Print 84 comment(s) - last by dwalton.. on Jul 16 at 4:09 PM

Intel says CUDA will be nothing but a footnote in computer history

Intel and NVIDIA compete in many different ways. The most notable place we see competition between the two companies is in chipset manufacturing. Intel and NVIDIA also compete in the integrated graphics market where Intel’s integrated graphics chips lead the market.

NVIDIA started competing with Intel in the data processing arena with the CUDA programming language. Intel’s Pat Gelsinger, co-general manager of Intel’s Digital Enterprise Group, told Custom PC that NVIDIA’s CUDA programming model would be nothing more than an interesting footnote in the annals of computing history.

According to Gelsinger, programmers simply don’t have enough time to learn how to program for new architectures like CUDA. Gelsinger told Custom PC, “The problem that we’ve seen over and over and over again in the computing industry is that there’s a cool new idea, and it promises a 10x or 20x performance improvements, but you’ve just got to go through this little orifice called a new programming model. Those orifices have always been insurmountable as long as the general purpose computing models evolve into the future.”

The Sony Cell architecture illustrates the point according to Gelsinger. The Cell architecture promised huge performance gains compared to normal architectures, but the architecture still isn’t supported widely by developers.

Intel’s Larrabee graphics chip will be entirely based on Intel Architecture x86 cores says Gelsinger. The reason for this is so that developers can program for the graphics processor without having to learn a new language. Larrabee will have full support for APIs like DX and OpenGL.

NVIDIA’s CUDA architecture is what makes it possible to process complex physics calculations on the GPU, enabling PhysX on the GPU rather than CPU.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: CUDA a joke ???
By Mitch101 on 7/2/2008 6:06:40 PM , Rating: 2
Why is it that no one thinks Intel can make a graphics chip?

Intel never tried to really make a real 3d chip before. Their bread and butter was always corporate desktops which didn't need 3D. They only added enough to make the OS work well. They have just enough in the chip to do Vista but they were never designed to be graphics chips. Somehow I don't believe their current chips were designed with Crysis in mind. That's why there is a PCI-E slots on the mobo.

Somehow I think Intel will figure out how to draw a polygon and do it really fast.

Until you spot a PCI-E graphics card from Intel I would suggest not doing the NVIDIA and running off at the mouth.

Somehow I think the Intel bunny men engineers will have the last laugh when the time is right.

BTW Intel's bottom line seems to be doing incredibly well without a 3D graphics card to save them from bankruptcy and a GPU doesn't run very well without a mobo and cpu but a CPU runs quite well without a GPU. GPU's are dependent on a CPU still until they run withouth a CPU the GPU will need to play catchup.

Did everyone catch the call about NVIDIA lowering their revenue forcast?

RE: CUDA a joke ???
By SavagePotato on 7/3/2008 10:55:15 AM , Rating: 1
Most likely because Intel currently makes very lousy IGP solutions, and did indeed enter the discreet graphics arena once already. Which was a dismal failure.

The intel i740.

We have one of those sitting on a shelf collecting dust somewhere in the box.

"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer
Related Articles
GeForce 8 To Get Software PhysX Engine
February 15, 2008, 10:33 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki