD's upcoming Shanghai processor.

Meanwhile, the Penryn platform, while passing the torch to Nehalem will see a bit of new life of its own, thanks to the Dunnington platform which will place 3 dies for a total of 6 cores in a chip package and target the server market. 

AMD plans to release a six-core version of Shanghai to combat this beast.  A 12-core dual-die package version of Shanghai is thought to be in the works, and Intel is likely considering either a dual-die Nehalem with eight cores or consolidating Dunnington to a single die and releasing a dual-die variant with 12 cores to combat this.

Intel is also focusing significant attention to its upcoming line of discrete graphics processors, code-named Larrabee.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Hey Jason?
By GhandiInstinct on 8/11/2008 11:53:08 AM , Rating: 2
Any idea when the 8core 16 virtual version will come out?

Do you even recommend 8 cores given we barely have any software that supports 4 now?

Prices etc??

RE: Hey Jason?
By surt on 8/11/2008 12:11:26 PM , Rating: 2
You would want 8 cores only if you know you have software to use them. Otherwise, you'll probably just cost yourself money with wasted power. Lots of enterprise users are ready to use 8 cores, but home users, not so much, unless you're heavily into movie editing or 3d work.

RE: Hey Jason?
By GhandiInstinct on 8/11/2008 1:15:02 PM , Rating: 2
Will 8 cores be better for games or premiere pro rendering?

RE: Hey Jason?
By HsiKai on 8/11/2008 1:50:32 PM , Rating: 2
Only if they are programmed to take advantage of multiple threads. In general it is said that no, it doesn't help, but if you have any background programs at all, it can't hurt to have another core or three for background tasks/anti-virus/SETI/Folding/etc.

RE: Hey Jason?
By Clauzii on 8/11/2008 2:28:49 PM , Rating: 2
Premiere Pro, Photoshop, Cubase and programs that support multiple cores will definately gain from 8 cores. And a few games at the moment (counts on one hand?). Most people will have plenty of power with 2, 3 or 4 cores, for now.

The greatest advantage, I think, is that with more cores the clock speed for each core can be lowered while maintaing computational power overall, and at the same time using less power.

RE: Hey Jason?
By Alpha4 on 8/11/2008 5:57:16 PM , Rating: 2
Conversely anything not optimzed for multiple threads might suffer as more densly packed dies (dice?) might yield lower clockspeed overhead, particularly when it comes to overclocking. However moving to a 32nm process for the octuple core Nehalem should negate that problem.

RE: Hey Jason?
By HsiKai on 8/11/2008 6:47:43 PM , Rating: 2
Not only moving to a smaller, more efficient process, but getting rid of the FSB should be very good, too.

With regards to you statement about more cores equating to lower clockspeed, that's not been particularly true with respect to Intel's offerings since Core 2. Also, keep in mind the increasingly more efficient instruction sets used with each tick (or tock?). Clock for clock there should be significant improvement between each tick or tock, but it's up to Intel as to the quality of the silicon and how overclockable the chips will be. After the market popularity of the Core 2 I would assume they are not going to spite the enthusiast market by dumbing down the ability to OC.

"Dies" is the correct plural of "die" with respect to machined parts that are stamped (with a die). A "die" can also be the singular of the cube you roll, whereas the plural of that would be "dice." And to add more confusion to the fun, "die" is also an alternate spelling of "dye."

RE: Hey Jason?
By Comdrpopnfresh on 8/12/2008 3:46:09 AM , Rating: 2
I can't wait to see Nehalem vs Shanghai in all-around benchmarks. Nehalem should be quite the multitasking beast, but rumors abound about how Shanghai's module architecture will allow it to perform, what in layman's terms is known as, reverse hyper-threading. It should alleviate multitasking issues, as well as bring a return performance in single-threaded environments. A lot of people say this is what AMD was talking about when they said Shanghai will bring about a new understanding for computing especially with things people didn't think could be done on hardware before.

Unless they're talking about a 300watt processor who's stock fan has a toast slot, it would seem to be threading. It seems performance can only be had nowadays when software is efficiently run to optimize use of multicore processors. If hardware could be used to run standard programming faster, as well as instances where people try to run a few of those standard programs at once- it would be along the lines of what was said...

No one seems to remember how dual-core sucked when it came out. Benchmarks didn't favor it, tdp's didn't favor it, it was only noticeable when people did inhuman levels of multitasking (aka leave needless crap running in background). It wasn't until benchmarks and game demos began over-incorporating dual-core optimized code that was unrepresentative of the consumer market software at the time. Same thing is happening with quad now. It's a shame people are buying pc's at bestbuy w/ quad cores, thinking they'll be faster at this and that. Yeh little timmy has school work to do on the computer regularly, but little timmy doesn't have to encode hi-def movies for his 4th grade english homework.

Unless you use VM, build a server, or we miraculously are delivered a set of stone tablets from a tall mountain and programmers instantly begin writing multi-core optimized code (none of this dual, or quad, but scalable no matter how many) over night, an 8-core HT processor is kinda like having a Ferrari when gas is 5 dollars...

Late september to october at the earliest. Don't expect much below $400 initially. Think along the lines of when core2 was released. First thing is gonna be a 1000-1100 dollar extreme part, a few server processors, and 3-5 mainstream. Prolly looking at a 3.2ghz max release, a 2.8-3.0 variant, 2.4-2.6 variant, 2.2-2.4, 2-2.2. Laptop chips won't follow for another quarter or two- ddr3 prices need to come down. The adoption for i7 will either be slow or really quick. Many xeons used are socket compatible with 775 core2s, so if i7 is to replace xeon in the server market, conroe/penryn needs to dry up. Otherwise, i7 will cut into intel's itanium, and s-771 sales- which offer higher margins.
The success of both AMD and Intel architectures is also contingent on a new Windows OS. One with features and all-around performance everyone will want, not just an aesthetic upgrade- but better hardware to deliver it all. This'll mainly be a concern on the 32nm node.

"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki