backtop


Print 107 comment(s) - last by glitchc.. on Aug 11 at 10:58 AM

The U.S. used to only compete with Russia, but now has multiple other nations to deal with

The U.S. is losing ground to competing space agencies as Europe, China, Russia and Japan continue to make progress in their space programs.  Even though the U.S. still has the most military satellites monitoring Earth, both commercial and civilian space initiatives are severely lacking when compared to its international counterparts.

There are several contributing factors into the decline of the U.S. space agency, though immediate fixes are not evident.  Even though NASA has a long string of success, the unfortunate shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003, budget issues, and the looming 2010 retirement of the current generation of space shuttles are all complicating matters.

"We spent many tens of billions of dollars during the Apollo era to purchase a commanding lead in space over all nations on Earth," NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said.  "We've been living off the fruit of that purchase for 40 years and have not ... chosen to invest at a level that would preserve that commanding lead."

Although Russia has been a long-time competitor to NASA, the Chinese space agency and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) have continued to make steady progress with its intended goals.

Along with multiple missions to Mars, China is preparing for stage two of a three-part mission to the moon.  The first step in the plan, which is ongoing, included sending a satellite to orbit the moon.  The second step proposes launching a lunar lander before 2010, and the third step involves collecting soil samples from the moon in the next 12 years.

The Chinese space program also has its first spacewalk scheduled for October. Griffin admits China will likely beat the U.S. and other nations back to the moon.

India also has a developing space program that may not have the type of budget of larger space programs, but the country still has had success launching smaller missions that have shown good results.  Its most recent success was a satellite launch in which 10 satellites launched into orbit aboard one rocket.

The U.S. space agency does have its own mission outline for the next 12 years, but may struggle to meet its goals if the Orion crew vehicle is not completed on time in 2015.

NASA used to be responsible for sending other nations' satellites into orbit, but now Russia, India, and China are the three main nations responsible for helping Israel, Brazil, Singapore and the ESA launch satellites into space.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What do Americans realistically expect?
By mcmilljb on 7/12/2008 8:53:18 PM , Rating: 3
We kick ass because no one else can build the international space station without us sending up some of the modules!

"NASA used to be responsible for sending other nations' satellites into orbit, but now Russia, India, and China are the three main nations responsible for helping Israel, Brazil, Singapore and the ESA launch satellites into space."

Then have them send the damn modules for the international space station! Oh wait, they can't! We have to do it. Every other major nation is working on it. If we would just abort it and quit screwing with long, useless projects, then we might actually be able to go back to the moon and then Mars. The international space station was and still is a waste of money considering we're pretty much footing the bill sending up most of the parts.

Lets bust out our 60's technology and go back! Then we can laugh at China while they still try to get there. But sadly, there isn't much in space that we can use with our current technology. We need to work on other things ot make our space travels and explorations useful.


By maven81 on 7/14/2008 11:19:42 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Then have them send the damn modules for the international space station! Oh wait, they can't!


Where do you get this crap? The Russians have launched several of the modules. In fact it's laughable to suggest that they can't do it considering they've built many space stations over the past several decades, at least 5 I believe.


"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki