backtop


Print 79 comment(s) - last by ceefka.. on Jun 19 at 11:17 AM


Mockup USB 3.0 cable  (Source: Tech On)
Intel says open host controller specifications have cost gazillions of dollars to develop

According to Intel’s Nick Knupffer, there are a lot of myths going around concerning USB 3.0 and Intel’s involvement in the development of the specification. Knupffer wrote a blog post on Intel’s website in an attempt to dispel these myths.

Knupffer points out that Intel is not developing the USB 3.0 specification. What Intel is developing is the host controller spec which Knupffer describes as a “Dummies Guide” to building a USB 3.0 compatible piece of silicon.

Knupffer says in the blog post that Intel has invested “gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours” in developing the open host controller and despite its significant investment still plans to give the specification to competing manufacturers for free. Knupffer also says that Intel loves it when CPU performance is used to the max and the huge increase in bandwidth of USB 3.0 will mean larger file transfers and more processor usage. This in turn is expected to lead to an increased demand for faster processors.

AMD and NVIDIA leveled allegations at Intel recently that claim Intel was withholding the open host controller specifications in an attempt to give itself a market advantage. Intel and AMD claim that by withholding the specification the lead Intel will have in bringing USB 3.0 compliant products to market will be in the six to nine month range.

Intel denied the allegations of withholding the open host controller specifications at the time AMD and NVIDIA made their charges public and announced they would be designing their own open host controller. In Knupffer’s blog post, he again says that Intel isn’t holding the open host controller specifications back from competitors.

According to Knupffer, the significant investment in the open host controller specifications is specifically to get USB 3.0 into the market faster, so why would it withhold the specification. Intel still maintains that the specifications aren’t ready and that it plans to give the specifications to other manufacturers in the second half of 2008.

The final myth that Knupffer addresses in his post is that USB 3.0 technology borrows heavily from technology used in PCI Express. Intel points out that it was involved with both the PCI-SIG and the USB-IF at the design stage for both PCI Express and for USB 3.0. The insinuation form Intel is that the technology that is similar in both devices was developed on its dime.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

"Gazillions" and "Bazillions"
By Goty on 6/12/2008 12:58:50 PM , Rating: 2
Hmmm. Must be technical terms. =P




RE: "Gazillions" and "Bazillions"
By Misty Dingos on 6/12/2008 1:10:57 PM , Rating: 3
Yes they are VERY technical and because I am nice person and I like to help folks out I will define them for you.

A gazillion is more than 1 and less than infinity.
A bazillion is more than 10 and less than infinity +1.

Glad I could be of help.
Next question?


RE: "Gazillions" and "Bazillions"
By iceolate on 6/12/2008 2:13:24 PM , Rating: 2
No way! I'm pretty sure a gazillion is more than a bazillion... Like, 10 times more... I think you've got it backwards.


By Chernobyl68 on 6/12/2008 3:50:36 PM , Rating: 4
I've told him a zillion times not to exaggerate.


"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki