backtop


Print 52 comment(s) - last by Myrandex.. on Jun 18 at 3:13 PM


Two dust particles from the Murchison meteorite which fell to Earth in Australia in 1969.  (Source: Argonne National Laboratory, Department of Energy)
New evidence suggests that basic life really may have come from the stars.

It has long been thought that the seeds for life came to a primordial Earth from solar system leftovers crashing into the planet. These meteorites, comets, or other unknowns may have contained vital components with which budding life on Earth either assimilated or used as a catalyst to create itself. Now, in a paper to be published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, European scientists claim they have evidence to prove the theory may be correct.

The group, based at Imperial College London, found some of the base building blocks for life, nucleobases, in dust from the Murchison meteorite which fell to Earth in 1969. Nucleobases, in this case uracil and xanthine, are the components that make up two of the most important parts of any Earth-bound life form, DNA and RNA.

In order to confirm that these molecules weren't from simple contamination, the researchers analyzed the individual atoms of the nucleobases. They found the carbon contained within was a heavier breed that what forms naturally on Earth. The molecules must have come from space.

Professor Mark Sephton, a co-author of the paper states “Because meteorites represent left over materials from the formation of the solar system, the key components for life -- including nucleobases -- could be widespread in the cosmos. As more and more of life’s raw materials are discovered in objects from space, the possibility of life springing forth wherever the right chemistry is present becomes more likely.”

While giving insights on how higher life may have formed on Earth, the finding may also bolster the theory that life may have once existed on a warmer, wetter Mars or a cooler, clearer Venus. NASA hopes to find evidence for such theories by analyzing the ice contained in the soil of the red wasteland that the Mars Phoenix Lander touched down on.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The World was made in 7 days.... yeah right
By Dreamwalker on 6/16/2008 5:47:18 AM , Rating: 3
Well, I guess after this discovery and in case of approval, God may have to pack his lugage :D and millions of people will have to find another hobby:P lol

no offence to the HC believers;)




By GaryJohnson on 6/16/2008 8:17:02 AM , Rating: 3
Actually the universe was created last thursday... the FSM just put those nucleobases in that meteorite to test your faith.


RE: The World was made in 7 days.... yeah right
By callmeroy on 6/16/2008 8:56:46 AM , Rating: 2
Well I call myself a christian, be it not a traditional christian (that conjures up visions of someone who never ever dares sway from the perfect straight line in life and has perfect church attendances)...no I'm a christian in the sense I do believe, I do go to church and I "try" my best to follow the teachings of what many christians adhere too, I do question my faith constantly though which I happen to think is healthy, as I believe that's what keeps it strong.

Now the weird part -- not only do I believe but I'm also a geek for this kind of stuff -- the universe how it all came to be , evolution, etc. I think the logic of science and faith ARE compatible to co-exist with one another.

Ulitmately I'm not shocked at people who mock or don't believe in God or any religion indeed it seems as time moves on less and less folks believe. I don't care what your beliefs are - I do feel bad and thing its sad though when someone beliefs in NOTHING, that's the true shame.

To believe in nothing is the worse thing you can belief in.


By callmeroy on 6/16/2008 8:58:43 AM , Rating: 3
...and apparently I don't believe in spell checking....sorry for the abundant typos.


By pxavierperez on 6/17/2008 7:48:34 AM , Rating: 3
Not believing in God does not equate to believing in nothing. it just means not believing in... God.


By Reclaimer77 on 6/16/2008 11:17:59 AM , Rating: 2
I think believing in this theory is as much of a leap of faith as believing in a God.

You have to admit, its pretty half baked. I mean, we can't KNOW can we ? It might be possible, it sounds plausable, but we will never KNOW.

I'm just playing devils advocate. But it seems to me that believing scientist today who never witnessed these events, and who can't test them, can explain the origins of life from meteors is placing the same amount of faith that those who believe in god do.


By geddarkstorm on 6/16/2008 12:52:34 PM , Rating: 2
Why yes, they discovered uracil (only one base out of 5), and xanthine (a precursor base to the purines adenine and guanine) in some meteor. Supposing such chemicals didn't react with anything else on early earth to destroy them once they were released from the meteor (these that were found were still locked in, hence why they still existed), what about the ribose sugar and diester phosphate needed to complete the DNA/RNA backbone? Where'd those come from? Nevermind that if life like reactions started by using these (and how would it convert xanthine to adenine and guanine anyways without already being alive and developed to that point before hand?), it still needed to learn to synthesize these nucleobase molecules which requires very complex multi step, multi protein reactions and tons of energy; very elaborate cofactors such as THF; and proteins to be catabolized as the base for the purine/pyrimidine ring structure.

Nucleobases are meaningless by themselves. Caffeine is a nucleobase derivative of xanthine too, for instance, and you don't see it in our DNA. This whole thing is old news, but utterly meaningless biology wise, as just throwing nucleobases at a pond of goo will do nothing. The only thing it could do is provide carbon and nitrogen in a nice little bundle for energy saving catabolism and base scavenging, but that's it; which could be quite helpful for life that already existed to flourish during its fragile stage.


By masher2 (blog) on 6/16/2008 2:40:24 PM , Rating: 2
> "still needed to learn to synthesize these nucleobase molecules which requires very complex multi step, multi protein reactions and tons of energy"

How do you believe these nucleobases wound up in the micrometeorites unless they were spontaneously synthesized in some manner?


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson

Related Articles
Mars Phoenix Lander Touches Down
May 26, 2008, 12:46 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki