Print 78 comment(s) - last by lco45.. on Jun 23 at 5:44 AM

An artist's rendition of the new discovery of the three new planets, orbiting a star previously thought to hold none.  (Source: ESO)
More new Earth like planet discoveries pour in

Planets just aren't quite as unique as they once were thought to be.  During the medieval times, it was thought that the Earth was the center of the universe about which the sun and planets rotated. 

With time it was realized that the Earth was just one of the solar planets orbiting the sun, but skepticism that planets existed outside the solar system remained strong.  However, with the advent of new techniques and more power telescopes researchers began to discover extrasolar planets at a rapid pace, starting in the 1988, with the discovery of planets orbiting the star Gamma Cephei.  Meanwhile a large new orbiting body was discovered on the fringes of our own system, while Pluto was downgraded to a mere "Plutoid".

Some of these planets were deemed somewhat Earth-like in that they were smaller than gas giants, might have water, and could be made to be habitable.  Other extrasolar planets were similar in size to Earth, but were way to hot to inhabit with current technologies.

Now European astronomers have continued the run of discoveries of smaller planets with the discovery of a trio of "super-Earths" rotating around the star HD 40307, located 42 light-years from Earth towards the southern Doradus and Pictor constellations.  The new planets have masses of 4.2, 6.7, and 9.4 times the mass of Earth and orbits of 4.3, 9.6, and 20.4 days respectively.

The star they orbit is a normal star, approximately the same size as our sun.  According to Didier Queloz and Michel Mayor, expert planet hunters who led the discovery team, the planets are too hot to support life as we know it.

However, despite this slight disappointment, the discovery raises the intriguing possibility of a so-called "crowded universe" teeming with undiscovered planets.  HD 40307 was long thought to hold no planets -- it is clear now that the discovery was only possible with the advances in detection.  There are likely many smaller planets that have yet to be detected.  In total 270 extrasolar planets have already been found.

Stéphane Udry, a colleague of Mayor, describes the advance stating, "With the advent of much more precise instruments such as the HARPS spectrograph on ESO's 3.6-m telescope at La Silla, we can now discover smaller planets, with masses between 2 and 10 times the Earth's mass."

Mayor who works at the Geneva Observatory states, "Does every single star harbour planets and, if yes, how many?  We may not yet know the answer but we are making huge progress towards it.  Clearly these planets are only the tip of the iceberg.  The analysis of all the stars studied with HARPS shows that about one third of all solar-like stars have either super-Earth or Neptune-like planets with orbital periods shorter than 50 days."

The slowly unfolding picture of a universe full of planets brings two key possibilities.  First, the possibility of expansion and colonization outside the solar system, and secondly, the possibility of extraterrestrial life.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: If space is so massive...
By phattyboombatty on 6/18/2008 6:01:30 PM , Rating: 0
I agree that there isn't evidence against other intelligent life. However, there is no evidence, either direct or circumstantial supporting the existence of intelligent life other than ourselves. There is only conjecture based on the idea that the universe is really big so we must not be alone.
there is evidence that life will tend to evolve whenever certain conditions are present.

There is only evidence that life evolved once. You would need to find a second case other than Earth to support your statement. Your statement is even more outrageous when you take into account that scientists are not even certain what the conditions on Earth were when life evolved. All we know is that on one planet in the universe, life happened to evolve. That's it. Maybe the same process has occurred on millions of occasions throughout the universe, but maybe not. It is impossible to state any probabilities when you only have one example to work with.

RE: If space is so massive...
By Ringold on 6/18/2008 6:13:05 PM , Rating: 2
You would need to find a second case other than Earth to support your statement.


If the universe is infinite (or really, really, amazingly huge), then if Earth exists with intelligent life, obviously the probability is greater than zero.

Beyond that, if Mars had just a little more mass, and therefore managed to keep more of its atmosphere, it would've been conducive to life. There is liquid water under the surface of Europe, so there's a shot there. Thats one winner for life, and two close-calls, in one solar system.

With a probability greater than zero and an infinite universe, logic dictates there must be countless other Earth-like planets.

If you take a look at any of the pictures of distant galaxy clusters from a telescope like Hubble, and realize that almost everything in the image is a galaxy, and that thus you're looking at perhaps trillions of trillions of stars in just a tiny sliver of the sky.. Is it really all that hard to figure out that somewhere out there some other species developed an opposable thumb or equivalent?

Load that picture up, and zoom in. We can't possibly be that special; to even think we could be almost seems arrogant.

RE: If space is so massive...
By phattyboombatty on 6/18/08, Rating: 0
RE: If space is so massive...
By idconstruct on 6/18/2008 7:15:34 PM , Rating: 3
You can't just selectively exclude earth from a probability based on the universe when the earth is very clearly part of it.

With a probability greater than zero and an infinite universe, logic dictates there must be countless other Earth-like planets.

I think there's something about that quote you must not understand.^

Obviously, if the question is "What is the probability of life existing in the universe?", that probability would be 1

yes this is nit-picky but a probability of 1 is like saying: The Universe = Earth
The probability is actually 1*10^-(BIG NUMBER)... yes it is small, but it is greater than zero. As such, if you multiply that by an infinite universe, you have infinite other planets with life.

It's similar to asking what is the probability of pulling a blue marble out of a bag, where you have no idea what color marbles are in the bag.

Well, considering we've pulled quite a few marbles out of the bag already and one of them was indeed blue (earth) how is it unreasonable to assume there could be more in the bag? Especially considering there's upwards of millions or billions of marbles in the bag?

RE: If space is so massive...
By cyclosarin on 6/22/2008 12:46:44 AM , Rating: 2
He isn't discounting the Earth. He's saying Earth is reference point 1, find reference point number 2 before you start extrapolating data.

You're trying to debate on an emotional level based on your belief structure and you aren't comprehending the debate on a logical level. He's already said there could be millions of 'earths' out in the universe, he also said we could be the only one. We have no proof either way at this point.

RE: If space is so massive...
By masher2 on 6/18/2008 9:52:50 PM , Rating: 1
> "We haven't even been able to replicate abiogenesis under presumably ideal conditions in a controlled laboratory setting"

I'm surprised you didn't sprain a finger when you typed the word "even" in that sentence. Once we've "replicated abiogenesis", we've created life itself. It's something that took nature billions of years and a laboratory the size of a planet (if not larger) to accomplish...and you're upset because we haven't been able to replicate that in our extremely limited experiments of the past 50 years or so?

The fact is, while we haven't replicated the entire process, we've made enormous strides in many areas. We've shown that inorganic molecules can spontaneously form into organic nucleotides -- not under "controlled laboratory conditions" but under conditions the primordial earth would have had. We've seen those nucleotides self-assemble into larger units, and likewise seen the spontaneous formation of protocells, which exhibit behavior remarkably similar to the simplest eukarotic life.

At our current rate of progress, within the next 250 years or so, we'll not only have replicated the entire process, but we'll be custom-building our own lifeforms, to whatever designs we wish.

"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Related Articles
We Are All Made of Stars; Maybe
June 16, 2008, 5:16 AM
Pluto Gets Classified
June 13, 2008, 5:41 AM

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki