Print 118 comment(s) - last by Shadow Concept.. on Aug 7 at 10:45 PM

Journalists, fans, and support staff betrayed by false "open internet" pledge

A secret order to foreign-owned Chinese hotels compels them to spy on guests during the Olympic Games, according to a memo revealed Tuesday by U.S. Senator Sam Brownback.

Brownback, a republican representing Kansas, said he received a document issued by the Chinese Public Security bureau, which orders hotels to install spying equipment on their internet connections and threatens owners with “severe retaliation” – including the possibility of losing their operating licenses – should they fail to comply.

“These hotels are justifiably outraged by this order,” said Brownback at a news conference Tuesday, noting that it forces them into the “awkward position” of having to “craft pop-up messages” informing guests of their loss of privacy.

Brownback said he received a copy of the original document, translated from Chinese, from attorneys representing two different “foreign-owned” hotel chains. The companies want to remain anonymous so that they don’t face further reprisal. Several other international hotel chains confirmed the order.

An AP report said the Chinese embassy was unavailable for comment.

According to the memo, hotels were told that “all hotel rooms and offices” are considered subject to “on-site or remote technical monitoring at all times.”

With little more than a week remaining before the 2008 Summer Olympics begin in Beijing, Chinese hotel owners appear to have little choice. Despite their outrage, hotel companies are more concerned about the long-term repercussions of non-compliance – failure to obey could place an entire company’s operations in jeopardy, potentially locking them out of a lucrative, growing Chinese market.

Meanwhile, athletes and participants staying at the Olympic Village have a unique set of woes for their internet access: an IT contractor recently leaked a list of rates for DSL service charged by BOCOG (Beijing Organizing Committee of the 2008 Olympic Games), with the cheapest option being a 512/512 kilobit line available for 11,700 RMB ($1716.05 USD). 

“I just can't believe that not only do I have to deal with the Great Firewall of China, but also pay through the nose to use it!” wrote the anonymous contractor.

According to Australian newspaper The Age, the International Olympic Committee issued a formal apology Wednesday for “misleading” the world’s press about the China’s “open internet” pledge. Senior IOC member Kevan Gosper, who originally delivered the promise of “unfettered freedom to report in China,” said he was unaware of the apparently backroom negotiations with Chinese censors, which will keep a number of “sensitive sites” blocked from access.

Age reporters said they were unable to access a number of sites involving human rights discussions, Tibet, and the Falun Gong, with merely intermittent access to a larger portfolio of websites including the New York Times, BBC China, al-Jazeera, Radio Free Asia, and Taiwanese newspapers.

 BOCOG spokesman Sun Weide said that China promised journalists that they would “be able to use the internet for their work during the Olympic Games. So we have given them sufficient access to do that.”

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why the outrage, we do it here too.
By GarfieldtheCat on 7/31/2008 9:00:40 AM , Rating: -1
Thanks to Bush and the telco's, this goes on every day here in the US. Remember how ATT gave the NSA the entire feed off of their network?

So why are you complaining about another country doing it, when it gets done to you by your own country (if you live int he US)?

The only difference is that the US doesn't block any websites.

RE: Why the outrage, we do it here too.
By abzillah on 7/31/2008 11:50:53 AM , Rating: 1
There is a huge difference between us and them. We know what they do, put you in jail for speaking against the government. It's not the case here, where we really don't know who's phone and internet is being tapped. The guilty ones are sent to Guantanamo or to some middle eastern country and tortured and where they are given no trial! We are much different, we don't leak our short comings to the public. :)

By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/1/2008 11:53:49 AM , Rating: 2
Guantanamo are for prisoners of war. Not US citizens. Prisoners of war do not have the same rights as US citizen. Do not confuse the two. Prisoners of war have the rights of war prisoners. We know exactly who the government has be tapping into (or trying)...any one making phone calls into terrorist suspected areas, and/or people with connection to terrorist group or people. Really not a big deal if you are a “normal” citizen of the USA....unless you are planning on supporting terrorist groups or have family living in “known” terrorist areas around the world.
The only thing I do not like about this phone tapping is – if only this one level to stop terrorist it is good, but then what will be the reason to allow the next level, then the next so on. That would be bad.

"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer

Related Articles

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki