Print 107 comment(s) - last by glitchc.. on Aug 11 at 10:58 AM

The U.S. used to only compete with Russia, but now has multiple other nations to deal with

The U.S. is losing ground to competing space agencies as Europe, China, Russia and Japan continue to make progress in their space programs.  Even though the U.S. still has the most military satellites monitoring Earth, both commercial and civilian space initiatives are severely lacking when compared to its international counterparts.

There are several contributing factors into the decline of the U.S. space agency, though immediate fixes are not evident.  Even though NASA has a long string of success, the unfortunate shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003, budget issues, and the looming 2010 retirement of the current generation of space shuttles are all complicating matters.

"We spent many tens of billions of dollars during the Apollo era to purchase a commanding lead in space over all nations on Earth," NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said.  "We've been living off the fruit of that purchase for 40 years and have not ... chosen to invest at a level that would preserve that commanding lead."

Although Russia has been a long-time competitor to NASA, the Chinese space agency and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) have continued to make steady progress with its intended goals.

Along with multiple missions to Mars, China is preparing for stage two of a three-part mission to the moon.  The first step in the plan, which is ongoing, included sending a satellite to orbit the moon.  The second step proposes launching a lunar lander before 2010, and the third step involves collecting soil samples from the moon in the next 12 years.

The Chinese space program also has its first spacewalk scheduled for October. Griffin admits China will likely beat the U.S. and other nations back to the moon.

India also has a developing space program that may not have the type of budget of larger space programs, but the country still has had success launching smaller missions that have shown good results.  Its most recent success was a satellite launch in which 10 satellites launched into orbit aboard one rocket.

The U.S. space agency does have its own mission outline for the next 12 years, but may struggle to meet its goals if the Orion crew vehicle is not completed on time in 2015.

NASA used to be responsible for sending other nations' satellites into orbit, but now Russia, India, and China are the three main nations responsible for helping Israel, Brazil, Singapore and the ESA launch satellites into space.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Huh?
By AnnihilatorX on 7/12/2008 2:52:07 AM , Rating: 1
Read the title once again "Report: U.S. Expected to Lose Lead in Space Race", and examine your justification and definition of lead.

US space funding has been dropping while the funding in space programme of other countries is rising rapidly. Having been to the Moon is not the definite judgement of being a "leader" in space, it's very much determined by amount of funding.

RE: Huh?
By INeedCache on 7/13/2008 2:16:52 AM , Rating: 2
What exactly are we "racing" for now in space?

RE: Huh?
By Pavelyoung on 7/13/2008 4:00:42 AM , Rating: 2
Think about it like this. The worlds population is not going to decline anytime in the near future. In fact its just going to continue to get larger and larger. The race we are in now is that of learning how to create viable settlements on other planets like Mars.

We need to expand and the only logical place left to go is up.

RE: Huh?
By Brian H on 7/19/2008 2:30:36 AM , Rating: 2
Nah, that doesn't work. You can't export overpopulation. Not that overpopulation is actually a threat. Except of certain types of politician, lawyer, and others: I've got a Little List. They'll NONE of them be missed!

But there are wealth and resources to be had in the asteroid belt and elsewhere which will allow Earth to be redeveloped as a garden residence, while most of the industrial goods are manufactured -- to much higher quality and performance and efficiency standards -- in space. Yes, despite the gravity well. There are solutions for that ranging from Space Elevators or Fountains on out.

"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke

Most Popular ArticlesAMD, Zen Processor might power the upcoming Apple MacBook Pro
September 30, 2016, 5:00 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Apple’s Siri Speaker is a Game Changer
September 26, 2016, 5:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki