Print 49 comment(s) - last by elgueroloco.. on Aug 11 at 11:25 PM

iRobot PackBot
Army wants 30% of force to be robotic by 2020

Science fiction fans raised on a steady diet of Terminator and Star Wars films have very specific ideas about what a robot on the battlefield would look like. The reality of military robots is that all of them require a human to operate, often with a joystick and a computer.

As far as the military is concerned, anything from an autonomous vehicle to a remote controlled observation drone could be considered a robot. The U.S. Military is using robots at an ever increasing pace for all sorts of tasks. One of the most common military robots is the iRobot PackBot. The PackBot can be configured for different uses including bomb detection. Another war robot called the SWORD can actually carry weapons into battle, though the SWORD has not been deployed yet at this time.

A pair of researchers from Washington University in St. Louis -- Doug Few and Bill Smart -- say that the military goal is to have approximately 30% of the Army comprised of robots by 2020. Smart says, "When the military says 'robot' they mean everything from self-driving trucks up to what you would conventionally think of as a robot. You would more accurately call them autonomous systems rather than robots."

The researchers and other supporters of robots in the military point out that all of the robots currently in service are teleoperated by people remotely. The reason to keep people controlling the robots rather than making the totally autonomous is so that the human operator has to make the decision and analyze the situation before shots are fired. This is to prevent any accidental shootings attributed to a robot and help eliminate the fear that robots could commit war crimes.

Smart says, "It's a chain of command thing. You don't want to give autonomy to a weapons delivery system. You want to have a human hit the button. You don't want the robot to make the wrong decision. You want to have a human to make all of the important decisions."

Few is also working on the relationship between the human operator and the robot in an attempt to make controlling the robot more natural and easy. Being able to control the robot easily and keep eyes on the environment in a war zone is paramount to operator safety.

One method Few is working on to make controlling robots more natural is integrating the Nintendo Wii motion controller into the operating system. This allows the robot to be controlled by the operator without the need for a laptop or screen and allows the soldier to operate the robot and still watch his environment for the enemy.

Smart explains, "We forget that when we're controlling robots in the lab it's really pretty safe and no one's trying to kill us. But if you are in a war zone and you're hunched over a laptop, that's not a good place to be. You want to be able to use your eyes in one place and use your hand to control the robot without tying up all of your attention."

While viewing an iRobot PackBot destroyed in combat after defusing a bomb, Few says he came to a realization. "When I stood there and looked at that PackBot, I realized that if that robot hadn't been there, it would have been some kid," said Few. Replacing the human in some of the most dangerous tasks on the battlefield -- like defusing bombs -- is one of the best uses for military robots in many eyes.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 30% of the Army, eh?
By 325hhee on 8/5/2008 1:19:16 PM , Rating: 2
Isn't it, first to go, last to know? Army always get the credit because they're there longer, the Marines, do all the hard work and rarely gets recognize. It's the Marines that busts the doors open, make a camp, and the Army comes in and holds it indefinitely, so they're seen more to the public :(

Jarheads FTW

RE: 30% of the Army, eh?
By headbox on 8/5/2008 5:43:09 PM , Rating: 3
Let's see...

Viet Nam, first battle involved US Army Air Cav.

Grenada, first secured by 75th Rangers - US Army.

Panama, first secured by Green Berets, 82nd Airborne (Army) 75th Rangers (Army) and Navy SEALs

Gulf War 1- first attack was by 101st Airborne (Army) Apaches

Gulf War 2- Army captured Baghdad

Afghanistan- Green Berets (Army) lead assault.

Let's not forget the Army had to do the Marines job of an amphibious landing on D-Day and many of the Pacific island invasions of WW2.

Marines first in? When? LOL!

RE: 30% of the Army, eh?
By LuxFestinus on 8/6/2008 1:05:20 PM , Rating: 2
Marines first in? When? LOL!

Maybe when they are busy retreating aka advancing in another direction?

RE: 30% of the Army, eh?
By foolsgambit11 on 8/5/08, Rating: -1
RE: 30% of the Army, eh?
By Samus on 8/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: 30% of the Army, eh?
By elgueroloco on 8/11/2008 11:25:06 PM , Rating: 2
The Marines may do it the "toughest," but that's because the institutional mentality and battle planning of the Marine Corps tends to be foolhearty and results in unnecessary casualties.

The Army might construct a battle plan like this: First the Air Force bombs stuff, then we get in a little closer and maybe shell it or have the Navy hit it with Tomahawks, and then we go in and mop up what's left.

Here's a Marine battle plan: Hey diddle diddle, right up the middle. Hoorah!

Don't get me wrong. Marines are very well trained and good at what they do, as individuals. It's the Corps mentality that's all screwed up.

"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen
Related Articles
War Robots Still in Iraq
April 17, 2008, 10:20 AM
Can Robots Commit War Crimes?
February 29, 2008, 2:37 PM

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki