Print 45 comment(s) - last by Nik00117.. on Aug 10 at 3:41 AM

2010 Infiniti G37 Hybrid Sedan  (Source: AutoblogGreen)

Nissan EV-02  (Source: AutoblogGreen)
Nissan hybrid vehicle prototype uses rear-wheel drive

Nissan pulled the wraps off a pair of prototype vehicles today – one is an all-electric and one a hybrid. Both of the vehicles take advantage of new lithium-ion batteries that Nissan and NEC jointly developed. The two vehicles were developed under the NISSAN GT 2012 business plan.

The advanced lithium-ion batteries used in the prototype vehicles feature a compact, laminated configuration that delivers twice the electrical power when compared to traditional cylindrical configurations. Nissan says that the compact design of the batteries allows for improved vehicle packaging and a wider range of applications when compared to traditional batteries.

The full electric vehicle uses the advanced batteries along with a newly developed 80kW motor and inverter. Nissan says the electric vehicle uses a front-wheel drive configuration and that the advanced laminated batteries are installed under the floor of the vehicle. The laminated design of the batteries means that the vehicles interior and storage space are not sacrificed to battery storage. Nissan says that the full electric vehicle will go into production in 2010 and will feature a new and unique body style not based on existing Nissan vehicles.

Nissan's prototype hybrid electric vehicle introduces a pair of new technologies Nissan says are breakthroughs -- a high-performance rear-wheel drive system and a parallel-powertrain hybrid system. Nissan says that both the hybrid technology and the rear-wheel drive are original designs -- in this case, the system is placed within a 2010 Infiniti G37 Sedan.

Nissan's parallel-powertrain system connects one motor directly to an engine and transmission via two clutches. This layout allows the vehicle to switch between the dual clutches to optimize and conserve energy utilization and improve fuel-efficiency. Nissan says its parallel-powertrain eliminates the need for typical torque converters and contributes to higher responsiveness and linear acceleration.

Nissan describes the action of the hybrid system as:

  • Idle-stop: The battery is used to power the motor to save on fuel.
  • Regular driving: The engine is used to power the motor as well as regenerate the battery.
  • Acceleration: Both the engine and battery (power assist) is used to power the motor to achieve smooth acceleration.
  • Deceleration: Energy from braking is conserved and re-routed back to regenerate the battery.

Nissan isn’t alone in introducing new hybrid vehicles. Yesterday DailyTech reported that Honda was bringing the Insight back to the U.S. as a 2010 model for an MSRP of $18,500. The Insight is rumored to get over 70 miles per gallon.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

One question I have
By Moishe on 8/6/2008 4:23:09 PM , Rating: 5
Nowhere in the article does it mention estimated MPG... I would think any hybrid article would have that information.

Still, Nissan is a good company and I'm glad they're getting into this game. It sounds like it will be a decent vehicle.

RE: One question I have
By RaisedinUS on 8/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: One question I have
By an0dize on 8/6/2008 4:28:20 PM , Rating: 2
The Insight is made by Honda. It is an entirely different automobile manufacturer.

RE: One question I have
By Brandon Hill on 8/6/2008 4:28:51 PM , Rating: 2
That's a Honda referenced from a few days ago. The two Nissan models are prototypes and no information has been released yet on MPG or range.

RE: One question I have
By icrf on 8/6/2008 4:35:16 PM , Rating: 1
I'm sure it'll be a fun car to drive, but it'll be pricey, and I'd be surprised if it reached 30-35 mpg. I'm still relatively convinced that fun + efficient = turbo.

RE: One question I have
By Treckin on 8/7/08, Rating: -1
RE: One question I have
By solah13 on 8/7/2008 9:35:18 AM , Rating: 3
So algebraically

efficient = turbo - fun
fun = turbo - efficient

Sounds about right.

RE: One question I have
By TimberJon on 8/6/2008 5:02:31 PM , Rating: 2
I love Nissans, if they're 3rd Generation Maximas..

5th Gen and up have been nothing but problems and bad design, engineering and material quality. The new 2009 maxima 4DSC might change that... finally.. but has yet to be verified.

RE: One question I have
By 67STANG on 8/6/2008 5:55:52 PM , Rating: 2
I hear ya. I had a 2006 Sentra SER SpecV. The car would turn like nobody's business, and was alright in a straight line too (except for the massive torque-steer).

Problem is, the 2.5 engine eats oil (apparently from using bad piston-rings) and after 20,000 miles the car started having difficulty starting when warm.

Found out later that EVERY person I know that had a 2.5 engine (didn't matter if it was in a Sentra or an Altima) had the same problem... Probably wouldn't buy a Nissan any time soon...

RE: One question I have
By Spuke on 8/6/2008 6:57:46 PM , Rating: 2
Mine had the same issue. I had an 04 Spec V. The 3.7L is an entirely new engine than the 3.5L. My neighbor has a G37 coupe and has experienced no problems. I have read good things about the new motor.

RE: One question I have
By AlexWade on 8/6/2008 10:04:46 PM , Rating: 3
My 350z has been problem free for 3 and 1/2 years. The only blemishes are cosmetic. Of course, I take care of my car. Still, the Nissan V6 3.5L engine is second to none in quality. Before my Z, I had a 2001 Maxima with about 70,000 miles on it. No problems whatsoever. Nissan's V4 and V8 I cannot speak for.

Although I love Nissan, I am disgusted that their new Skyline/GT-R does not have a manual transmission. That is just fundamentally wrong.

RE: One question I have
By Spuke on 8/7/2008 9:58:32 AM , Rating: 3
It DOES have a manual transmission. The clutch is controlled by electronics much like a F1 car. It's got all the manual tranny parts such as, clutches, flywheel, TO bearing, pressure plate, etc. Automatics don't have ANY of those parts. Don't be confused by the wannabe F1-style automatic trannys with paddle shifters, totally different thing as those are STILL automatic trannys.

RE: One question I have
By Oregonian2 on 8/6/2008 7:47:13 PM , Rating: 2
Why put out garbage numbers now only to be vilified for their inaccuracy later? It looks to be in the very prototype/test-vehicle stage.

RE: One question I have
By theapparition on 8/6/2008 9:32:41 PM , Rating: 2
Well.....that's kinda Nissan's m.o.

For example, they've claimed GT-R performance numbers for a supposedly "american tuned production car", yet testing at "The Ring" showed that they used R compond tires (not runflats) and didn't run a full lap. Initial cars handed to automotive enthusiest magazines showed incredible performance, but when those same magazined got thier hands on prodution variants, ooops, performance dropped.

Sounds like par for the course to release garbage numbers to generate hype. Surprised they didn't do it here.

RE: One question I have
By Spuke on 8/7/2008 10:04:13 AM , Rating: 2
Initial cars handed to automotive enthusiest magazines showed incredible performance,
I'm still trying to find these mystery magazines as ALL of the magazines I've read were able to reproduce the quick times. I don't see the big deal here.

RE: One question I have
By Shlong on 8/7/2008 12:51:16 PM , Rating: 2
"Initial cars handed to automotive enthusiest magazines showed incredible performance"

And after they got their hands on it, it showed incredible performance. Go look for the Stig taking it around the Top Gear track (it was faster than a lot of supercars).

RE: One question I have
By Oregonian2 on 8/7/2008 3:27:15 PM , Rating: 2
So, someone is upset that Nissan did things right?

RE: One question I have
By theapparition on 8/8/2008 10:20:11 AM , Rating: 2
Am I upset that they tested a "production" car with a non-production tune and non-production tires and passed that off as true production, you bet.

And you call that right?

RE: One question I have
By Oregonian2 on 8/8/2008 2:46:49 PM , Rating: 2
I was referring to the not-giving of performance numbers that was complained about "above" in this thread.

RE: One question I have
By Oregonian2 on 8/8/2008 2:47:46 PM , Rating: 2
Specifically to this statement:

Sounds like par for the course to release garbage numbers to generate hype. Surprised they didn't do it here.

RE: One question I have
By walk2k on 8/6/2008 9:05:28 PM , Rating: 2
Does it have to look like a shoebox?

"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki