Print 73 comment(s) - last by nstott.. on Jun 24 at 8:46 PM

Critics say compromise bill is anything but

The U.S. House of Representatives quickly passed the FISA Amendments Act yesterday, which if made into law would expand the government's surveillance abilities and grant retroactive immunity to telecoms for their role in post-9/11 mass domestic wiretapping.

The Act, known more formally as H.R. 6304 and born after months of negotiations, represents a “bipartisan compromise” over similar legislation that died on the House floor last February.

Much of the negotiations revolved around the thorny issue of “telecom immunity,” which if included would kill the 40+ lawsuits currently in progress accusing communications providers of assisting the Bush Administration in an illegal, post-9/11 surveillance program. As the bill currently stands, a court review will determine if providers received a presidential order requesting the wiretaps – regardless of whether or not the correct warrants were filed – and then drop all pending litigation if that condition was met.

The “warrantless wiretapping” program, initiated by the Bush Administration in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, ran for almost six years until it was discovered by the New York Times.

With time running out on the country’s surveillance laws – current versions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which governs the nation’s surveillance activities, are set to expire in August – Congress has little time to negotiate. The Bush Administration previously took a hard-line stance against FISA updates that failed to include a provision for telecom immunity, although it was reported earlier this year that the White House decided to relax its stance.

The FISA Amendments Act “balances the needs of our intelligence community with Americans' civil liberties, and provides critical new oversight and accountability requirements,” said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer.

“The House of Representatives today has fallen down on the job,” said the Electronic Frontier Foundation activist Hugh D’Andrade. “By passing the FISA Amendments Act … [the House] voted to give this lame duck President an undeserved parting gift by passing immunity for telecoms that helped the President violate the Constitution by participating in the NSA's massive and illegal spying program.”

“Immunity for telecom giants that secretly assisted in the NSA's warrantless surveillance undermines the rule of law and the privacy of every American,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. “We are deeply disappointed that the House Leadership, which was so courageous in its previous opposition to telecom immunity, caved to the Administration's fear-mongering and put this seriously flawed legislation on the floor for a vote.”

In addition to the aforementioned telecom immunity provisions, the FISA Amendments Bill would:

  • Allow the government to conduct emergency eavesdropping without court approval for up to a week.
  • Allow secret FISA courts to review expiring surveillance orders for up to 30 days before renewing them.
  • Prohibit the government from superseding surveillance rules, even if it invokes war powers.
  • Require court permission to wiretap Americans overseas.
  • Obscure out American citizens’ names when wiretapping conversations between an American citizen and a foreigner.

H.R. 6304 passed the House 239-129, and is slated for the Senate as early as June 23.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By A Mad Pole on 6/23/2008 9:51:48 AM , Rating: 2
"Neo-cons can make a reaonable argument for some of their surveilance stuff, but this retroactive immunity crap is a joke"

Hmm, I thought that it is the Democrats who are in the control of both the House and Senat, not the neo-cons.

RE: Neo-cons????
By JCY on 6/23/2008 11:11:57 AM , Rating: 2
Both are right wing from my perspective, so the choice seems more of the degree of neo-con when looking at Democrats and Republicans. When compared with other multiparty governments in Europe.

RE: Neo-cons????
By nstott on 6/23/2008 9:26:10 PM , Rating: 2
You have no clue what "neocon" means. Why not just call them "Zionists" instead like the people in the Middle East do to anybody they perceive to be an enemy? Actually, "neocon" is the new "Zionist" over there too.

Neocons, or new conservatives, are such because they mix in some of their liberal roots with the conservative principles. The traditional conservatives, occasionally called paleocons or old conservatives, are far more "right-wing." One example is Pat Buchanan:

Most Republicans in Congress and Bush are not neocons. Wikipedia actually has a decent entry on the movement (one of the few cases).

Also, go take a look at The Weekly Standard to read the neocon perspectives directly from the horses' mouths:

The paleocon perspective can be found at The American Conservative:

RE: Neo-cons????
By A Mad Pole on 6/24/2008 11:21:46 AM , Rating: 2
"Both are right wing from my perspective"

So you must be quite a lefty if the US Democrats are "right-wing " to you.

Ever lived in a communist-run country? Try it first before praising the left.

"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki