Print 118 comment(s) - last by Shadow Concept.. on Aug 7 at 10:45 PM

Journalists, fans, and support staff betrayed by false "open internet" pledge

A secret order to foreign-owned Chinese hotels compels them to spy on guests during the Olympic Games, according to a memo revealed Tuesday by U.S. Senator Sam Brownback.

Brownback, a republican representing Kansas, said he received a document issued by the Chinese Public Security bureau, which orders hotels to install spying equipment on their internet connections and threatens owners with “severe retaliation” – including the possibility of losing their operating licenses – should they fail to comply.

“These hotels are justifiably outraged by this order,” said Brownback at a news conference Tuesday, noting that it forces them into the “awkward position” of having to “craft pop-up messages” informing guests of their loss of privacy.

Brownback said he received a copy of the original document, translated from Chinese, from attorneys representing two different “foreign-owned” hotel chains. The companies want to remain anonymous so that they don’t face further reprisal. Several other international hotel chains confirmed the order.

An AP report said the Chinese embassy was unavailable for comment.

According to the memo, hotels were told that “all hotel rooms and offices” are considered subject to “on-site or remote technical monitoring at all times.”

With little more than a week remaining before the 2008 Summer Olympics begin in Beijing, Chinese hotel owners appear to have little choice. Despite their outrage, hotel companies are more concerned about the long-term repercussions of non-compliance – failure to obey could place an entire company’s operations in jeopardy, potentially locking them out of a lucrative, growing Chinese market.

Meanwhile, athletes and participants staying at the Olympic Village have a unique set of woes for their internet access: an IT contractor recently leaked a list of rates for DSL service charged by BOCOG (Beijing Organizing Committee of the 2008 Olympic Games), with the cheapest option being a 512/512 kilobit line available for 11,700 RMB ($1716.05 USD). 

“I just can't believe that not only do I have to deal with the Great Firewall of China, but also pay through the nose to use it!” wrote the anonymous contractor.

According to Australian newspaper The Age, the International Olympic Committee issued a formal apology Wednesday for “misleading” the world’s press about the China’s “open internet” pledge. Senior IOC member Kevan Gosper, who originally delivered the promise of “unfettered freedom to report in China,” said he was unaware of the apparently backroom negotiations with Chinese censors, which will keep a number of “sensitive sites” blocked from access.

Age reporters said they were unable to access a number of sites involving human rights discussions, Tibet, and the Falun Gong, with merely intermittent access to a larger portfolio of websites including the New York Times, BBC China, al-Jazeera, Radio Free Asia, and Taiwanese newspapers.

 BOCOG spokesman Sun Weide said that China promised journalists that they would “be able to use the internet for their work during the Olympic Games. So we have given them sufficient access to do that.”

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By FITCamaro on 7/31/2008 7:57:30 AM , Rating: 2

Why would you want to go on that site?

And I'm just laughing my @$$ off with this because they've brought it on themselves. Maybe this will teach them a lesson.

RE: Ummm...
By SpaceRanger on 7/31/2008 10:00:56 AM , Rating: 2
I doubt it. If you look at the IOC's track record for how they handle themselves, they won't learn a damned thing.

RE: Ummm...
By kmmatney on 7/31/2008 1:27:05 PM , Rating: 2
post to remove an accidental rating...

RE: Ummm...
By djkrypplephite on 7/31/2008 1:30:53 PM , Rating: 2
True. Nazi Germany is also an acceptable host, so I guess China isn't so bad afterall.

RE: Ummm...
By michael67 on 7/31/2008 11:29:06 PM , Rating: 2
Why would you want to go on that site?

Why wouldn't you go to that site ???

Yes they are Arabic oriented same as US sites are US oriented but one thing i notice on al-Jazeera they have a lot more criticism about local Arabic policies then US site have about there own government.

And lots of EU/US journalist could actual learn something from them, maybe because its new to the region and journalist still believe they have to be impartial to the news they bring.

Anyway imho its just stupid to ignore a news source even if you wouldn't agree whit it it makes you understand how others think and think about you!

In my work as a supervisor/foreman I always found that listening what others say and think can help you extremely in preventing/solving problems.
Imo people have lost the ability to listen to others, because if they did they would find out that at the core they all what the same thing.

But its mouths easier to hate what you don't understand, then take the time to actual listen what others say, and try to work things out.

"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki