Print 79 comment(s) - last by ceefka.. on Jun 19 at 11:17 AM

Mockup USB 3.0 cable  (Source: Tech On)
Intel says open host controller specifications have cost gazillions of dollars to develop

According to Intel’s Nick Knupffer, there are a lot of myths going around concerning USB 3.0 and Intel’s involvement in the development of the specification. Knupffer wrote a blog post on Intel’s website in an attempt to dispel these myths.

Knupffer points out that Intel is not developing the USB 3.0 specification. What Intel is developing is the host controller spec which Knupffer describes as a “Dummies Guide” to building a USB 3.0 compatible piece of silicon.

Knupffer says in the blog post that Intel has invested “gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours” in developing the open host controller and despite its significant investment still plans to give the specification to competing manufacturers for free. Knupffer also says that Intel loves it when CPU performance is used to the max and the huge increase in bandwidth of USB 3.0 will mean larger file transfers and more processor usage. This in turn is expected to lead to an increased demand for faster processors.

AMD and NVIDIA leveled allegations at Intel recently that claim Intel was withholding the open host controller specifications in an attempt to give itself a market advantage. Intel and AMD claim that by withholding the specification the lead Intel will have in bringing USB 3.0 compliant products to market will be in the six to nine month range.

Intel denied the allegations of withholding the open host controller specifications at the time AMD and NVIDIA made their charges public and announced they would be designing their own open host controller. In Knupffer’s blog post, he again says that Intel isn’t holding the open host controller specifications back from competitors.

According to Knupffer, the significant investment in the open host controller specifications is specifically to get USB 3.0 into the market faster, so why would it withhold the specification. Intel still maintains that the specifications aren’t ready and that it plans to give the specifications to other manufacturers in the second half of 2008.

The final myth that Knupffer addresses in his post is that USB 3.0 technology borrows heavily from technology used in PCI Express. Intel points out that it was involved with both the PCI-SIG and the USB-IF at the design stage for both PCI Express and for USB 3.0. The insinuation form Intel is that the technology that is similar in both devices was developed on its dime.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By FITCamaro on 6/12/2008 3:21:23 PM , Rating: 2
I prefer to live past age 40 without diabetes.

By JonnyDough on 6/13/2008 3:38:54 AM , Rating: 2
You must have been down rated by a late night sugar monger, or else someone who just jabbed their arm to administer insulin didn't think you were funny. Either way, I'm not a big fan of soda pop or deserts. I'll take the second and third helping of that deep dish yummy casserole though.

By plinkplonk on 6/13/2008 5:58:58 AM , Rating: 4
you can enjoy all these refreshments without getting diabetes, just don't go crazy and eat gazillions of them a bazillion times a day and you'll be fine ;)

By JonnyDough on 6/13/2008 6:50:43 AM , Rating: 2
Always in moderation, I know I know. It's just, I don't really crave sweets. Weird? I binge on a bit of chocolate now and then, but I did live an hour from Hershey, PA for about 6 years as a kid.

By Regs on 6/17/2008 8:40:48 AM , Rating: 2
How about live to the age of 39, and then get hit by a truck?

"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki